Local judicial candidates at odds over fall election ballot

Local judicial candidates at odds over fall election ballot-attachment0

A question regarding the voting method for electing two Buncombe County Superior Court judges in November has been raised by one of the five candidates hoping to take a seat on the District 28 bench. The issue has become an agenda item at the State Board of Elections’ public meeting next Tuesday, Aug. 24, here in Asheville.

Kate Dreher, assistant district attorney for Buncombe County and one of two candidates chosen in last May’s primary for the judgeship open at that time, has petitioned the SBOE to overturn its decision regarding the format of the election ballot in the wake of a second opening on the court.

The question revolves around the retirement in June of Judge Dennis Winner. “When Judge Winner announced his [planned] retirement a week before the primary, I stayed focused on the primary — not election law,” Dreher said. But after the primary, “I realized when I saw [the law] that we should resolve conflict before we have an election that’s challenged.”

According to SBOE General Counsel Don Wright, the board determined that the three candidates who filed for the vacancy left by Winner’s retirement would compete against each other in a separate ballot listing. Dreher and Judge Alan Thornburg, the second primary winner in May (who currently holds that seat by appointment), would still run against each other as originally planned. In an Aug. 10 letter to Wright from Dreher’s legal representative, Adam Mitchell of Raleigh, Dreher takes the position that all five candidates should be included under only one ballot listing “without designation as to vacancy.” The state’s instant-runoff voting system would then be implemented to determine two winners from the list of five.

The three candidates who filed for the Winner opening are Heather Whitaker Goldstein, attorney and currently the executive director of the Jewish Community Center in Asheville; Diane K. McDonald, a private-practice attorney in Asheville; and Judge Marvin Pope, currently a District Court judge who lost in the original primary for Superior Court.

“When I contacted the state board,” Dreher said, “it was obvious they were giving this a lot of thought.” But her motivation, she added, was to settle any questions now, in order to avoid any post-election disruption for the court.

According to Wright, the SBOE will hear arguments on the ballot issue in its public session on Tuesday, Aug. 24, and plans to decide the question then. Candidates Goldstein and McDonald have communicated to Wright via e-mail their agreement with the SBOE’s plan to separate the two seats on the ballot. As a sitting judge, Thornburg has declined to comment, Wright said, and he has had no communication from Pope regarding the issue.

Meanwhile, Rachel Rathbone of the Buncombe County Election Services told the Xpress that a draft ballot listing the judgeships in question separately has already been proofed and returned for printing. (Early voting begins Oct. 14.)

The SBOE meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 24, is open to the public. It begins at 9 a.m. in the ballroom of the Renaissance Hotel in downtown Asheville.

SHARE
About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster

3 thoughts on “Local judicial candidates at odds over fall election ballot

  1. RONNIE

    AND YOU WONDER WHY PEOPLE DON’T GO VOTE? THEY (THE VOTERS) NARROWED IT TO TWO AND NOW THEIR IS FIVE. SOUNDS LIKE GOOD OLE BOYS POLITICS AT ITS FINEST!! MAKES ME WONDER WHATS BEHIND ALL THIS? I AM OPEN FOR REASONS.

  2. Buncy

    Dreher, who has no experience except as a screaming fiery prosecutor, is hoping to tap into the votes for the Winner seat on the Superior Court bench, since she has a slim chance against incumbent Alan Thornburg.

    The election laws do not support her fanciful idea.

    These issues should warn us:

    Elections and judges do not mix. Why did the Founders choose the appointment of federal judges and appellate justices and require vetting, hearings, and confirmation by the Senate? — To discourage corruption and encourage the independence of the judiciary, of course.

    We need at least a merit selection system for the appointment of judges in North Carolina. In every state where judges are elected after political campaigns and rich lawyers and their fatcat corporations slipping money under the table to judicial candidates, corruption emerges like the pit vipers slithering from Pandora’s Box.

    NC doesn’t stink like Florida…… not yet anyway.

  3. painted bunting

    You can look at the statutes that govern superior court elections by googling N.C. Gen. Stat. section 327.1 and N.C. Gen. Stat. 329. Those statutes will make a few references to other statutes, which you can then also look up. That will help you understand the situation and feel more informed.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.