Oblivion

Movie Information

The Story: A caretaker on the remnants of a post-apocalyptic Earth learns things may not be as he's been told. The Lowdown: Solidly-produced, incredibly derivative sci-fi that gets by on competence, but not much more.
Score:

Genre: Science Fiction
Director: Joseph Kosinski (TRON: Legacy)
Starring: Tom Cruise, Morgan Freeman, Olga Kurylenko, Andrea Riseborough, Nikolaj Coster-Waldau
Rated: PG-13

Joseph Kosinski’s Oblivion is what I can only bring myself to call massively OK. It’s certainly not fresh or original. Not a single one of its surprises were surprising — 15 minutes in, I bet my wife five bucks what one of them would be. (I must remember to collect.) It’s also not what I’d call “visually stunning.” Oh, it’s polished and slick and shiny, and the special effects are all clean and mostly solid-looking, but at no point did I have even an inner “wow” moment at how dazzling anything looked. As far as Tom Cruise goes — it’s just another competent, never surprising performance. Like the movie he’s in, he’s OK. (It isn’t his fault that people running around with prop futuristic weapons strike me as silly looking.) That I didn’t mind seeing it — apart from finding the opening stretch on the tedious side — isn’t enough in my mind to warrant its reported $120 million price tag (that’s presumably pre-advertising).

The film’s problem lies in its screenplay, which manages to be both literal-minded and muddled at the same time. It tells too much — even though much of what it tells us (via Cruise’s narration) turns out to be from an unreliable source — and shows too little. There’s a clear desire here to be both thought-provoking and action-packed — not an unreasonable notion, but what results is a slab of one, then a slab of the other without ever actually blending the two. But the biggest problem is that the film wants to present us with a series of startling revelations, few, if any, of which are very startling — largely because they’re all from other movies. In fact, very little in the film isn’t from other movies — all the way down to hero Jack Harper’s (Cruise) little bucolic hideaway where he can kick back and listen to Zeppelin and Procol Harum on remarkably well-preserved pre-apocalyptic vinyl. If you can’t think of sci-fi cross-references to this (as recently as this year’s Warm Bodies), you haven’t seen much sci-fi. That brings me to a strange kind of “read no further” warning. Assuming you have seen a lot of sci-fi and want to stand a chance of being surprised by Oblivion, save the rest of this review till after you’ve seen the movie because the invoking of titles will give what game there is away.

Jack Harper is essentially a kind of human (well, Tom Cruise human anyway) WALL-E, patrolling the remnants of post-apocalyptic Earth to keep some lethal-minded drones running in order to protect some water-extraction business. Like WALL-E, he has also developed a personality (just replace the VHS of Hello, Dolly! with the vinyl and some old books) — despite the fact that his memory has been wiped by his masters. Problem is his wiped memory keeps poking through in dreams — all leading to what I can only think of as An Affair Your Masters Don’t Want You to Remember. (Isn’t it remarkable how readily identifiable landmarks — the top of the Empire State Building, the Washington Monument, Miss Liberty’s torch etc. — always survive an apocalypse?) It’s around the memory-awakening point that Oblivion turns into a knock-off of Duncan Jones’ Moon (2009) — but with added explosions and action biz to make it palatable to a broader public as it winds its way to a crowd-pleasing use of its PG-13 allocated f-word.

It’s mostly Cruise’s — and the effects team’s — show, though there are other cast members. Olga Kurylenko is his past-present-future love interest, while Andrea Riseborough (Made in Dagenham) serves as his biologically accommodating official partner, who likes having her memory wiped. Nikolaj Coster-Waldau is on hand because the film needed a hard-headed resistance fighter to distrust Cruise (see also: The Host for this basic character). Melissa Leo (sporting an absurd Scarlett O’Hara accent for no apparent reason) has the restful role (she only appears on monitor screens) of the overseer. And Morgan Freeman shows up to do his standard Morgan Freeman thing. Everyone does efficiently what they’re paid to do — and not a penny’s worth more, which pretty much describes the whole picture. Rated PG-13 for sci-fi action violence, brief strong language, and some sensuality/nudity.

 

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

14 thoughts on “Oblivion

  1. DrSerizawa

    Not bad. Wasn’t boring and I didn’t look at my watch during it. The one thing that intrigued me was how they got Andrea Riseborough’s pupils to stay so dilated. Olga Kurylenko has done a pretty good job of overcoming her accent and isn’t completely hopeless as an actress unlike most models.

    I can say “actress” can’t I? Or is that politically incorrect now?

  2. Ken Hanke

    If the Oscars can still say actress, we can.

    You clearly liked this more than I did.

  3. DrSerizawa

    Eh, I would rather have seen “IronMan3”. But it was sold out all evening. We went there to see “OZ” but they dropped the evening showings even though the website said there would be a 7:20 showing. So “Oblivion” was our last choice. I don’t feel I wasted my money and that’s okay when all is said and done. Of course I like Tom Cruise a bit so I don’t have to overcome what others have to.

    At least we had a good Tex/Mex dinner and Dos Equis too.

  4. DrSerizawa

    Next week.

    And I’m wondering if “R.I.P.D.” is going to be good. And also the “The Lone Ranger” is now in the que. This summer seems to be shaping up better than last.

  5. Ken Hanke

    The one I’m most interested in is The Great Gatsby. Iron Man was a huge disappointment, but because of the star-director combo I am curious to see The Long Ranger.

  6. Jeremy Dylan

    Eh, I would rather have seen “IronMan3”. But it was sold out all evening.

    Having seen both, I can confirm this.

    I was disappointed that Jaime Lannister’s part in this consisted mainly of wordless glowering.

    • Ken Hanke

      It’s not my fault that you insisted on putting “fucks” into your deathless — and anonymous — prose, which set off the “profanity filter” (which is also not my fault).

Leave a Reply to and where do you put the potato ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.