Edgy Mama: toxic sunscreens in the USA

Once again I’m at the beach with my kids and extended family, typing the names of all our sunscreens into Environmental Working Group’s Sunscreen Guide. I neglected to take my own advice from last summer and bought a bunch of bottles, tubes and sticks of protective lotions, potions and gels — without checking the ingredients (see “Grandma was right — Bonnets and Shirts are the Best Sun Protection,” June 23, 2010 Xpress).

And most of the sunscreens in my 2011 beach bag still contain oxybenzone. This chemical is highly absorbable through the skin and has been linked to developmental and reproductive toxicity, allergies, immune system problems and endocrine disruption. The Centers for Disease Control says oxybenzone resides in the bodies of 97 percent of Americans.

Alright then. Why are oxybenzone and other toxic chemicals allowed in the stuff that we slather on our bodies and those of our children in an attempt to prevent skin cancer? Well, in 1978, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced that it would start evaluating and regulating sunscreens. But there’s been no follow-through. The most recent version of the agency’s proposed rules came out in 2007, but those regulations have not been finalized, though some of them are due to go into effect next year. In the meantime, sunscreen makers are not required to test their sunscreens to make sure they even work as claimed. Nor are the ingredients regulated. According to EWG, six out of 10 high-SPF American sunscreens don’t even offer enough UVA protection to be sold in Europe. So caveat emptor, y’all.

My kids and I spend lots of time outside, especially in the summer. I’ve had malignant melanoma, which has been directly linked to UVA exposure. So what to do? Clearly, I can’t wait another 33 years for the FDA to take action (or not).

I’ve tossed out the potentially “bad” sunscreens, and I’ve ordered a bunch of the potentially “better” sunscreens, most of which contain minerals such as titanium, zinc oxide and avobenzone. These minerals offer protection against UVA and UVB radiation, but are not as likely to penetrate the skin and soak into your bloodstream. Many of the less toxic sunscreens are produced in Europe and Australia, where standards are stricter, thus these “better” sunscreens can be difficult to find around here. The Internet and two-day delivery are your friends.

Beware: Mineral sunscreens may also contain oxybenzone or other potentially toxic nanoparticles. So you need to read the ingredient list on each individual bottle or check the EWG website for their top-rated sunscreens at www.ewg.org (it’s the high-fructose corn syrup story all over again). EWG re-evaluates sunscreens on a yearly basis, so the 2011 list is up-to-the-minute.

Just like my grandma, EWG recommends wearing hats and T-shirts when you can’t avoid sun exposure (and making your kids do so as well). Like mad dogs and Englishmen, we all should strive to stay out of the midday sun. Of course, some sun exposure is good and healthy because it’s difficult to get enough vitamin D otherwise (this vitamin is vitally important to overall health and even prevents certain cancers — and a huge number of Americans are low on vitamin D.

Thus, the safest way to balance sun exposure may be to spend only short amounts of time out in it, and cover up or seek shade if you need to be outside for long periods of time (or if, like us, you and your kids love spending as much time as possible playing in the sea). I’m pretty sure none of us could possibly have a vitamin D deficiency at the moment, but future skin cancer is more of a dicey proposition. So don’t avoid sunscreen but use the mineral-based ones and reapply well and often. At the moment, I’m sporting a band of red skin just below my belly button where I clearly missed swiping today. And my daughter has the classic white hand print on her left thigh where she slapped on sunscreen without spreading it around in her hurry to get to the beach. Oh well. We’ll just keep doing the best we can to balance fun in the sun with reasonable protection.

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Edgy Mama: toxic sunscreens in the USA

Leave a Reply to bill smith ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.