Under the Roofs of Paris (Sous les toits de Paris)

Movie Information

Classic Cinema From Around the World will present Under the Roofs of Paris at 8 p.m. Friday, Jan. 8, at Courtyard Gallery, 9 Walnut St., in downtown Asheville. Info: 273-3332.
Genre: Comedy/Drama With Music
Director: René Clair
Starring: Albert Préjean, Pola Illéry, Edmond R. Gréville, Bill Bocket, Gaston Modot
Rated: NR

René Clair’s Under the Roofs of Paris (1930) is usually cited as the first French talkie or as evidence of Clair’s immediate mastery of sound. But by rights it ought to be thought of as a kind of utterly charming trip through time to a pre-WWII Paris—a place you normally only see in still photographs (think Brassai). Assessing the film on its technical merits, frankly, does it a disservice, since it catches none of the feeling of the film—and its technical merits are, if not exaggerated, not quite the breakthroughs film-history books paint them as.

Actually, calling the film a talkie is a bit of a misnomer, since it’s really only a part talkie, though that doesn’t mean it’s anything like those Hollywood hybrids that were common in 1928 and 1929. There are no intertitles. It’s simply that Clair only uses dialogue when it’s necessary. A great deal of the time, the film is silent with a synchronized musical score. It doesn’t feel awkward or forced. It merely feels like the filmmaker isn’t interested in talk for its own sake. This is also why and how Under the Roofs of Paris stands out from so much of the Hollywood product surrounding it.

Nearly all of its most famous sequences were obviously shot silent and the sound added later. As a result, it has much more in common with the last—and most sophisticated—days of the silent film than with the early talkie. In fact, the sequence so often cited as evidence of Clair’s mastery of the new medium—a shot (actually, the approach is used twice) where his camera travels all the way from the roof of a multistory building to the ground floor, while we see what’s going on through the windows—is a variant on the amazing shot moving up the seven floors of the shaved set in Frank Borzage’s 7th Heaven (1927). It’s the exact same technique—a camera mounted on an elevator—only with sound added after the fact. That doesn’t keep it from being quite wonderful, but it does keep it from being groundbreaking.

But that’s OK. If Clair was influenced by Borzage, so what? The actual opening of the film (as it stands now, since Clair removed a scene from the beginning of the movie in 1950) was just as obviously a tremendous influence on Rouben Mamoulian’s opening sequence in Love Me Tonight (1932), which took it to new heights. It’s the nature of art—and it always has been.

And the film itself? It’s a slight, but wholly charming story involving a street singer, Albert (Albert Préjean), his friendship with a petty crook, Louis (Edmond T. Gréville), and their love for a Romanian girl, Pola (Pola Illéry), who is also connected to a more accomplished (but far from significant) criminal, Bill (Bill Bocket). What plot there is mostly concerns Albert being framed for a robbery—by Bill—just as he’s about to marry Pola, whereupon Louis thinks nothing of taking his place in her affections.

The story is largely inessential, however. What counts—apart from the glimpse into a long-vanished world and the remarkable technique of the film—is how surprisingly compelling the lives of these characters are. Clair always evidenced a shrewd eye for casting inherently likable and sympathetic performers for his films, but here he has outdone himself. Even with (or perhaps because of?) the limited dialogue, the relationships of the three leads feels very real, very believable. They aren’t the most admirable characters in the world, but you care about them. Both the friendship between Albert and Louis, and Albert’s love for both his friend and Pola come across as touchingly genuine. Even Pola—quite the most dubious of the three—manages to convey that she cares about both men and knows which one truly loves her.

Very often when you finally catch up with a legendary film, it’s something of a letdown—especially if it takes years and years for you to see it. That’s not the case here—that is once you get past the idea that Under the Roofs of Paris isn’t quite the technical wonder it’s long been considered (often in books from 40 or 50 years ago that were obviously written more from memory than from having the film at hand). Clair’s achievement is actually better than a technical marvel; it’s a human one.

About Ken Hanke
Head film critic for Mountain Xpress from December 2000 until his death in June 2016. Author of books "Ken Russell's Films," "Charlie Chan at the Movies," "A Critical Guide to Horror Film Series," "Tim Burton: An Unauthorized Biography of the Filmmaker."

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Under the Roofs of Paris (Sous les toits de Paris)

  1. Brian

    I saw this film in college. I was quite excited to see it. I found it unbearable. I remember initially being very impressed by some of the overhead shots of Paris. Then after that I was mind-numbingly bored. I would like to give it another chance, and this review might make me do just that. The print I saw it on was not too good. Maybe a proper DVD transfer would do the trick.

  2. Ken Hanke

    There are a few patches where the print is in bad shape, but they’re very few. Otherwise, it’s a surprisingly nice print that’s out on DVD (assuming that the Criterion disc is the only one there is). Whether this will make the difference for you is another question. It has for me on some films. On others, they just looked better.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.