Charlie Chan in Shanghai

Movie Information

In Brief: Charlie Chan in Shanghai marked the fourth Charlie Chan movie not adapted from a novel and the second one to feature Keye Luke as Charlie's No. One Son, Lee Chan. As most of these films were — it's more obvious if you see them in order — it was designed to directly relate to the films that preceded it, though it's not necessary to have seen the others to follow along. For some reason, it's never quite been given its due. It has one of the strongest plots and a pretty good surprise killer, which I'm sure worked better then than it does now owing to the casting. (What actors become known for years later can be tricky.) The chemistry between Keye Luke and Oland has here fully bloomed but has yet to be totally relegated to comedy relief. (There's even a touching scene where Lee thinks Charlie has been shot.) The premise has Charlie being sent to Shanghai to help break up an opium-smuggling ring. (The movies were never too concerned with why a detective from the Honolulu Police Department was sent on such missions.) Everything about it is just first rate, making it one of the best of all Charlie Chan mysteries.
Score:

Genre: Mystery
Director: James Tinling
Starring: Warner Oland, Irene Hervey, Keye Luke, Jon Hall, Russell Hicks, Halliwell Hobbes
Rated: NR

Charlie Chan in Shanghai

 

It’s interesting at this late date to realize that until I was nearly 30 Charlie Chan in Shanghai (1935) was the third oldest Charlie Chan movie still kicking around. Since then Charlie Chan in Paris (1935) was discovered not to be lost and The Black Camel (1931) was cleaned up and put back in circulation. Back then, it was easily the most polished and best moving of the early movies. Now, it just seems like one of the gang of Fox — pre-20th Century merger — releases — slicker than The Black Camel (but not as ambitious), better paced and slicker than Charlie Chan in London (1934), but just about on par with Charlie Chan in Paris.

 

cc4

 

As I wrote in my book Charlie Chan at The Movies, “One of the unsung gems of the Charlie Chan series, Charlie Chan in Shanghai only errs through a fault that could scarcely have been considered a flaw at the time of its making. Unfortunately, due to a very famous role undertaken by the ‘mystery killer’ five years later, it has become difficult to even take the character seriously, much less be surprised when he is revealed in his true colors. On the off-chance that there are still those unfamiliar with this later characterization, we will only here note that one fully expects the actor to assure Charle, ‘I want to show you that I’m honest in worst way,’ before attempting to con him into buying some item of dubious value.” The modern viewer may well feel like noting — a la Groucho Marx at the end of The Big Store (1941) — “I coulda told you in the first reel he was a crook.”

 

ccreelers

 

With that caveat, it’s worth noting that the film is otherwise such a perfect Charlie Chan film that it hardly matters. True, invention has here started to give way to formula — even more so today when we rarely see these movies in the order they were made. But the formula is a good one — and in this instance has the good sense to slightly spoof itself, as when Charlie delivers a lengthy speech in Chinese that is translated by a native speaker as Charlie’s signature “Thank you so much.” In this regard — and many others — Charlie Chan in Shanghai feels like a movie that was very much made for the fans. Its use of mystery staples — like disguises, forged thumbprints, sudden shifts in suspects, even the old false-scare-by-cat — seem designed to appeal to more general mystery fans. These things may not make for great or baffling mystery (what Charlie Chan film does), but they make for a most excellent time at the movies with the beloved detective.

 

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.