The sidewalk shuffle

Sidewalks are a hot issue in Asheville these days, complete with protests, possible changes in city policy and a special Council meeting in Haw Creek at the end of the month focusing on the issue. What’s behind the ruckus?

On May 22, over 200 people marched along Tunnel Road’s infamous “goat path” as part of a “Sidewalks for Safety” march. Asheville City Council has scheduled a rare out-of-City-Hall meeting in Haw Creek Aug. 31 to talk about the issue (years ago, Council held an informal neighborhood meeting about every quarter — when there was a fifth week in the month). Neighborhood leader Chris Pelly has called for “BIG TURNOUT” in a recent e-mail to supporters. At Council’s last meeting, Mayor Terry Bellamy broached the idea of adding sidewalks to newly annexed neighborhoods as part of the city’s standard service package. While Council members, especially Jan Davis, balked at doing that for the two annexations currently under consideration, there was broad support for the general idea.

Shortly after Bellamy’s suggestion, Transportation Director Ken Putnam laid out the city’s situation: There are 165 miles of sidewalk in Asheville, but the city needs an estimated 108 more, especially in areas linking its existing sidewalks.

So if Council’s behind it, and activists in the community want it, why do sidewalks still remain such an issue in Asheville?

Well, for one, they’re expensive. Putnam reported that it cost over $1.5 million to lay 7.5 miles of sidewalks in recent years. Add in issues of state and local jurisdictions along with right-of-ways and actually building the oft-demanded paths becomes a much trickier issue. The city’s budget crunch, along with the political unpopularity of raising taxes, complicates things still further.

Infrastructure in general is one of those famous “bell the cat” issues: Everyone wants it, especially near them, but no one’s enthusiastic about paying for it. Sidewalks are no exception.

Davis, in Council’s discussions, notably pointed out that there are areas annexed into the city decades ago that still lack sidewalks.

At the heart of this is something alluded to by a number of Council members and activists: In previous eras sidewalks weren’t viewed as necessary. Cheap gasoline and cars were assumed to be the norm, then and into the future, leaving little need for sidewalks in many neighborhoods. The result is that, decades later, in different times, Ashevilleans are scrambling to deal with that particular oversight.

When today’s would-be visionaries plan tomorrow’s city, perhaps they should aim to make it as versatile as possible — so the next generation doesn’t have to relive this whole battle.

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “The sidewalk shuffle

  1. Been watching the (progress?) on the area of Haywood /River Arts district. Recent sidewalk work revealed 2 men spreading wet concrete, 6 or 7 guys standing around jawing while the two guys worked. Maybe sidewalks would cost less, if all men were actually being productive.

    I still don’t understand why they are reducing much of the area, from four lanes to two lanes?????

  2. Henry Kennesaw

    D.Dial: “Been watching the (progress?) on the area of Haywood /River Arts district. Recent sidewalk work revealed 2 men spreading wet concrete, 6 or 7 guys standing around jawing while the two guys worked. Maybe sidewalks would cost less, if all men were actually being productive. I still don’t understand why they are reducing much of the area, from four lanes to two lanes?????”

    D.Dial, this is your city tax money at work here. These 9 guys are from the government and they’re here to help. You know the rule for city works employees: ratio is 1 working while 3 lean on their shovels in moral support.

    Hey let’s raise taxes even higher in a recession-turning-depression so we can build even more sidewalks that most citizens won’t use because they drive! But the neo-left on City Council will at least feel good about themselves.

  3. Stacie T.

    “Hey let’s raise taxes even higher in a recession-turning-depression so we can build even more sidewalks that most citizens won’t use because they drive!”

    There are definitely people that would prefer not to drive but feel like they have no other choice, precisely because there is a serious lack of sidewalks (and bike lanes for that matter). Not to mention that living within walking distance of where you work isn’t at all plausible for many people.

Leave a Reply to Stacie T. ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.