The Change-Up

Movie Information

The Story: Two old friends wish for each other's lives, only to actually get their wish. The Lowdown: Tired, tasteless, unfunny take on the body-swap comedy.
Genre: Body-swap Comedy
Director: David Dobkin (Fred Claus)
Starring: Ryan Reynolds, Jason Bateman, Leslie Mann, Olivia Wilde, Alan Arkin
Rated: R

David Dobkin—aided and abetted by screenwriters Jon Lucas and Scott Moore (The Hangover, Ghosts of Girlfriends Past)—set out the prove that the body-swapping comedy not dead. If it wasn’t already dead—and Mark Waters’ successful Freaky Friday remake in 2003 suggests it wasn’t all that dead—they have not only killed it, but mutilated the corpse by a desperate attempt to raunch it up. Despite one good scene, an amusing awareness of the sexual side of inhabiting someone else’s body, and a funny final exchange between the two leads based on that awareness, this is a movie where pretty nearly everything is just plain wrong.

Let’s start with the casting. Now, I like Jason Bateman fine, and even though I think Ryan Reynolds peaked in Blade: Trinity (2004), I have nothing against him. The problem is that I’m not buying them as having been friends since third grade—unless Reynolds was in third grade and Bateman was in high school. Sure, there’s only a seven-year age difference between the two, but it’s a difference that really shows here. That to one side, the fact is the film hands them two not-very-likable characters (read: jerks) and expects them to coast through it on their own innately pleasant screen personas—and it doesn’t work.

Then there’s the raunch factor. I don’t in the least have an aversion to swearing—as those who know me will be glad to attest, I’m sure—but these people swear like amateurs, or like 12-year-olds who just learned a “bad” word and want to impress people. The nonstop, random and often peculiar permutations of “f**k” feel forced and awkward—and certainly not funny to anyone past the level of Beavis and Butthead. And is sex with a nine-month-pregnant woman really funny? Of course, there’s always that old standby—gross-out humor. There’s no shortage here. One might even say that the film is almost fixated on bodily functions. I suppose it should be noted that it’s pretty upfront about this, since in the movie’s first scene Jason Bateman gets hit in the face with projectile baby diarrhea (you saw this in the trailer), followed by him getting a mouthful of it (that wasn’t in the trailer). You know—intellectual humor.

The plot? Well, it’s not much of anything. Old friends Mitch (Reynolds) and Dave (Bateman) take a leak in a park fountain while wishing they had each other’s life. Cue thunder and lightning—and they wake up in each other’s body. Deciding they can reverse the process by repeating their assault on the makeshift urinal, they find it’s been taken away for “restoration,” which leads to much bureaucratic nonsense just to track the damned thing down. Meanwhile they must try to live each other’s lives. Originality is not high here.

On the vague plus side, Leslie Mann has one funny scene where she unloads her troubles on a hapless baby-sitter. Also, somewhere around the last reel, director Dobkin has a mysterious outburst of stylishness—and this after he really botched an opportunity for a clever montage—that makes the picture briefly interesting as filmmaking. And there’s the previously mentioned business of the sexuality awareness brought about by being in someone else’s body. But none of this is enough to make this mess worth sitting through, especially since the rest of it is so utterly dire. Rated R for pervasive strong crude sexual content and language, some graphic nudity and drug use.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

5 thoughts on “The Change-Up

  1. Ken Hanke

    Last year felt better, but that was mostly due to when the art titles made it into town.

  2. Michael D Walker

    I went to see The Change-Up despite Ken’s review.
    Not because I don’t trust Ken’s opinion, which I do–except for his choice of smoking jackets–but because I am a Thorne Smith fan and wanted to review it for my web site.

    Ultimately, Ken’s review was dead on the money.
    So much so I linked to it from my site.

    The F-bombs were so unnnecessary and there’s no way those two guys are the same age. And some of the visual pranks were disgusting to say the least.

    And this could’ve been so much better given the talent in the film. I think it can be summed up in the phrase “what a wasted opportunity” especially when you give Alan Arkin nothing to do in his scant appearances in the film.

    Going back to watch “Grosse Point Blank” to see Alan Arkin work in a intelligently designed role.


  3. Ken Hanke

    It’s not like you weren’t warned!

    By the way, did you ever post my Topper Returns article?

  4. luluthebeast

    They should have just been electrocuted when they were peeing in the fountain.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.