Review of Short Order Durang

There’s something to be said for knowing one’s place in the world, and a show presented at “The Usual Joli Grey Admiral’s Vault, Social Aid, Yacht Club, and Speakeasy off Broadway” is one that is definitely not afraid to embrace the local. And local audiences are the ones most likely to appreciate the insider humor sprinkled throughout Short Order Durang, the current offering at 35below. The show takes a handful of one-acts and screenplays by contemporary playwright Christopher Durang, and serves them up under the conceit of a late-night bar menu at the fictional Usual Joli etc. As is the case with such menus, some dishes really zing, while others leave you feeling at once over-stuffed and under-nourished. But since it’s really all about the beer anyway, maybe that’s okay.

Nevertheless, if what you’re hungry for is adult black comedy, and you don’t mind a certain amount of improvised banter (read: “audience participation”) between courses, you’ll likely enjoy Short Order Durang. Okay, I’m going to drop the culinary metaphor now; but I have to admire director Jason Williams and his collaborators at Asheville Community Theatre for their ability to keep it going all the way down to the last detail. Even the program is chock full of wit, describing one play, for example, as “A dense beefcake of sweaters and rope,” and another as “Fresh Irish Keening sautéed with inappropriateness.” The actors are of course the “servers” here, and one can hardly accuse them of not doing their best to take care of us.

All of this is clever and amusing, and one has the impression that Williams and his actors had a swell time creating this show. One of the stronger plays in the program is “For Whom the Southern Belle Tolls,” Durang’s one-act spoof on The Glass Menagerie. As “Amanda Wingvalley,” Tabatha Hall makes a hilarious pairing with the wry and elfin Ryan Madden, who plays her hypochondriac son. The glee with which the play sends up its original is perhaps best shown by its transformation of the eponymous menagerie into a mug full of swizzle sticks. Hall and Adam Arthur, who also serves in the general capacity of “head waiter” for the show, make a strong showing together in “Funeral Parlor”; and Madden and Stephanie Hickling have a humorous turn in “DMV Tyrant.” The entire cast is involved in the preposterous “Medea” and “The Actor’s Nightmare,” and these occasion some genuine guffaws as well.

For me the great discovery of the evening was Tabatha Hall, who not only seemed to grasp the essence of each character she played, but wisely refrained from hamming it up. There’s also a wonderfully expressive openness to her face — an effect at least partly due to the fact that she keeps her head up and her gaze outward. Some of the other actors, alas, tended to stare either at the wall behind the audience’s heads, or else down at the floor in front of their own feet. This kind of thing is odd indeed in a space as intimate as 35below, where every flicker of an actor’s eyelid is plainly visible. That said, allowances should perhaps be made: the recent spell of bad weather has meant a lot of disruptions to this production, and without a doubt this has an adverse effect on the actors’ ability to face an audience confidently.   

But if the show turns out to be uneven, the fault lies at least as much with the material itself as with its interpreters at ACT. Durang has about the most pedigree of any living playwright in America, having been educated at Harvard and the Yale School of Drama, and now heading up the playwriting program at Julliard. Though his heyday was in the 1980s, his plays, screenplays and (yes) musicals continue to be produced and celebrated for their absurd humor and general irreverence. But the truth is, much of it just isn’t all that funny, and some is simply in poor taste. “The Book of Leviticus Show,” for instance, attempts to lampoon ignorant Southern Christian fundamentalists, but the caricature is so exaggerated that it comes off more like a rant. Maybe it would be funnier to someone who has never met an actual Southern Christian fundamentalist. Well, we all have our hang ups. One of Durang’s is apparently religion.

Be that as it may, what Williams and his collaborators have put together has much to recommend as entertainment; and certainly it is a strong instance of 35below’s mission to produce work that provides an edgier complement to the more mainstream works produced upstairs at ACT. 

Short Order Durang, an evening of screen plays and one-acts by Christopher Durang. Directed by Jason Williams. Featuring Adam Arthur, Tabatha Hall, Ryan Madden, Stephanie Hickling, Anne-Marie Welty, Travis Kelly and Martin Cohn. Stage Manager / Light Board: Beth Mayo. Tehnical Direction: Matt Kaufman and Jill Summers. Set and Property Design: Jill Summers. Lighting Design: Jason Williams. Costume Design: Whitney Rayl. Sound Board Operator: Scott Carroll. Performances Thursdays through Saturdays, through Feb. 27, 7:30 pm, at 35below at Asheville Community Theatre, 35 E. Walnut St., Downtown Asheville. Tickets: $15/$10. Reservations highly recommended. 254-1320. Alcoholic beverages available for purchase at the show. www.ashevilletheatre.org

SHARE

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

7 thoughts on “Review of Short Order Durang

  1. Confused

    Are you critiquing the show or are you finding excuses for it? Was it a good show or a bad one? This was the vaguest and most contradictory review I have ever read.

  2. zomBgrl

    For those with the ears to hear, it’s pretty obvious Crutchfield didn’t like the show, but as usual, he’s being tactful and looking for what good he can find in it. Annoying, yes; “vague and contradictory,” no.

  3. Theatre Goer

    Mr.Crutchfield describes well what he saw and gives us the context we need to decide if it’s something we might want to see. It’s going to take Asheville theatre audiences/readers time to adjust to well-written, thoughtful reviews, from a knowledgeable reviewer who isn’t just showing off.

    “Criticism” isn’t just “thumbs up, “thumbs down,” “four stars,” “no stars. There’s a “take no prisoners” approach to reviewing. This isn’t that. Apparently the editor and writers for this theatre blog have decided to go with descriptive more than prescriptive.

    As ZomBgrl noted, you can kind of figure out how Mr Crutchfield rates the show. To this reader, I wouldn’t say he “didn’t like it.” He saw what the artists were trying to do, judged if they succeeded in their intention, noted when it had some sparkle and when it didn’t, and reserved his strongest judgment for the playwright, who can take his licks.

    Mr. Crutchfield’s gentle praise is believable (so far, he hasn’t piled on overblown adjectives like “awesome,” “effective,” “electric” or “riveting”). His criticisms are all the more believable because they are so measured.

    Has anyone seen the production? Comments on it from other audience members would be helpful.

  4. Avid Dramatist

    I think this is on of the more well rounded reviews I’ve read on this blog and feel pretty much the same way. (Maybe that’s why I feel it’s so well rounded.) If I hadn’t actually seen the show this review, while not praising it to the skies, would pique my interest. Thanks.

  5. visiting artist

    If we read between the lines the reviewer is very reserved here. He is not making excuses so much as reviewing the work in the context of “community theater” which we can possibly agree does not hold itself to the same standards as all levels of theater. I saw the show and believe that this reviewer did what he could to remark on the high and low points. There is no point in utterly bashing a bad theatrical experience in this context.

    In my view, most of the acting and much of the directing were unremarkable, with the actors constantly going in and out of focus. The reviewer does nail it with the mention of Ms. Hall, whose performance was the highlight for this audience member.

  6. me2thee

    While Confused was a bit harsh, it seems as though Crutchfield has a few die-hard fans in attendance. I enjoyed the show, save for the seeming lack of preparation, and thought it was true to the typical Durang style; over-the-top and slightly cheesy. I agree with most of this review but also found the first few paragraphs a bit weak. Crutchfield praises all of the actors and the director in various ways but seems to find fault in the playwright himself. Here Crutchfield contradicts himself twice. First by announcing that Durang has pedigree simply by being educated, second by saying that a ‘caricature’ is ‘exaggerated’ which is the very definition of a caricature. It was solid review; however, the critic seems to be a bit too involved in the theatre scene to be unbiased.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.