Timecrimes

Movie Information

In Brief: Like so many science fiction films revolving around the idea of time travel, Nacho Vigalondo’s Timecrimes (2007) is a movie that’s more clever than genuinely good.
Score:

Genre: Sci-fi Horror Thriller
Director: Nacho Vigalondo
Starring: Karra Elejalde, Candela Fernández, Bárbara Goenaga, Nacho Vigalondo
Rated: PG-13

Like so many science fiction films revolving around the idea of time travel, Nacho Vigalondo’s Timecrimes (2007) is a movie that’s more clever than genuinely good. Combine the predictable nature of time travel discussions — paradoxes and philosophical musings — with the fact that this is Vigalondo’s first feature, and it has all the earmarks of low budget (occasionally ingenious) filmmaking that’s meant to grab attention. However, its cleverness is the reason it works on any level at all. Working with four cast members (including Vigalondo himself) and a relatively minor $2.6 million budget, Timecrimes has a knack for looking more gussied up than it actually is, mostly because of the film’s ability to surprise.

I don’t want to get too much into the inner workings of the plot, since the vast majority of the film’s enjoyment lies in how it unravels. The setup finds Hector (Karra Elejalde) moving into a new house with his wife (Candela Fernandez). After sitting in his backyard with a pair of binoculars, Hector sees a topless woman and something going on in the woods behind his house. Instead of minding his own business, he decides to snoop. This nosiness leads him to a naked, unconscious girl, a violent man with a bandaged face, and — eventually — a time machine squirreled away in a secret lab.

Timecrimes goes to great lengths to tie the threads together — often switching back and forth between horror flick, science fiction and thriller — with the crux of the film depending on some new twist or turn right around the corner. Any and all of these surprises are designed to put Hector through the ringer, turning his life into a very singular type of hell. This is truly the point of Timecrimes. Hector opens the film acting dopey and boorish. His clothes are sloppy and his posture bad, and his wife makes reference to how he’s too tired to argue with her. Subsequently, his inability to mind his own business lands him in trouble. But by the time the credits roll, Hector has become a humbled, broken man (and for very good reason).

Or at least that’s how the film seems on the surface but, underneath, the picture questions — in the tradition of time travel sci-fi — the idea of inevitability. Not all of it works (the downbeat ending for the sake of cleverness, is a bit unfortunate), but when Timecrimes is at the top of its game, it’s a genuinely neat little movie.

 

SHARE

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

6 thoughts on “Timecrimes

  1. Ken Hanke

    Oddly enough, since Justin picked this, I think I like the film a bit more than he does.

  2. Justin Souther

    I think I like the film a bit more than he does.

    I came to realize that the bulk of my enjoyment in the film came from not knowing its surprises. Knowing them — and having built them up in my head (the last time I watched this was the first) — means it doesn’t quite stack up for me. I still think it can be pretty nifty at times.

  3. Xanadon't

    I still think it can be pretty nifty at times.

    Part of that niftiness comes with the idea that at times the movie seems to be as much a study/discussion on filmmaking itself (not in any grand way, but I felt it around the edges) as one about time-travel or predetermination.

  4. Ken Hanke

    I did (only it was last night now) and I can see where you’re getting that, but I don’t think I’d have thought of it myself.

    Spoiler Country Below

    Actually, on this viewing I was thinking how much fun it might have been had it kept going. Why stop at three? Why not the clown car of time machines?

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.