Asheville City Council meeting roundup: New design standards and more

Asheville City Council meeting roundup: New design standards and more-attachment0

At tonight’s Nov. 23 meeting, Asheville City Council voted to pass the first major changes to come out of the Downtown Master Plan — new design standards that will result in less projects going directly before Council. Here’s a round up of Twitter updates from Xpress Senior Reporter David Forbes:


Council passes consent agenda, including $605,000 from parking funds to purchase lot located off Eagle St. 05:10:00 PM


Mayor Terry Bellamy asking Noise Ordinance Appeals Board to look at use of jake-brakes by truckers. 05:12:00 PM


Next up: City’s quarterly strategic plan and financial reports. 05:15:00 PM


Asst City Mgr Jeff Richardson presenting video focusing on city partnerships. 05:16:00 PM


Includes Riverlink cleaning up Dingle Creek,  AB-Tech for Oakley police center, WNC air quality on fire engine emissions. 05:21:00 PM


Video also highlighting 770 households participating in new recycling bin program. 05:26:00 PM


Financial report: Property tax revenue on target, sales tax above expected, license fees falling below, investments below. 05:31:00 PM


Permit revenue down 32% compared to last year’s, though some of that decline expected. 05:32:00 PM


Investment earnings down due to state of economy, old certificates maturing, new investments only available at lower interest. 05:34:00 PM


On expenditures aside utilities, personnel costs down, fuel costs might be rising, health care costs spiking. 05:35:00 PM


Council member Bill Russell: “Never been so happy to see a green dot” indicating above-expected earnings, on sales tax. 05:38:00 PM


City Mgr Gary Jackson: City’s fund reserves have increased. 05:39:00 PM


Council member Gordon Smith curious about rental prices, says he’s heard they haven’t declined. 05:41:00 PM


Economic Dev. Director Sam Powers: Asheville moving back to lower unemployment (7.9% currently). 05:42:00 PM


Smith: When tweeted unemployment numbers, a lot of people responded back with concerns aboutt underemployment, job market. 05:43:00 PM


Smith: “I think there are some folks those numbers obscure.” 05:44:00 PM


Bellamy: “Alarmed” about healthcare costs; why are they going up? 05:45:00 PM


Bellamy: “Costs have just exploded” Richardson: Have had a few “catastrophic claims” recently, think it will balance out. 05:46:00 PM


Gary Jackson introducing interim financial director Kai Nelson, who says search for a new director “is very difficult.” 05:50:00 PM


Nelson: Some departments have over 1000 deposits a month, current framework having trouble coding all that info, trying to cope. 05:52:00 PM


Council taking up zoning of recently annexed properties on Airport Rd. to commercial, hwy biz. Passes unanimously. 05:55:00 PM


Council now taking up new development rules from downtown master plan. 05:59:00 PM


In addition to new design guidelines, projects in downtown will have to be 175,000 sq ft to go directly to Council. 06:00:00 PM


Currently the threshhold is 100,000 sq ft. Proposed changes intended to make process streamlined, more transparent. 06:03:00 PM


Neighborhood activists, like PARC group, oppose new thresholds, assert damaging to democracy. 06:05:00 PM


New guidelines would also govern height, setbacks, call for lower heights of buildings on outskirts of downtown. 06:06:00 PM


New setback rules intended to make sure sunlight reaches sidewalk level. 06:12:00 PM


Also, no single side of bldg can be bigger than 145 ft, intended to avoid “huge, wide towers in downtown.” 06:14:00 PM


145 ft. limit is based on the side of the Flat Iron building. 06:15:00 PM


Public hearing on master plan revisions about to begin, Vice Mayor Brownie Newman asking about typo in report. 06:19:00 PM


Former Downtown Commission head Pat Whalen: I felt old rules didn’t work for new era, 100s of citizens spent 1000s of hours on plan. 06:20:00 PM


Whalen: “I don’t agree on all parts of the plan, but it’s not mine, it’s ours,” asks Council to respect work, input. 06:20:00 PM


Activist Steve Rasmussen praises plan on walkability rules, but wants more protection for views, historic bldgs. 06:22:00 PM


Rasmussen worked with Historic Design commission, says “didn’t touch threshold issue.” Personally believes current thresholds should be kept. 06:23:00 PM


Rasmussen: Thresholds act as “brake on the train” to slow projects that might be damaging. 06:24:00 PM


Downtown resident Rylan Hanson: Developers can’t be relied upon to have city’s interests at heart, Council shouldn’t change threshold. 06:26:00 PM


Hanson: “Need to be careful we don’t kill the goose that laid the golden egg” with new rules. 06:27:00 PM


Downtown Association Director Joe Minicozzi: Rules reflect long process, lots of community input, should be supported. 06:28:00 PM


Minicozzi: “This is a more transparent, more predictable process, it’s good for everyone, developers and citizens.” 06:29:00 PM


Downtown resident Susan Griffin: Support changes, “a reasonable way to look at future growth. The city will change, everything changes.” 06:31:00 PM


John Holt: Understands concerns about new rules, puts a lot of trust/power with staff and boards, but “we need to move ahead.” 06:33:00 PM


Asheville resident Karen VanAllen wonders about fate of historic buildings under plan. 06:34:00 PM


Staff: Several downtown buildings designated as historic landmarks, are protected. 06:35:00 PM


Newman makes motion to approve wording part of new rules, says he supports both that and threshold changes. 06:36:00 PM


Newman: “Trying to create a set of policies to encourage investment and growth in downtown” instead of sprawl. 06:38:00 PM


Newman: plan preserves more of a role for Council in downtown development than many anticipated. 06:39:00 PM


Newman: “Big buildings in downtown have always been controversial.” Notes City Hall, Jackson bldg once disliked by many. 06:41:00 PM


Smith: Strict design rules achieved by consensus of master plan committee. “That was miraculous!” 06:42:00 PM


Russell has concerns about infringement on property rights, but respects effort, likes new approval process, will support. 06:44:00 PM


Council member Esther Manheimer: Way master plan came together “was so Asheville.” 06:45:00 PM


Manheimer: With new rules city “will say how high your building can be, exactly what it has to look like” a good effort. 06:46:00 PM
Council member Jan Davis likes plan overall, has concerns about rules governing outskirts of downtown. 06:47:00 PM


Davis: Outskirts a concern because that’s where most of downtown’s expansion will take place. 06:49:00 PM


Bellamy: Process was comprehensive, tonight is just the first phase. A lot of community input given upfront. 06:52:00 PM


Bellamy doesn’t believe opponents have given rules “a fair shake” believes rules represent best of city. 06:53:00 PM


Council passes new design rules unanimously. 06:54:00 PM


Bellamy: Even now “we can’t reject a building just because we think it’s ugly.” 06:54:00 PM


Bothwell opposes new thresholds. “Haven’t heard a reason that makes sense… seems fairly arbitrary to me.” 06:56:00 PM


Bothwell: 100,000 limit already high, “reminds me of environmentalists who constantly compromise up… It’s always giving in” 06:57:00 PM


Bothwell: “w]We’re the voice of the people.” Staff, boards can get too attached to projects to assess them objectively. 06:58:00 PM


Bothwell tries to make friendly amendment to minimally increase threshold, Newman doesn’t accept it. 06:59:00 PM


Newman: Stricter rules don’t work without higher threshold, will result in sprawl. 07:00:00 PM


Newman: “People say they don’t want Asheville to become Charlotte” but that’s what stricter rules and “unpredictable process” create. 07:01:00 PM


Bothwell: “What’s the rationale behind 175,000?” Newman: “No magic behind that #” but did come out of community process. 07:02:00 PM


Bothwell: “Respect [input] tremendously” but doesn’t think threshold had that level of discussion, received 150 emails against. 07:04:00 PM


Newman: “I just disagree.” Smith: “I got those e-mails too” thinks compromise is possible. 07:05:00 PM


Smith broaches raising threshold to 137,000, Bothwell makes motion to do so. 07:07:00 PM


Bothwell’s amendment fails 2-5, with only he and Smith supporting it. 07:08:00 PM


Correction: 137,500 feet. 07:08:00 PM


Bothwell makes amendment to apply conditional zoning process to all projects above 175,000, fails 3-4 he, Davis and Smith supporting. 07:13:00 PM


Bellamy: critics are misinformed, as rules only apply to downtown, not to other neighborhoods. 07:14:00 PM


Bellamy: new rules give assurance that if developer follows rules, guidelines, meets goals, will get approved. 07:14:00 PM


Bellamy: We’ve gone over this for awhile, know details, most of public only heard about this last week. 07:16:00 PM


Council on break. 07:17:00 PM


New threshold rules pass 6-1. Bothwell against. 07:17:00 PM


Council now considering an ethics code. 07:22:00 PM


City Atty Bob Oast: Council has “good ethical compass… You make my job easy” changes consolidate existing rules, laws. 07:24:00 PM


New state law includes mandatory training sessions, city ethical code supplements. 07:26:00 PM


Code spells out sanctions for gifts, favors, use of confidential information, emphasizes need to respect others, process. 07:29:00 PM


New ethics code adds provision for censure by Council. 07:30:00 PM


Bothwell asks for clarification on “grey” provision that Council members behave well. 07:32:00 PM


Bothwell: “I mean, I wore Birkenstocks to Council meetings over the summer. Some might consider that harmful to city’s image.” 07:33:00 PM


Bothwell reminding citizens to keep their sidewalk clean. 07:34:00 PM


Bellamy implores people to send Council “e-mails about what they’re thankful for, we’ve had a lot of not-so-good e-mails lately.” 07:37:00 PM


Meeting adjourned. 07:38:00 PM

SHARE
About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Asheville City Council meeting roundup: New design standards and more

  1. J

    Council passed the new “tough-knuckled” ethics motion. One of the new provisions is: “Not reaching conclusions on issues until all interested parties have had an opportunity to express their position.”

    Uh-oh. Looks like we might have to start censuring Gordo weekly.

  2. Jake Quinn

    Props to Rasmussen and Bothwell, the two brightest lights at last night’s meeting.

    Terry, Esther and Bob: your ethics policy is pathetic, but then you knew that.

  3. BigAl

    So, in summary:

    Mayor defends right of buildings to be ugly. (buildings cannot decide between being grateful or offended)

    Floorspace threshholds threaten Democracy (gasp!)

    Birkenstock-wearing councilman (snicker) morphs into jack-booted sidewalk-sanitation-nazi (Ve haff vays to mek you sweep!)

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.