Appeals court rejects $10 million bond for Duke Energy critics

Press release from NC Warn Director Jim Warren:

Appeals Court Deals Blow to Duke Energy and Regulators in Power Plant Fight

Court rejects $10 million bond set by utilities commission that would have blocked critics’ chance to appeal Duke’s global warming machine

Late today the NC Court of Appeals dealt a rare blow to the state utilities commission and Duke Energy by reversing an order that would have blocked a court appeal of a controversial power plant in Asheville.

The court agreed with NC WARN and The Climate Times, who argued that a $10 million bond set by the commission as a condition of appealing the plant approval was not based on evidence.

The court essentially ordered the commission to conduct a proper proceeding over the bond issue instead of pulling multi-million dollar amounts out of its regulatory hat while not even requiring Duke to provide any evidence – or to even state – that our appeal would delay construction of the $1.1 billion project.

If the commission blows the issue again, the court could decide to accept the appeal without a bond – which would be entirely appropriate.

In approving the huge gas-fired power plant in a fast-track proceeding, the utilities commission ignored – and allowed Duke to ignore – affidavits from technical experts arguing that the plant is not needed, that the future supply and price of gas are highly risky, and that the plant would amplify greenhouse emissions at the worst possible time.

About Virginia Daffron
Managing editor, lover of mountains, native of WNC. Follow me @virginiadaffron

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.