Food for thought: City Council candidates weigh in on local food policy

IMPORTANT ISSUES: City Council candidates (pictured behind the table, from left) Rich Lee, Julie Mayfield, Brian Haynes, Marc Hunt, Keith Young and Lindsey Simerly, shared their views on local food issues at a recent forum hosted by the Asheville Buncome Food Policy Council. Photo by Cindy Kunst

At an Oct. 12 forum hosted by the Asheville Buncombe Food Policy Council, the six candidates vying for three City Council seats responded to four long-form questions they’d been given in advance (see box).

The FPC, a volunteer organization, is charged with holding the city accountable to the commitments made in the Food Action Plan. Developed by the FBC and adopted by City Council in January 2013, the document commits Asheville to specific measures to relieve hunger, particularly in food-insecure areas. A 2013 report from the Food Research and Action Center, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, ranked the Asheville metro area ninth-worst in the nation for food insecurity, with more than 1 in 5 residents lacking money for food within the past year.

At the forum, all six candidates praised the work of the Food Policy Council and various local nonprofits.

Both Julie Mayfield and Vice Mayor Marc Hunt, the lone incumbent in the race, stressed the need to work more closely with state and county government. Hunt also called for a 25- to 30-year commitment by the city to “reshape public housing,” citing the planned reconstruction of Lee Walker Heights as an example of progress.

But Keith Young, the only African-American in the race, scoffed at that idea. “We don’t really have any traditional African-American communities left, and the highest concentration of African-Americans living in the city, anecdotally, probably reside in public housing,” said Young, a native of Asheville’s once-vibrant East End neighborhood who’s now a deputy clerk of Buncombe County Superior Court. “So I am not for the gentrification through a 15- to 30-year plan to continue to move us out of this area.”

The plan, he asserted, would also break up families and long-standing communities.

Candidate Rich Lee said: “I think the city needs to help form co-ops in food deserts and make them work. Ingles is not going to move in there by themselves.” Projects like the Interstate 26 expansion, he continued, “show that the disparate racial impacts carried out through redlining are still happening today. … One of the best things we can do is to help end the isolation of communities of color — not break them up but bring them back in.” Lee also stressed the connection between food insecurity and transportation issues. “It’s important to remember that inequality issues are transportation issues and food access issues. When we talk about affordability, I want people to remember that our ability to get around the town, and our isolation in food deserts, is a big part of that equation.”

Mayfield also spoke about transportation, noting, “The city’s first obligation is to the comunities and the people who have to ride the bus. The city, by deciding the routes and the times that buses run, gets to decide who gets to work where and how late; who gets to go to school, who gets to get to child care.”

The Food Action Plan, said Lindsey Simerly, wasn’t designed to be a magic bullet but was the first initiative of its kind to address food insecurity, adding that it needs to be updated. “When you’re anti-density and anti-development within the city limits, you’re encouraging sprawl, which eats up farmland,” said Simerly. “The city can lead by example in supporting urban agriculture by having edible plants in with some of the rest of our landscaping.” Parks and Recreation Department staff, however, have said that edible landscaping is too expensive to maintain.

Brian Haynes proposed partnering with churches to plant urban gardens, tipping his hat to groups such as Green Opportunities and Patchwork Urban Farms. “A bunch of what I’ve been doing tonight has really been just pointing out who I think is doing things right in the city,” he said. “Though I don’t have a lot of my own ideas on this subject, I consider myself a listener, and to me, the Food Policy Council knows more about this than anything I could throw out there.”

Food Policy Council members, however, say the city needs to step up and commit more resources to addressing these issues.

“We’d like to see our City Council take on the burden of supporting food policy, so our nonprofits don’t have to be as strapped for resources and time,” FPC coordinator Mary Ellen Lough explains.

Longtime FPC member Nicole Hinebaugh agrees. “Many of these organizations were named as being trusted, innovative and vital to the health and security of our city,” notes Hinebaugh, the program director for Asheville’s Bountiful Cities group. “Rather than asking these organizations to compete over [grant] dollars, why not cultivate new types of relationships with them, determine what kind of support they need to most effectively do their work, and then either provide or connect them with that support?”

These groups pursue support from federal community development block grants administered by the city, and since only 15 percent of the total amount the city receives can be used for these kinds of services, competition is fierce. Applicants typically get less than they ask for, and many requests aren’t funded at all.

“While words of support appear to be plentiful,” continues Hinebaugh, “it’s not fair or just to either nonprofits or the citizens of our city to offload responsibility for this work to organizations which are, in many cases, barely scraping by. … Simply put, trusted and valued organizations and programs shouldn’t have to pursue the dollars and connections in order to do the essential work government is unable or unwilling to do.”

Here is a recording of the forum in its entirety: 


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Jonathan Ammons
Native Asheville writer, eater, drinker, bartender and musician. Proprietor of Follow me @jonathanammons

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Food for thought: City Council candidates weigh in on local food policy

  1. OneWhoKnows

    a ‘food policy’ is NOT a function of OUR government.

    but kudos to Keith Young for speaking with the most intelligence above !!!

    Rich Lee: I-26 expansion = ‘redlining’ ??? really ??? are you kidding ???

Leave a Reply to OneWhoKnows ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.