Saw V

Movie Information

The Story: The Jigsaw Killer saga continues with the aid of the old boy's previously unknown other protégé. The Lowdown: It's Halloween. There's a new Saw picture. It's crap. Next question.
Genre: Torture Porn
Director: David Hackl
Starring: Costas Mandylor, Scott Patterson, Betsy Russell, Julie Benz, Meagan Good
Rated: R

Lionsgate—you know, the folks who are just too darned classy to give this year’s The Midnight Meat Train a proper release—dumped the latest installment of the torture-porn cash cow, Saw V, into no less than 3,060 theaters on Friday. And, of course, since it’s Halloween season, people flocked to it—although, despite this, it appears that Disney’s High School Musical 3 tap-danced all over its bloody carcass, securing the top spot at the box office. (Now, if the two films could somehow be combined, they might be onto something.) The ad campaign for Saw V assures the viewer, “You won’t believe how it ends.” This is true, because you won’t believe it could possibly be this lame, even though it is. Less truthful is the promotional image of someone wearing a mask made of Jigsaw’s (Tobin Bell) face. No such thing occurs in the film. Perhaps it’s allegorical, but that seems like a pretty big word for the people making these movies to know.

Even granting that the Saw pictures have always been the no-frills franchise of fear flicks—they’re as generic as Chicago album titles; just number the damn things and ship ‘em—Saw V is notably threadbare. There are more flashbacks to previous movies than you’d find in the average “economy chapter” of an old Republic serial, where recycled footage from earlier chapters was strung together to make sure everyone remembers the story thus far. The rationale behind this “previously on Saw” approach is that we’re learning how the late Mr. Jigsaw recruited, trained and used detective Mark Hoffman (Costas Mandylor) to help him in his work—and now to carry on in the same tradition. No, that’s not a spoiler—it’s in the official promotional synopsis and is revealed early on anyway.

This is all intertwined with FBI agent Strahm (Scott Patterson)—who evaded one of Jigsaw’s traps by giving himself a tracheotomy with his handy Bic pen, which doubles as a breathing tube (good thing he doesn’t carry a pencil)—trying to uncover the truth of it all. There’s also some red herring-ness (that may or may not be designed to lead to the already announced Saw VI) involving Mr. Saw’s widow (Betsy Russell), who inherits a never-revealed mysterious box (I’m voting for a collection of sex toys) from her late husband. And, of course, there’s the standard-issue collection of unlikable meat-on-the-hoof characters being put through their gory paces via one of Jigsaw’s “redemption” schemes—complete with videotaped instructions from that increasingly ridiculous Howdy-Doody-of-Horror puppet.

None of this should matter, though, because let’s face it: These movies exist solely for the torture-porn sequences that are too often mistaken for horror these days. Problem with that—apart from the aesthetic and moral speciousness inherent in the approach—is there’s nothing all that new here. The pit-and-the-pendulum opening might have been effective (it’s certainly bloody enough), but the constant close-ups of the screaming victim (Joris Jarsky) become laughable, and the post-production visual jiggery-pokery does the scene no favors. The rest of it is in the more-of-the-same realm of horrific ho-hummery. Even the flashbacks to Jigsaw’s Greatest Hits are on the lame-and-tame side, while the series’ most notoriously gag-inducing death device—the vat of pureed rancid pig from Saw III (2006)—is conspicuously absent.

I’m sure there’s some appeal here for hardcore fans of the series. (Thank goodness, one was in the audience to remind me that the avoirdupois-afflicted fellow in his boxer shorts trapped in barbed wire was from the first film. I feel better knowing that.) I cannot imagine Saw V being of any value to anyone else, though it is admittedly somewhat easier to follow than all the cluttered, shifting time lines in last year’s entry. Perhaps the whole thing is somehow educational. You, too, can become a colorful serial killer if you have a good deal of money, a penchant for Rube Goldberg killing/maiming machines and unlimited access to old, dark labyrinthian warehouses. Whether this is useful knowledge is another matter. Rated R for sequences of grisly bloody violence and torture, language and brief nudity.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

8 thoughts on “Saw V

  1. What has to happen to get Lion’s Gate to stop releasing these damn movies? Besides the obvious bottoming out of box office of course.

  2. Ken Hanke

    What has to happen to get Lion’s Gate to stop releasing these damn movies? Besides the obvious bottoming out of box office of course.

    I think you just answered your own question.

  3. Sean Williams

    What has to happen to get Lion’s Gate to stop releasing these damn movies?

    I vote we drop the producers into a vat of rancid pig juices.

  4. Daffyd K Jones

    Avoirdupois-afficlted? Can’t you just say fat? That doesn’t even make sense? It’s like you used a thesaurus without really knowing what the word means

  5. Mummer

    I have to admit that I had to look up “Avoirdupois-afflicted,” but I can’t say I was particularly bothered by its use.

    On a related note, an incidental Google result while looking that up revealed an Internet forum apparently dedicated to these movies. Some people don’t just enjoy these movies, some people apparently consider them some kind of art, with an important message on top of that.

    I, uh… I really don’t know what more I can say. I think that fact alone is more horrifying than all five of these movies combined.

  6. Ken Hanke

    I, uh… I really don’t know what more I can say. I think that fact alone is more horrifying than all five of these movies combined

    Seems pretty unarguable to me.

  7. Will

    Would it be remotely feasable to alter the system and make it allow a zero-star rating in time for Saw VI?

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.