Richard Marquand’s Eye of the Needle (1981) is a type of thriller not often seen these days. For that matter, it was rather unusual even in 1981. It’s largely — for at least half its length — a fairly standard World War II spy yarn, and some of the setup gets a little tedious. Donald Sutherland plays Faber, a murderous Nazi agent known as “the Needle” because of his tendency to dispose of anyone who gets in his way — or might get in his way — with a well-placed stiletto. A great deal of the film deals with him uncovering the details of the plans for the Allied invasion of France, and the dummy airfield set up for the express purpose of throwing the Germans off the scene as to the real invasion route. All of this is OK without ever being particularly compelling. Let’s face it, it’s not the easiest subject to milk for suspense since we know from history that he can’t succeed. Once he’s marooned on a small island with handicapped sheep farmer David (Chistopher Cazenova), his wife Lucy (Kate Nelligan) and their daughter, the story takes on a completely different tone by virtue of Faber’s relationship with Lucy. In this stretch, we start to see more of Faber as a human being — and get hints into how he may have become the utterly ruthless and seemingly unfeeling person he is now. The film doesn’t use this reduce his menace, but it adds considerably the emotional weight of both his actions and those of Lucy. It’s never a great film, but it is definitely an entertaining one. The real question, however, is what about this film caused George Lucas to decide Marquand should helm Star Wars: Episode VI — Return of the Jedi (1983)? Look fast to catch Bill Nighy as an RAF Squadron Leader late in the film.
Before you comment
The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.