Chickens in the lead, dogs close behind

It wasn’t supposed to be a meeting about chickens. No, it was supposed to be an opportunity to give input on what changes, if any, need to be made to Section 3 of Asheville’s city code. That ordinance covers things like the licensing, leashing and spaying of animals within the city limits. It also spells out the penalties for having a nuisance animal, and the fact that no more than six animals can live in one household.

Clucking mad: Chicken-raising activists showed up en masse to the animal-ordinance meeting — and wore this pin — to argue for the right to raise yard birds. Photo By Jonathan Welch

But it was the chicken crowd that really took the spotlight, turning out in droves and making up the majority of those who filled the Training Room over the Asheville Police Department on the evening of July 8. Sporting buttons and armed with petitions, they came to argue for less regulation of chicken-raising in the city.

Some wanted to make sure the session stayed focused on those concerns. “Would this meeting have even happened without the chicken issue coming forward?” asked one participant. (The answer, according to the city, is yes.)

Others lamented that early media reports about the upcoming meeting had leaned too hard on the chicken issue, perhaps keeping some residents with other pet concerns at home.

And indeed, Section 3 does address chickens along with other livestock—saying, among other things, that chickens cannot be kept within 100 feet of a neighboring property. Pro-chicken advocates—who champion their cause by touting the cheap eggs and meat these animals provide—want that boundary dropped to 25 feet.

License to leash: Animal services supervisor Brenda Sears (right) reads from Asheville’s animal ordinance while APD Capt. Daryl Fisher (left) and assistant city attorney Curt Euler (center) look on. Photo By Jonathan Welch

But judging by the input at the meeting, other factors in the chicken equation seem to differ from person to person. Some want chickens limited to 10 per household; others argued for stricter limits. Some want roosters, while others recognize that giving up that particular early-morning alarm system may be a necessary sacrifice to reach a compromise. And what about coops? Do chickens have to remain caged, or can they roam within a fenced yard?

Meanwhile, still others came to oppose an influx of chicken runs in the city, saying they have a right not to live next to a backyard farm.

But the meeting wasn’t all about fowl play: Ranking second on several of the breakout groups’ lists was the question of tethering dogs. Many called for an outright ban on the practice, and some wanted stronger enforcement of noise-ordinance violations involving barking dogs.

If anything, the evening demonstrated the varied attitudes and philosophies among pet owners, with heated debates sometimes erupting about what constitutes proper pet care.

“I know a lot of you are very passionate about some things,” APD Capt. Daryl Fisher said early in the meeting. If anything, that turned out to be an understatement.

Assistant City Attorney Curt Euler said answers may be awhile in coming. First, he and other city staff will have to compile the suggestions and concerns collected at the meeting and see which changes are even possible from an enforcement standpoint. A summary of the concerns brought up at the meeting will eventually be available on the city’s Web site, said Euler.

 

SHARE

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Chickens in the lead, dogs close behind

  1. Trey

    I can’t wait to move to downtown Asheville and start me a chicken farm.

    Yeeeeeeeeeee-Haaaaw!!!

  2. Allen

    I want chickens in my backyard. Why not limit it to hens only so there is no crowing problem. Have an ordinance that says if it smells bad then you will be ticketed. If there is no crowing and no smell whats the problem? Backyard chickens were part of the urban landscape for a thousand years. It’s only in the past 40 to 50 years that people stopped the practice.

  3. Trey

    Yeah…. I want miniature horses, miniature cows, miniature goats, could probably toss a couple of miniature pigs in there……..

  4. Ken Hanke

    Years and years ago, I was allowed to keep a pet goat within the city limits of Lake Wales, Florida. How? I pointed out that the mayor kept chickens. The city manager called me up and said, “You can keep the goat.”

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.