Two days outside the box: thinking sustainably

It was an upside-down conference, where some 150 participants shook their ideas out onto the carpeted floor of the Asheville Civic Center Banquet Hall, then scooped them up in circles and reshaped them into projects to channel storm-water here, grow urban gardens there, and reduce energy demands everywhere.

Photo By Jonathan Welch

The occasion was a national convocation on Urban Environmental Design for Community Sustainability, held March 19 and 20. And the conference method was perhaps as big a star as the conference topic: Called “open space technology” (see “What If They Had a Conference and No Speakers Came,” March 5 Xpress), the method convenes people around a subject or a goal, but offers no speakers or established workshops. Instead, individuals post discussion topics in the “marketplace”—a wall of time slots—and attendees pick their subjects and schedules on the spot. They’re even free to move from circle to discussion circle around the room.

Thirty-four topics hit the marketplace, each given an hour for discussion during the five hours of multiple circles. Topics ranged from city/county mandates to revenue bonds for renewable-energy efficiency, from green infrastructure to edible urban fungi, from including young people in planning to something called “the resistance”—a discussion of why there wasn’t a more diverse attendance and how to encourage that in the future.

Viewed from afar, however, most topics clustered into two dominant themes: how to shape policies and initiatives that would reduce the community’s energy use and how to encourage self-sustaining practices in building, food production and land use.

Reconvening at 8:30 a.m. the next morning, the group self-defined various potential outcomes for the conference. Two of the most popular were developing a regional sustainability plan and creating a Community Sustainability Institute, but people signed up to stay in touch and work on other projects such as a sustainable-house tour, a comprehensive meeting of grass-roots sustainability groups, passage of a storm-water and sedimentation-and-erosion-control ordinance that “our children will be proud of,” a regional energy-conservation program, and food cultivation in urban Asheville.

In the end, back in a large, round-up circle, participants took turns offering comments on the event, with many expressing gratitude or excitement for the interaction. Local real-estate consultant David Holcomb captured the group’s attention with a nature analogy: “People are like water vapor or steam,” he offered, “and with help, you can transform steam into water, which provides power, or into ice, which provides structure. … These goals need to be turned from steam into substance.”

The conference was co-sponsored by the American Planning Association, American Institute of Architects, U.S. Partnership: Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, the HUB Alliance, the Asheville Area Chamber of Commerce, UNCA and the city of Asheville. John Stevens, a UNCA chemistry professor and one of the conference planners, said he was pleased with the outcome. “It provides an opportunity for moving forward in a number of ways for our regions,” Stevens told Xpress. But, he added, “the interesting part of this process will be what happens following this two-day convention.”


Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Two days outside the box: thinking sustainably

  1. I personally felt this conference was incredibly worthwhile to attend. Everyone came with innovative ideas, constructive mind sets, an open manner of conversation, and perhaps most importantly – a desire to be involved and create a vision for our urban and regional growth in our community.

    I had never attended an ‘open-space’ before, but it was much more efficient than conferences I have paid hundreds of dollars to attend. This was free and available to anyone in the community.
    Kudos to the organizers, and cheers to the attendants.

    Let’s hope we see some good momentum on the ideas that were discussed and presented to each other throughout our wide and diverse community.

  2. ONLY CONTRACEPTION can save the world. All other ideas are distracting us from municipal contraception funding. So I boycotted the conference because new ideas constitute further diversions.
    Also ban zoning because zoning pollutes.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.