Genre: Drama
Directed by: François Truffaut
Starring: Jeanne Moreau, Oskar Werner, Henri Serre, Marie Dubois
When this last screened locally, I wrote: "Along with Godard’s Breathless (1960), François Truffaut’s Jules et Jim (1962) is probably the essential French New Wave film — and it’s possibly even more essential than Breathless, since it had a greater impact on content. Where Godard’s film was essential in defining the style of the New Wave movement, Truffaut’s defined both style and theme in ways that still seem fresh today — and unlike many New Wave films, it never once threatens to become a parody of itself. The staples of French cinema from that era have been so parodied in the intervening years that the originals sometimes verge on unintentional comedy. Somehow — and I suspect it’s because the film is so generously alive — Jules et Jim has escaped that, despite the fact that iconic aspects of the movie have been parodied (Marie Dubois’ famous cigarette-smoking 'steam engine,' for example). In essence, the film is little more than a love triangle concerning two young men — Jules (Oskar Werner) and Jim (Henri Serre)—who are both in love with the same girl, Catherine (Jeanne Morreau). But Truffaut takes all this to places such stories had almost never gone before."
Full review here: http://avl.mx/lw
Classic World Cinema by Courtyard Gallery will present Jules et Jim Friday, Oct. 19 at 8 p.m. at Phil Mechanic Studios, 109 Roberts St., River Arts District, upstairs in the Railroad Library. Info: 273-3332, http://www.ashevillecourtyard.com
Read more articles in:
MoviesSubscribe to XpressMail. Free Sneak Peek. Every Week.
Want to know what's coming out in Xpress this week before the paper even hits the stands?
We've got your free sneak peek, along with deals available in XpressMail, our weekly email newsletter. (It's the best we can do without time travel.)
-
Comments
-
Related Articles
-
Comments
Make a comment
One of the most overrated of the French new wave.
"Had Jules, Jim and Catherine been born a few generations later, they could have sustained 10 minutes of interest on the Jerry Springer show. Or at least five."
By Me
10/17/2012
And who are you quoting?
By Ken Hanke
10/17/2012
Masterpiece.
By Edwin Arnaudin
10/17/2012
I agree, but I still want to know the source of the glib dismissal from "Me."
By Ken Hanke
10/17/2012
Tim Lott of the Guardian.
http://m.guardiannews.com/film/2009/jul/24/worst-best-films-ever-made?cat=film&type=article
By Me
10/17/2012
He does indeed talk a lot of shit.
By Ken Hanke
10/17/2012
Ben Stephens also makes some points.
http://www.culturevulture.net/Movies/JulesetJim.htm
By Me
10/18/2012
So? A couple of Brits snark at the film.
By Ken Hanke
10/18/2012
"Eliptical, full of wit and radiance, this is the best movie ever made about what most of us think of as the Scott Fitzgerald period (though the film begins much earlier); Truffaut doesn't linger - nothing is held too long, nothing is overstated, or even stated. He explores the medium and plays with it. He overlaps scenes; uses fast cutting, in the manner of Breathless, and leaping continuity, in the manner of Zero for Conduct; changes the size and shape of the images, as Griffith did, pauses for Jeanne Moreau to sing a song (Boris Bassiak's "Le Tourbillon")"
---Pauline Kael
If you haven't seen this film--don't miss this screening!
By carlos
10/18/2012
What are your thoughts, Me?
By Edwin Arnaudin
10/18/2012
It's not a bad film by no means and it's masterfully made of course given that its Truffuat. It's the story I have issue with it just seems totally implausible. When it reaches the point that they get married have a family years go by and they still carry on the ridiculous obsession with Catherine it loses me. To me she was not a likable character at all I was almost happy when she dies just to put the two guys out of their missery.
By Me
10/19/2012
I suppose it depends to some degree on your life experience.
By Ken Hanke
10/19/2012