The Lunchbox

Movie Information

The Story: When a young wife's special lunch for her husband is mistakenly delivered to another, older man, an increasingly intimate correspondence ensues.  The Lowdown: Charming, quietly funny, elegantly made and sometimes heartbreakingly perceptive, The Lunchbox is one of 2014's must-see films. Stars Irrfan Khan and Nimrat Kaur are marvelous.
Genre: Romantic Comedy Drama
Director: Ritesh Batra
Starring: Irrfan Khan, Nimrat Kaur, Nawazuddin Siddiqui, Lillete Dunbey, Nakul Vaid, Shruti Bapna
Rated: PG-13


Chances are the only name you might know in the cast list is Irrfan Khan, who played the police inspector in Slumdog Millionaire (2008), the grieving father in The Darjeeling Limited (2007) and the older Pi in Life of Pi (2012). It’s much less likely that you will be familiar with writer-director Ritesh Batra, as this is his first feature film. But don’t let the  lack of a brand name — or the fact that The Lunchbox is partly in Hindi with subtitles — keep you from seeing this slyly comic, bittersweet romance. It’s a captivating charmer of surprising depth and complexity — something you’re not likely to get from a bare reading of its improbable and frankly contrived plot. The whole premise is built on the concept of a young married woman, Ila (Nimrat Kaur), trying to reignite the spark in her marriage by creating special lunches to be delivered to her husband, Rajeev (Nakul Vaid). The lunches, however, end up being delivered to a widowed, 50-ish accountant, Saajan Fernandes (Khan), who is on the verge of early retirement.




The setup sounds like a variant on one of those Astaire-Rogers movies where Ginger thinks Fred is somebody else, but The Lunchbox moves into territory that feels more like David Jones’ 84 Charing Cross Road (1987) than a musical comedy. Plus, the film’s Mumbai setting — and the use of the city’s elaborate system of dabbawallahs who efficiently deliver lunches — give it a unique feeling. In truth, this system of picking up and delivering a bewildering array of lunches is so noted for its accuracy that it generated a Harvard University study. Of course, the possibility of a mistake is the crux of the film’s situation. It only takes the one meal for Ila to discover the mistake — Rajeev describes a completely different meal than the one she sent — and she decides to repeat the attempt. This time, however, she includes a note to the unknown recipient. She doesn’t upbraid him for eating the lunch but thanks him for briefly making her feel that she’d accomplished her aim (in reference to the completely emptied containers). Sajaan writes back, and an unlikely correspondence ensues between the lonely man and the neglected wife.



Yes, it follows something of the path you probably expect, but it does so with a deft touch and such surprising grace that any preditability is not only forgivable, it simply doesn’t matter. Plus, there’s much more to the story than its bare bones. The film not only gives us glimpses into the individual lives of its two main characters, but it includes a touching secondary story about Saajan’s relationship with his too-eager replacement trainee, Shaikh (Nawazuddin Siddiqui). In fact, this is so much an outgrowth of the central story, that it’s unfair to call this aspect of the film secondary. If it wasn’t for Ila’s notes and his resulting new interest in life, Saajan probably wouldn’t have thawed toward the annoying young man. Much of what follows is the result of Saajan’s growing, almost fatherly friendship with Shaikh. For that matter, Shaikh’s saying that “sometimes the wrong train takes you to the right station” is central to the film and might be viewed as the film’s message.




Search all you like, I doubt you will find a false note in The Lunchbox. Everything interconnects beautifully. It’s not just the way the film holds onto its food motif in a way that never feels forced, but everything in it is relevant to its overall story and theme. Even Ila’s mother’s (Lillete Dubey) confession about how she became “disgusted” by her husband once he became ill and had to be taken care of carries a broader implication. I don’t want to say much more about the story itself. I do, however, want to encourage you to seek out this beautifully made and acted little gem of a movie. You will not regret it, and I think I’ve just found one more 2014 release that will be on my Ten Best list. Rated PG-13 for thematic material and smoking.

Starts Friday at Fine Arts Theatre

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

9 thoughts on “The Lunchbox

    • Edwin Arnaudin

      C’mon, Ken. Didn’t you see the huge Coen influence on The Lunchbox?

  1. Ken Hanke

    At this moment, I am prepared to blame the new website with much, but this…perhaps not.

  2. Me

    It was probably me, i think what i did was click on the first post which is now the featured film of the week instead of the weekly reeler.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.