After Life

Movie Information

In Brief: A thoroughly fascinating movie about the bureaucratic process of what happens after we die. The film's basic idea of the dead having to choose one single memory to take with them into eternity is conceptually fanciful and rather (deliberately) mundane in execution. This latter aspect causes part of the movie to become a little pokey, but the overall experience of the film is unique.
Genre: Fantasy Drama
Director: Hirokazu Koreeda
Starring: Arata, Erika Oda, Susumu Terajima, Kyôko Kagawa, Kei Tani
Rated: NR

Japanese filmmaker Hirokazu Koreeda’s notion of the afterlife as a bureaucracy was hardly original in 1998. Ferenc Molnár’s play Liliom (and its several film versions) and Sutton Vane’s play Outward Bound (and its film versions — not to mention Tim Burton’s more fanciful Beetlejuice) all got there first. Koreeda’s film, however, is a very different proposition, though one that bears similarities to its predecessor. The difference lies in this film’s approach. People — or presumably their spirits — arrive at a rather rundown building where they are assigned a caseworker. The caseworker — over the course of a week — then helps them to choose one single moment from their lives to take with them and the one with which they’ll spend eternity. But it doesn’t end there. The chosen memories have to be rather laboriously made into short films by the caseworkers in a makeshift movie studio. It is only after the dead have viewed these crafted memories that they move on. Koreeda’s approach is very workmanlike and straightforward. There are no mystical trappings or indeed any kind of mysticism. It’s all very businesslike and any traditional ideas about heaven and hell have no place in it. Oh, there are mysteries — some of which the film gives up as it plays out — but none are quite what we expect from such a story. A great deal of the film is made up of mundane interview footage — or what seems mundane. The film’s strength lies in the way these interviews inevitably trigger our own thoughts on the matter. I suspect it is impossible to watch the film and not wander off into your own thoughts as to what memory you would choose — and consider the enormity of such a task. This takes the idea of “thought-provoking” into an entirely different realm. Unfortunately, the scenes of the transformation of the memories into film don’t really live up to the other sections of the movie, but that’s a fairly minor quibble when placed alongside the way the exploration of the idea gets under your skin and haunts you long after the film ends.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.