Senator Burr introduces bill to protect educational and economic impact of historic estates

Here’s the press release from the office of Senator Burr:

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) introduced a bill that would amend current estate tax laws to protect historic landmarks and property from punitive taxes so that the public may continue to be enriched from the educational and historic benefits they provide. Currently, when the owner of a privately-held historic estate passes away, the owner’s family is often forced to sell the property in order to pay for the tax that is applied to it. This bill would require that estate taxes on the property be based on an ongoing business valuation rather than an asset valuation of the property. The goals of this legislation are to keep as many of these properties as possible in private ownership and allow them to continue to attract historic and educational tourism, which has a positive economic impact on the surrounding community, as well as preserve the historical value of the property.

“Current estate tax laws are unfairly punitive and can have a devastating impact on families. Even more, when this tax burden falls on properties that provide an economic benefit for the larger region, the effects can be felt by the entire community,” Senator Burr said. “We are a young nation, and we must preserve our National Historic Landmarks both for the benefit of Americans today as well as for future generations to enjoy and use as educational tools. It is my hope that this bill will result in historic properties being preserved for future public use and benefit rather than being sold to pay the exorbitant taxes on them.”

To meet the requirements to qualify under this bill, properties must have been on the register of National Historic Landmarks for at least 25 years, and they must have formerly been a family farm or private residence. Additionally, a commitment must be made to continue operating them for public visitation for at least 25 years after the death of the owner.

In North Carolina, the Biltmore Estate is a good example of the kind of property that would be negatively affected by current estate tax laws. In 2004 alone, over 868,000 people visited the Biltmore Estate, and these visitors contributed $260.5 million to the local economy in Asheville and the surrounding counties. These properties also stimulate the local economy through their employment of local individuals. In 2004, the Biltmore Corporation, for example, employed 1,040 people with a total economic impact stemming from payroll of over $49 million. There are close to 200 other properties nationwide, as well as their communities and their visitors, that could benefit from this legislation.

Original cosponsors of this legislation are Senators Kay Hagan (D-NC), Roger Wicker (R-MS), and Thad Cochran (R-MS).


Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

0 thoughts on “Senator Burr introduces bill to protect educational and economic impact of historic estates

  1. JW

    Although we are $15 Trillion in debt, our politicians continue doing favors for rich people. Throw these bums out of office.

    • bangarang867

      You obviously didn’t read the article. The estate tax bill is not a bailout or an earmark, it will tax these historic properties based on “ongoing business valuation rather than an asset valuation of the property”.

      If these historic properties, many of which are not “rich”, were taxed on their asset valuation, they would go bankrupt.

      If you continued reading, you would also understand the economic impact many of these historic properties have on the local communities they are in.

      Imagine a town like Asheville, where Biltmore Estate is, not having an economic impact of $260.5 million? It is the second largest employer in Asheville so imagine the 1,500 employees now unemployed due to the tax based on asset valuation.

      Get informed before you make an ignorant comment.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.