Electric vehicles are rolling in right direction

Thanks for your reply to my EV letter, Melissa [Oglesbee] [“Are Electric Vehicles the Answer?” Feb. 12, Xpress]. My complaint was about the tax on innovation by the state, seemingly trying to inhibit an industry in its infancy. True, electricity powers the car, but the public EV stations on Charlotte Street and UNC Asheville both have grid-tied photovoltaic systems!

An electric vehicle has the potential to be powered purely by solar or wind or some sort of renewable energy. Let’s look at some numbers.  An average EV gets the equivalent of 3.7 miles per kwh (kilowatt hour) of electricity. One gallon of unleaded gasoline has the equivalent energy of about 33.7 kwh of electricity. A little conversion yields the equivalent miles per gallon for an EV of about 124 mpg! The average gasoline car consumes from 25 to 35 mpg. At 20 pounds of CO2 per gallon of gasoline consumed, an EV, even in the worst-case nasty coal-burning scenario, will emit four to five times less CO2 than its gas counter part! That’s hardly more damaging to the environment. Plus, the price tag on many EVs is markedly less than the equivalent gas-powered vehicle. (No, Nissan did not hire me.)

I agree: Walk more, use public transportation, don’t eat meat, etc. But mass transit options and real bicycle lanes in these rural areas are decades away. And, it seems, people would prefer to die than give up their carnivorous diets! Sadly, the automobile is here to stay, but not necessarily the internal combustion engine! No, EVs are not the answer to reducing pollution, but they do offer the potential to reduce emissions to almost zero, while saving you at the pump and transporting you from point A to point B as needed. Seems like a win-win situation to me!

— Rudy Beharrysingh
Asheville

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Electric vehicles are rolling in right direction

  1. travelah

    The manufacture of the batteries and the generated power are not even remotely emissions free. However, as long as the wheels are turning, all is good. It’s when the juice runs low that things get dicey.

  2. boatrocker

    Has anyone else ever seen the 1992 TV movie
    “The Water Engine”? It paints a disturbing picture of violent suppression of alternative energy sources. Obviously EV drivers aren’t being herded into death camps, but it does make one think about the resistance that alternative energy sources will face in the upcoming years.

    I find it funny that poo-pooers of EV cars and the like will point out that it does take energy to create them (true), but they often seem to ignore the element of technologies that don’t reduce our atmosphere to a Bejing like existence. It’s not all about economics folks- you can’t breathe money.

    One comment from the original letter made me cringe, however. Yes, eating meat in one’s diet is a caloric nightmare in terms of the environment, but for the record:

    Carnivore=eats meat only
    Herbivore=eats vegetative matter only
    Omnivore=eats both omni=Latin for ‘all’
    ?ovore= eats deep fried anything at the state fair

    Therefore, if I cook a burger on the grill and consume it on a bun with lettuce, tomato, and maybe eat a side of slaw, salad or pasta, that would make me an omnivore, not a carnivore.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.