Movie Information

The Story: A team of scientists is on its way to attempt to reignite our dying sun with a nuclear bomb. The Lowdown: Visually stunning, dramatically exciting and philosophically intriguing, Danny Boyle's Sunshine is a must-see.
Genre: Science Fiction
Director: Danny Boyle
Starring: Cillian Murphy, Chris Evans, Michelle Yeoh, Rose Byrne, Benedict Wong
Rated: R

Even though it’s only September and a lot of the year’s potentially most interesting films have yet to be released, I feel pretty safe in saying that Danny Boyle’s Sunshine will very likely be on the top half of my Ten Best list come year’s end. Nothing this year—with the exception of Talk to Me—has made such a profound impression on me.

Not being much of a science fiction fan, my interest in seeing the film lay entirely in the fact that it was made by Danny Boyle, a filmmaker who has yet to make a film devoid of interest since he hit the international film scene with the preposterously entertaining Shallow Grave in 1994. And most of the time—Trainspotting (1996), 28 Days Later … (2002), Millions (2004)—his films have been a lot more than interesting. Plus, they’ve invariably been surprising. Although the obvious product of a single strong sensibility, the variety of subject and tone found in Boyle’s oeuvre is astonishing. From the showy, cynical entertainment of Shallow Grave to the stylized grunge of Trainspotting to the intense terror of 28 Days Later … to the gently whimsical fantasy of Millions, Boyle has constantly expanded expectations. And Sunshine is no exception. Boyle has taken the science fiction genre and made it his own.

Thinking back, I don’t exactly know what I expected from Sunshine, but it wasn’t the film I got. I never expected the film to be as dramatically intense, philosophically intriguing or emotionally resonant as it is. If pressed for a one-line summation of my feelings, I’d settle for saying it reminded me of a more exciting 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) with characters I actually cared about in place of Kubrick’s ciphers. Alternatively, it’s a bit like Darren Aronofsky’s The Fountain (2006), but with a more traditional narrative.

As usual, Boyle takes elements from other movies and reconfigures them to create something at once familiar and strange. In a sense, he’s a very post-modern filmmaker, tapping into, deconstructing, referencing or building on a cornucopia of pop culture. I’ve seen this cause him to be dismissed as derivative in some quarters, but really the history of art in general resembles a rogues’ gallery of thievery—and like the truly great artistic brigands throughout history, he generally leaves more than he took.

There’s nothing particularly original or compelling about the setup of Sunshine. In an unspecified future, our sun is dying, so a team of scientists are traveling to it with a nuclear device the size of Manhattan with which they may be able to reignite the failing star by creating a star within the star. The specifics may be different, but as a basic idea it’s as old as science fiction: a group of scientists out to save the Earth from impending disaster. Conceptually, it might be Armageddon (1998) or The Core (2003) or even Flash Gordon (1936). Thankfully, in practice it’s none of those.

Boyle doesn’t downplay the visual elements in the least. In fact, he has created the most visually dazzling picture of the year. However, the strength of the film lies in its humanity. Sunshine boasts quite possibly the most fascinating and believably human characters of any sci-fi film I can remember, and actors the caliber of Cillian Murphy, Michelle Yeoh, Troy Garrity and even Chris Evans do them complete justice. The blend of humanity—frailty, ego, idealism, guilt and the capacity for self-sacrifice—is presented in great complexity, as is the possibility of rebirth into something more than human.

The film’s distinctly metaphysical nature—aspects of which can be read as either atheistic or nonspecifically deistic, as you prefer—is unusually daring for a mainstream film and deeply haunting. Yet Sunshine never gets preachy. It’s too smart a movie for that. Boyle and screenwriter Alex Garland (28 Days Later …) have fashioned a work that never once shorts the viewer in terms of suspense or excitement. That it uses these elements to turn itself into something much more is why it’s one of the few great films of recent vintage. Rated R for violent content and language.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

5 thoughts on “Sunshine

  1. Sunday

    I just got around to seeing this film and I agree, for the most part. However, I found the subplot of the saboteur from the first mission completely unnecessary. The film would’ve been stronger had it been about the mission through to the end. While hardly fatal, that “twist” was clumsy.

  2. Ken Hanke

    You’re not alone in that view, even though it’s one I don’t personally hold. It never struck me that it was a subplot, but an integral part of the story from the first.

  3. Sunday

    Maybe so…(not a subplot). I’m not sure it added anything substantive to a strong first 2/3 of the film, though.

  4. Ken Hanke

    I think a lot of what bothers people is that the tone shifts and part of that last section plays out like a horror picture. It didn’t bother me, but I know it bothered a lot of people. The revelation of the saboteur character, however, ties in with the character on the ship we’re who’s also being dazzled by or drawn into the sun’s hold. But in all honesty, I’d really need to watch the film again to seriously debate that.

  5. Whatever feelings viewers have about the saboteur subplot (which I can actually forgive as far as the film’s philosophical pretensions are concerned), I have to say that Danny Boyle’s SUNSHINE is probably the best science-fiction film I have seen in a long time, and that it’s going to be a long while to find something to surpass it that is just as brilliant, both conceptually and visually. It’s also probably the best disaster movie I’ve ever seen, second only to 1961’s equally brilliant but effects-restrained THE DAY THE EARTH CAUGHT FIRE – my candidate for GREATEST DISASTER MOVIE OF ALL TIME!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.