Toiling in the vineyards: Legislators juggle a prolonged season

It’s September — normally a safe time for state legislators who have businesses or jobs to attend to in their home territories. But although the actual number of legislative days in Raleigh is down from past years, the N.C. General Assembly just met for the third time this year, and a fourth round looms.

The 2011-2012 biennium convened on January 26 and ran for 87 work days before its temporary adjournment in June. Notably, the so-called long session when bills are introduced saw just over 1,700 bills brought forward — almost 1,000 bills less than in 2009, and nearly 2,000 less than in 2007. Credit for that reduction seems to go to a new provision in the House Rules limiting House members to no more than 10 public bills each.

Having passed a belt-tightening state budget — overriding the governor’s budget veto — the Legislature adjourned June 28 with plans to reconvene in July to approve new maps for Congressional and state legislative districts. The second session ran from July 13 until July 28, and in addition to redistricting, it included gubernatorial-veto overrides on several key pieces of legislation: Women’s Right to Know (HB 854), Medical Liability Reforms (SB 33), Regulatory Reform Act (SB 781), Employment Security Commission/Jobs Reform (SB 532), Medicaid and Health Choice Providers Requirements (SB 496).

Last week, the Legislature reconvened for a three-day session that had been announced as an opportunity to address constitutional-amendment bills. But the only such bill that saw action was Defense of Marriage (SB 514). The controversial bill defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman, and has thus also become known as the anti-gay-marriage bill.

Contrary to original plans, the public will now be voting on the marriage amendment in the primary election next May — not in the higher-participation general election in the fall. The bill’s passage was accompanied by public demonstrations by supporters and opponents, and by extensive press attention. Meanwhile, the quieter action during the September 12-14 session included an appointments modification bill (SB 354); a prison maintenance bill (HB 335); and an omnibus courts act (SB 580), but no other constitutional amendment bills were considered.

Now a fourth short session for this year is planned for early November, ostensibly to address any necessary action on the state’s redistricting plans, which was required to be reviewed at the federal level. November’s agenda is likely to also include relief legislation in the wake of Hurricane Irene and an expanded agreement with the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians regarding their casino operations. Still on the sidelines but in position to be called onto the field will be the additional veto overrides, as well as additional constitutional amendments that would set term limits for the leaders of the House and Senate (HB 61), and that would put in place an eminent domain provision regarding use of the land (HB 8). Veto overrides are also not entirely off the table, and two targets could be the photo ID requirement for voters (HB 351) and an energy exploration bill that includes the controversial hydraulic fracturing (SB 709).

The historic nature of this Legislature is well known — the first Republic majorities in both House and Senate in some 140 years. History was also made when Gov. Bev Perdue issued a total of 15 vetoes, including the budget bill presented to her (the first budget ever vetoed). Before it’s over, there may also be a record set for the number of times the Legislature meets during its biennium.

by Nelda Holder, contributing editor

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Toiling in the vineyards: Legislators juggle a prolonged season

  1. Phillip Marlowe

    There are 3 branches of government, however, when the Legislature officially adjourns without a date certain for return, then only the Governor can approve their return. Sounds like too much power for the Executive Branch. Perhaps a session here and a session there makes sense.

    • Nelda Holder

      Good point. Date certain for November is actually the 7th. There is a list of what may be considered, primarily budget bills, constitutional amendments, crossover bills, appointment bills ……

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.