Four Sided Triangle

Movie Information

The Hendersonville Film Society will show Four Sided Triangle at 2 p.m. Sunday, Nov. 7, in the Smoky Mountain Theater at Lake Pointe Landing Retirement Community (behind Epic Cinemas), 333 Thompson St., Hendersonville.
Score:

Genre: Science Fiction/Romance
Director: Terence Fisher (Horror of Dracula)
Starring: Barbara Payton, James Hayter, Stephen Murray, John Van Eyssen, Percy Marmont
Rated: NR

Pre-horror Hammer, Terence Fisher’s Four Sided Triangle (1953) is essentially an OK little science-fiction opus that is more interesting in terms of what it portends than for what it actually accomplishes. When all is said and done, the film is a somewhat more scientific (and more budget-minded) variant on Bride of Frankenstein (1935) that finally comes across as a kind of insect-free forerunner of The Fly (1959). Considering the rather loopy premise—a device that can duplicate anything is used to duplicate the woman (Barbara Payton) the scientist (Stephen Murray) loves—the film is surprisingly sober. That, unfortunately, is not entirely in its favor, though it does give Four Sided Triangle a very unusual tone for 1950s sci-fi.

The basic concept is to approach a science-fiction story as a kind of character study. When you consider most of the sci-fi that had been made up to the time of Four Sided Triangle, that’s a pretty radical idea. The problem with it is that neither the main characters nor the actors portraying them are all that interesting. Put it this way, when your most compelling performer is Barbara Payton—best known for that sterling film Bride of the Gorilla (1951)—you have a problem. It doesn’t help that the male leads—Stephen Murray and John Van Eyssen (the latter best known as Jonathan in the 1958 Horror of Dracula)—are simply not very attractive. But the biggest fault is in the writing. Since the screenplay seems incapable of actually affording much in the way of characterization for the two men, it’s compelled to resort to a sympathetic narrator (James Hayter) to tell us what they’re like.

On the plus side, Terence Fisher gets as much out of the film—and a budget that somewhat aptly installs its “mad scientist” lab in a barn—as is possible (aided in no small degree by the Malcolm Arnold musical score). His laboratory scenes in particular do a good job of making it seem like something more impressive is going on than really is. But there’s only so much he can do with a screenplay that has trouble not making a scant 81 minutes feel padded. The film takes half its length to even get to the central idea of duplicating La Payton—which is tastefully, though very improbably, done with her fully clothed. Still, the film is interesting and considerably better than its relative obscurity in the Hammer filmography might suggest.

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Four Sided Triangle

  1. DrSerizawa

    A movie about Barbara Payton herself would be more entertaining than any movie she was in. Though I did kind of like Raymond Burr as devolved into a gorilla.

  2. Ken Hanke

    Though I did kind of like Raymond Burr as devolved into a gorilla.

    Could you tell the difference?

  3. DrSerizawa

    A stampede of devolved Raymond Burrs would improve any movie even more than a stampede of monkeys would, I think.

  4. Ken Hanke

    A stampede of devolved Raymond Burrs would improve any movie even more than a stampede of monkeys would, I think.

    That goes ever so slightly too far.

Leave a Reply to DrSerizawa ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.