The Hound of the Baskervilles

Movie Information

In Brief: The most famous of all Sherlock Holmes stories gets the Hammer horror treatment — not inappropriate for a tale about a hound from hell — and the results are very good indeed. In fact, this 1959 film may well be the best version of The Hound of the Baskervilles. It is certainly the most unnerving version and one of the only films to present Holmes (Peter Cushing) as a twitchy, arrogant drug-addict. The well-known story lends itself nicely to the spooky treatment, it looks terrific and the performances could scarcely be bettered. The Hendersonville Film Society will show The Hound of the Baskervilles Sunday, Aug. 24, at 2 p.m. in the Smoky Mountain Theater at Lake Pointe Landing Retirement Community (behind Epic Cinemas), 333 Thompson St., Hendersonville.
Score:

Genre: Mystery Thriller
Director: Terence Fisher
Starring: Peter Cushing, André Morell, Christopher Lee, Marla Landi, Francis de Wolff, Miles Malleson
Rated: NR

hound4

 

“A SIGHT TO SHATTER THE NERVES! A STORY TO STUN THE SENSES!”

“Never Has The Night Known A Beast Like This!”

“IT’S THE PICTURE ABOUT THAT BONE-CHILLING HOWL!

It’s Ten Times The Terror in TECHNICOLOR!

All of the above plus two sets of prodigious bosoms, letters dripping blood, and a large, very wishful-thinking depiction of the hound’s head with glowing eyes and blood-dripping jaws and better-to-eat-you-with teeth was crammed onto the original half-sheet poster for Hammer Films’ take on the best-known of all Sherlock Holmes stories. (Tastefulness was, after all, a Hammer trademark.) It was certainly an attention-grabber — maybe too much so. (I used to own that poster, but gave it away because I didn’t like looking at it.) Sure, it was swell for branding the picture as a new horror movie starring Peter Cushing and Christopher Lee, but as the first film in a proposed series of Sherlock Holmes movies, it was perhaps less well-judged. The fact that no such series materialized after this one lost money, suggests as much. The pity is that — apart from a few horror-oriented embellishments of the Hammer kind — the 1959 Hound of the Baskervilles is a really good Sherlock Holmes movie. Judged as a film, it’s likely the best version — certainly better and more atmospheric than the more famous 1939 one that made Basil Rathbone and Nigel Bruce into the best-known Holmes and Watson of all time.

 

hound2

 

Though I’m not the world’s biggest Hammer fan, I admit that I’m probably a little prejudiced toward Terence Fisher’s Hound because it was the first version of the story I saw. I remember seeing it with a group of friends on TV on a Saturday afternoon and being pretty captivated by everything except the prologue (which has sense grown on me). One of our number was a young lady I was rather sweet on, and she called the movie “unnerving.” To this day, I think that’s probably the single best word to describe it. I didn’t realize at the time — I think I was 14 — that much of what made it so was Fisher’s direction and his use of color. But that — combined with the effectively bombastic James Bernard musical score, the production design by Bernard Robinson, Andre Morell’s Watson, and Cushing’s take on Holmes — is a key factor. (Christopher Lee is rather wasted in the role of Sir Henry Baskerville, and is a bit too stiff and proper to be believable as a man of passion transfixed by Marla Landi’s peasant pulchritude.)

 

hound3

 

Cushing’s Holmes is a striking departure from the usual portrayal. It’s not just that he captures the character’s arrogance — to the point of making him not very likable — but it’s that Cushing plays Holmes as a pasty-faced, twitchy drug addict. Though Holmes’ drug use was never ignored — to the degree that the censors allowed — Cushing is the only actor I’ve seen play him as an addict. What’s interesting about this is that no mention is made of the detective’s cocaine addiction in the film. (Even the ’39 Hound managed to slip, “Oh, Watson, the needle,” past the censors as Holmes’ curtain line.) Cushing — and one presumes, Fisher — seems to just take it as a given. It makes for an interesting variation, and it helps explain the character’s extravagant and short-tempered qualities. By itself, this makes this Hound worth seeing — even if you know the story all too well — but there are other aspects of the film that make it one of the better Sherlock Holmes movies.

The Hendersonville Film Society will show The Hound of the Baskervilles Sunday, Aug. 24, at 2 p.m. in the Smoky Mountain Theater at Lake Pointe Landing Retirement Community (behind Epic Cinemas), 333 Thompson St., Hendersonville.

SHARE
About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

11 thoughts on “The Hound of the Baskervilles

  1. Chip Kaufmann

    Although not part of the official Conan Doyle canon, THE 7% SOLUTION and Nicol Williamson portray Holmes as one pretty addicted detective.

  2. Chip Kaufmann

    And indeed it isn’t, but the review reads “Cushing is the only actor I’ve seen play him as an addict”. You didn’t specify “in the original stories”

  3. Ken Hanke

    I don’t even accept it as Holmes, though. I like Peter Cook better.

  4. It is indeed a shame that further Fisher Holmes films never eventuated (aside from that odd Lee-starring German language thing). Cushing is absolutely magnetic in this, and even thought he did great work as Holmes in the BBC TV series a few years later, I think the team of him, Fisher and Morell was hard to top.

    This and the Howard Hawks directed THE BIG SLEEP are the two films that I’m most disappointed didn’t generate franchises.

  5. Yeah, but I wanted a Bogart-starring FAREWELL MY LOVELY, THE HIGH WINDOW, THE LADY IN THE LAKE and (especially) THE LONG GOODBYE.

  6. Dionysis

    The Cushing BBC Holmes series was mentioned; it is interesting to compare Cushing’s movie version of Holmes in this tale to the way he portrayed Holmes in the BBC adaptation of the same story. Cushing was a lot less animated and energetic (no cocaine?) a Holmes in the television version than he was in the film version. I agree that this is probably the best take of ‘Hound…’

  7. Chip Kaufmann

    Cushing would play Holmes one last time (when he was 71) in the 1984 TV movie MASKS OF DEATH with John Mills as Watson.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.