Movie Information

The Story: Dramatic recreation of the events of the 2004 60 Minutes story that destroyed the careers of Dan Rather and Mary Mapes. The Lowdown: Surprisingly effective as drama and thought-provoking on every other level, Truth only stumbles owing to a tendency to preach, but not enough to sink the film.
Genre: Fact-Based Drama
Director: James Vanderbilt
Starring: Cate Blanchett, Robert Redford, Topher Grace, Dennis Quaid, Elisabeth Moss, Bruce Greenwood, Stacy Keach
Rated: R



James Vanderbilt’s Truth is a fact-based account of the story behind the fall of venerable CBS news anchor Dan Rather and 60 Minutes producer Mary Mapes (Cate Blanchett) over the report that George W. Bush used family influence to stay out of the Vietnam War by getting into an elite unit of the National Guard. Notice the term “fact-based,” which is to say that the film is a dramatization, not a documentary (not that documentaries don’t fudge things to make their points). As such, how much you want to take it at face value is a personal call. CBS  is so outraged over the film that they have refused to run ads for it. That’s not too surprising, since the film paints an unflattering picture of the company. The film has also set off a small frenzy among right-leaning bloggers and Internet commenters (and the inevitable outburst from the New York Post‘s Kyle Smith, who calls it “wacko”), which is also not surprising. At the same time, this kind of outrage only serves to increase my natural (and admittedly left-leaning) tendency to side with the film — even while thinking both sides overstate the case of what might have happened had the piece not been discredited.




Frankly, I was surprised by how much I liked the film. My interest level in the story was minimal, my faith in TV journalism shaky at best, and my desire to see the directorial debut of the guy whose career started with the screenplay for the execrable 2003 horror movie Darkness Falls nonexistent — especially at a 9 a.m. press screening on a Saturday morning. The fact that I have been less than overwhelmed by Robert Redford’s performances for some time didn’t help matters. So it was almost startling to see Redford create a wholly compelling character, especially out of a public figure like Dan Rather. The film’s screen time clearly favors top-billed Cate Blanchett (and she is typically excellent), but in a very real sense it’s Redford who holds the film in place — just by exerting a quiet authority and sense of innate decency.




The problem with tackling a story like this isn’t that it’s still something of political hot potato — that may in fact be in its favor — but that its outcome is known from the beginning. We go in knowing that Rather’s and Mapes’ careers are going to be destroyed by this, and yet the film is presented so well that it’s easy to get sucked into the drama. It is also helpful that the film uses a framing story — Mapes telling her potential defense attorney (Andrew McFarlane) the bulk of the film’s events — making it clear what we’re getting is her version of what happened. (The film is, after all, based on her book Truth and Duty: The Press, the President, and the Privilege of Power.) Keeping that in mind means that it is only natural that the story we get is going to lean in her favor.




It’s surprising how well the film plays as drama, but that isn’t really the point. The drama is simply what makes Truth entertaining. The point isn’t even that although the memos that led to all this may not have been authentic (that has never been conclusively established) and Mapes and her co-workers may have been bamboozled by the source, Lt. Colonel Bill Burkett (Stacy Keach) — the gist of what was in those memos was supported by others. All that is interesting. So is the fine detail on the pressures of deadlines, and the need for product. But none of this is what the film is after.




No, the film — sometimes too didactically — is ultimately about the erosion of journalistic integrity in an age where the news is at the mercy of a corporate mindset governed by profit. The irony here — assuming that Rather’s statement that 60 Minutes was the first news program in the history of TV news to make money is true — is that it’s a mindset created in part by the success of the very program that was taken down by it. While some of that may be viewed as opinion and while the film gets pretty obvious in its preaching, a look at TV news today only supports how far its journalistic worth has fallen. Rated R for language and a brief nude photo.


About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Truth

  1. Bob Voorhees

    My own guess, having followed these events closely at the time, is that “The Truth” is probably the truth. We watched this kind of Republican machiavellian maneuvering play out similarly in many of the things which followed the events of this excellent and compelling movie and then led to the bogus election of a man pathetically unfit and unworthy to be President of the United States — issues involving ballot box tricks and even the involvement of the Supremes. Many in the culture are now saying that the nation is being run by the rich, people like the Bushes and their cronies on Wall Street, in the banks, and the offices of corporate leaders. If this is so (and I do agree), then “The Truth” is partly about how they operate to get what they want and how their offspring are often the beneficiaries of their sense of special entitlements.

    • “My own guess…” Well, that’s what happens when you guess. Anyone can check out the wikipedia article on the Killian documents. They are forgeries, and everyone knows it, unless they don’t want to. The rest of the story was based on almost nothing and would never have seen the light of day without the forged documents.
      I also followed the story at the time, but since I don’t hate Republicans, I saw it as it was happening – on various amateur websites. The story was destroyed not by “Republican machiavellian maneuvering”, but by lots of amateurs working on their own time to uncover the Truth. The White House had nothing to do with it.
      Follow the real story: how a bunch of liberal journalists thought they could throw an election with a badly sourced story, and how the internet caught them to everyone’s great surprise. That would have been a great movie; it was a great story at the time. It’s too bad that so many people just follow their knee-jerk reactions to assume that the liberal villains were the victims.

      • Ken Hanke

        I just love when people “prove” their point by citing Wikipedia.

        • sally sefton

          This movie and particularly, it would seem, this review has hit a raw nerve, and this is an indication that the story is still intriguing so many years after the firing of Rather. The movie is one sided. But there is a great deal of evidence that Bush received preferential treatment. Some of the documents couldn’t be authenticated. But Bush’s service in the “Champagne Unit” is pretty much a given. What remains fascinating and infuriating is the hypocrisy of Heyward and his outrage over this story forgetting that he and his fellow news executives of CBS were more than willing to overlook the Bush administration’s lies about weapons of mass destruction. This was not just inadequately sourced intelligence but outright fabrications that sent hundreds of thousands to their death.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.