Pack Square Conservancy scratches pavilion for park

In a presentation Monday morning, members of the Pack Square Conservancy said they have redesigned the site once reserved for a $2.5 million pavilion. Citing budget and time concerns, conservancy board Chairman Guy Clerici said the Rueter Terrace on the north side of the park has been redesigned to omit the 4,200 square foot pavilion. The conservancy board instead opted for a grassy area and information kiosk.

The conservancy did not yet have the $2 million in hand it wanted before starting construction on the pavilion, Clerici told a group that included several Buncombe County commissioners and Mayor Terry Bellamy. And with the conservancy shooting for a spring opening for the park, time is running out.

“We want to do it before everything dries up and the birds come out,” Clerici said. “We want to have everything buttoned up by spring.”

The new design features trees surrounding a grassy area with an information kiosk on one side. The space, Clerici said, would be big enough for a special event tent and could serve as a place-holder if the city decides to build a pavilion in the future.

Clerici told Xpress that donors who pledged money for the park had been contacted about the change and had registered their approval, and that the Buncombe County Tourism Development Authority will vote Wednesday on whether to continue its $500,000 matching grant in light of the change.

The construction of the pavilion has been a question mark since the beginning of Pack Square Park. Construction was originally anticipated to begin in 2008, but in December of that year its future looked bleak as conservancy members noted delays and funding problems. Last January, the conservancy voted to keep the pavilion in the park’s plans, but delayed construction to allow for more time for fundraising.

Brian Postelle, staff writer

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

5 thoughts on “Pack Square Conservancy scratches pavilion for park

  1. James Fisher

    Seems prudent. And downtown is very short on open grassy spaces. Looking forward to the entire space getting open this Spring!

  2. hauntedheadnc

    There was never a real need for a pavilion, and I found it kind of insulting how they kept bragging about how the information desk in the pavilion was going to be one of the big artworks of the park. Frankly, there are more than enough places already for tourists to go and get their behinds kissed with tongue, just the way they like it. We didn’t need another one, especially when it cost this much. Even though there are already more trees in the new park than there were in the old, you can’t have too many trees in a park, and in this case grass and trees are a better use for the land.

  3. Paul -V-

    More grassy area? Great! I see no downside. We didn’t need the pavilion anyways.

  4. dubbs

    It definitely seems prudent to scrap the pavilion for now. But I was looking forward to having a permanent stage structure for concerts and performances. I think it would be a real asset for the city and would really set us apart. I wasn’t that happy about the bathrooms and the tourist kiosk, though, so maybe it’s for the best.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.