Movie Information

The Story: Origin story for the Ant-Man character. The Lowdown: Cheeky, good-natured, clever and even a little on the subversive side, Ant-Man is that rarest of comic-book movies — one that manages to be personal and doesn't take itself too seriously. Its only real drawback is the insistence of tying it in with the Avengers series.
Genre: Comic Book Sci-Fi Action
Director: Peyton Reed (Down with Love)
Starring: Paul Rudd, Michael Douglas, Evangeline Lilly, Corey Stoll, Bobby Cannavale, Judy Greer, Michael Peña
Rated: PG-13



It may be in part that I have no reverence for the “Marvel Universe” — and had never even heard of Ant-Man when this film version was first announced — that I was pretty delighted by Peyton Reed’s film. But I suspect my enjoyment of Ant-Man has more to do with the fact that it feels genuinely quirky and — special effects to one side — hand-made. Thankfully, it doesn’t take itself particularly seriously — with that title, how could it? It’s not in the least bit one of those comic-book movies that’s unrelentingly grim — or that thinks it’s the second coming of Shakespeare — but it’s sufficiently smart that it evidences enough heart to appeal to a broad audience with likable characters. It’s pretty constantly amusing without leaning too heavily on big gags. In other words, it’s a good time at the movies and doesn’t really pretend to be anything else. I’m pretty happy with that.




Ant-Man is one of those unfortunate films that a lot of people seem to be judging not for what it is, but for what it isn’t. The “what it isn’t” is an Edgar Wright film, though Wright and his writing partner, Joe Cornish, do get screenplay credit (along with Adam McKay and the film’s star Paul Rudd). Yes, it started out life as Wright’s film, so a little resentment is understandable. At the same time, I’m reminded of the complaints I heard when Wright’s usual stars, Simon Pegg and Nick Frost, made Paul with another director — that it would have been better if Wright had made it. I was unsure of that then, and I’m unsure of that now with Ant-Man.




Setting aside such speculation (we’re only guessing at what Wright’s film might have been) and looking at the film Peyton Reed delivered, what I see is a surprisingly stylish film — the first such for Reed since 2003’s Down with Love — that gets the best out of the script at hand. How much of this is due to the original screenplay is hard to say, but much that works seems to be the result of the direction. Did the screenplay detail the running gag of having Michael Peña do all the voices in the flashbacks when he tells rambling stories? Maybe, but Reed pulls the gag off. Similarly, the way film makes sport of and subverts that hoariest of comic-book-movie conventions (the tiresome hero-villain smackdown) by undercutting big moments with changes of scale is a masterstroke that is handled perfectly — and it puts much of it on the refreshing and charming basis of playing with toys. For this alone, I cherish the film’s existence.




The story is essentially comic-book basic with not-really-a-criminal ex-con Scott Lang (Rudd) being driven to a life of crime when he finds work after prison hard to come by. This may have some social commentary, but that’s hard to tell in the film’s context because it’s hard to tell just when Dr. Hank Pym (Michael Douglas) begins to manipulate Rudd’s life to get him to sign on as Ant-Man. Even so, while Ant-Man has an emotional core, it isn’t exactly deep. Neither does it purport to be. As a story, what we get is a basic tale that’s structured as a heist film. However, it’s grounded more in Pym getting back at protege-turned-nemesis Darren Cross (Corey Stoll) and preventing him from taking over Pym’s research and perverting it into the kind of evil thing such comic-book villains are prone to. What makes it work are the characters and the overall quirky tone.




It doesn’t all quite work, through no fault of its own, but because of the fact that everything in the Marvel Universe just has to somehow tie into the damned Avengers. Ant-Man strains against this — even making a joke at the expense of the bloated climax of Avengers: Age of Ultron — and could almost be a stand-alone movie. (It requires only the slightest familiarity with the Avengers to follow it.) But the overall Marvel trajectory dictates that Scott/Ant-Man has to at least be led to a point where he can become a part of their Superheropaloozas. That’s too bad because its connection to the Avengers is its least appealing aspect. Ignore it as much as you can, enjoy it for what it gets right and you should have a good time. Rated PG-13 for sci-fi action violence.


About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

8 thoughts on “Ant-Man

  1. Edwin Arnaudin

    Yet another Ant-Man review that doesn’t mention Honey, I Shrunk the Kids. For shame!

  2. T.rex

    This was a lot of fun, perfect for a matinee to escape the heat. Besides being a fun time it has something that few of these comic book movies do, a wonderful third act that doesn’t let you down. Some of it borders on tripy and Im sure that was the big chunk left by Edgar Wright. ( a minor spoiler coming……..) How about those de-aging cgi effects on Douglass in the prologue? Looked like he stepped off the Wall Street set. Stay for the stingers everyone, they are good ones.

  3. Big Al

    Being considerably lighter in its’ mood, taking itself less seriously, and being barely connected to “The Avengers” franchise made this the ONLY Marvel Comics adaptation that I could have taken my parents to (both pushing 70) with the result that they enjoyed the hell out of it. We could use a few more of these. And Mom LOVED (and cannot figure out) how they managed to de-age Michael Douglas.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.