Which side are you on?: Partisan elections forum

This summer’s debate over Asheville City Council’s decision to change the city charter to allow partisan elections was a contentious one, with independents, Democrats and Republicans bickering over whether the switch would be beneficial or detrimental to local democracy.

The fallout resulted in a successful petition drive to put the matter to city voters. The referendum to determine whether Asheville will switch to partisan elections will be held Tuesday, Nov. 6—the date of Asheville’s next general election.

The petition to force a referendum on the matter succeeded by a narrow margin. On July 31, the Buncombe County Board of Elections announced that it had validated 5,022 petition signatures—just over the 5,000 required.

With the matter now set to be vote upon, the question still remains: Are partisan elections a good thing or bad thing?

A forum to be held Thursday, Oct. 11, will attempt to answer that question—or at least give people on both sides of the issue an opportunity to make their case.

The forum, presented by the Leadership Asheville Forum in conjunction with the N.C. Center for Creative Retirement, will take place from 7 to 9 p.m. at the center, which is located on the UNCA campus (get directions at www.unca.edu).

The event is free and open to the public, which will have the opportunity to pose questions to forum presenters.

Those scheduled to make presentations include Charlie Hume, leader of Let Asheville Vote, which spearheaded the petition drive. His presentation will focus on why the matter should be decided by voter referendum.

Hume will be joined by UNCA political science professor Bill Sabo, who will address the role of political parties. Also appearing will be Council members Jan Davis and Brownie Newman—two Democrats who fall on opposite sides of the partisan-election debate. Davis, who is opposed to partisan elections, will explain his position, while Newman—a proponent who spearheaded Council’s original vote to jettison nonpartisan elections, will attempt to explain his preference for partisan polling.

SHARE

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Which side are you on?: Partisan elections forum

  1. Rob Close

    Nuts & Bolts of the issue.

    There are about 28,000 democrats in asheville. 16,000 independents. 12,000 republicans (give or 1000 for each group).

    Partisan Elections, as proposed by our City Council, would have had democrats & republican primaries where they sorted house and got 3 candidates into the general guaranteed. All independent candidates would have been required 2,250 signatures to get into the general. To put that in perspective, last election, 6th place in the primary (thus good enough to get into general) got roughly 2,150 votes.

    Regardless, the math is simple. With roughly as many democrats united behind 3 candidates, with such a super-majority, they would be more or less guaranteed to win all 3 seats every single time. I challenge anyone to convince me that this was anything other than a power-grab, whether here or via debate at this forum.

    And if you agree, say so!

    Career-Politican-wanna-be’s have to learn that our democracy is SACRED.

  2. travelah

    I am in favor of the electorate throwing those lying sneaky elitist dogs out in the street on election day. Who would have imagined leftist Democrats elected to serve the public ending up like dirty Nixonian tricksters. My, how political ethics have turned a dark side in this lil’ mountain town.

  3. the

    Elaine Lite appears to be a great candidate for Brownie and Bryan to brainwash, since she seems to have very few ideas of her own except for a few.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.