City Council to hold bond work session, regular meeting Tuesday, June 28

City Council will kick off a busy Tuesday with a 10 a.m. work session to discuss the possible city bond referendum, which Council is studying for inclusion on the general election ballot in November. The meeting will take place in the fourth floor training room of the municipal building (the downtown fire and police headquarters building at 100 Court Plaza) and will offer a first look at the some of the specific projects being vetted for possible inclusion in the bond proposal.

At Council’s directions, city staff has assembled a list of potential projects in four categories:

  • Parks & Recreation: $17 million for projects including a new gym facility at the Wesley Grant Center, upgrades to Memorial/Mountainside Stadium, Jake Rusher Park, Montford Center improvements, Richmond Hill Park restrooms, outdoor courts and playgrounds, ball field lighting and land acquisition for parks.
  • Infrastructure: $30 million, with $16 million associated with road resurfacing projects. Other initiatives include sidewalk improvements and new sidewalks, transportation safety upgrades (such as crossing signals, crosswalks and bus shelters) and greenways.
  • Public safety: $13 million for deferred maintenance, updates and upgrades at existing city fire and police stations, including the downtown police and fire headquarters building at 100 Court Plaza.
  • Affordable housing: $30 million for programs including homeowner developer loan program, increased housing trust fund, community land trust formation and land banking or repurposing city-owned land ($15 million).

A memo attached to the notice of the meeting provides an interesting historical and comparative overview of property tax rates in the city. 1982 saw the city’s highest-ever property tax rate at $1.07 per $100,000 of assessed property value. The city’s current tax rate is 47.5 cents per $100,000.

Another analysis compares Asheville’s tax rate and per capita debt to other municipalities in North Carolina. For those cities that collect an additional sales tax to fund transit systems, the average property tax rate is 51.27 cents; for cities like Asheville that fund transit out of property taxes alone, the average rate is 54.87 cents. Average per capita debt in the state is $867, compared with Asheville’s per capita debt level of $234. “This is a very low ratio, less than 1/3 of the average statewide,” the memo states. The potential impact of different levels of bond funding on property tax amounts is also explored. Both the amount of money borrowed via bond funding and the upcoming tax revaluation have the potential to impact 2017 tax bills.

City Council regular meeting

At 5 p.m. on Tuesday, Council will convene its regular meeting in City Council chambers on the second floor of City Hall. A resolution in memory of local community activist and recent County Commission candidate Isaac Coleman will lead off the meeting.

Items in Council’s consent agenda include a resolution to rebid the contract for resurfacing playing fields at the John B. Lewis Soccer Complex on Azalea Road; an ordinance lowering the speed limit to 25 miles per hour on certain city streets; and authorization to participate in an effort to pursue regional gigabit broadband advancement in Western North Carolina in cooperation with other municipalities and Land of Sky Regional Council.

An annual report on the city’s stormwater management program will lay out priorities for capital improvement projects.

Council will hear reports and public comment on four rezoning requests. The first concerns a nonconforming lot on Lookout Drive. The owner, Eric Workman, requests the rezoning to support development of the lot for a single-family residence.

The second hearing will be a request for a conditional use permit for a six-story, 88-unit veteran
housing development on 4.54 acres at 1401 Tunnel Rd. City Council must grant conditional use zoning for multi-family housing projects containing more than 50 units. The developer, Asheville Buncombe County Christian Ministries, also owns and operates an existing veterans housing complex on an adjacent parcel at 1329 Tunnel Rd.

A request to amend a conditional use zoning at 311 and 315 Old Haw Creek Rd., owned by Bethesda United Methodist Church, proposes to remove a previously approved student housing component of a project to redevelop church-owned property. The requested amendment will divide portions of the church property for residential development.

The final public hearing will feature a controversial development proposal for 272 units of rental housing at 60 Mills Gap Rd., the former site of the Plasticorp manufacturing facility. Proposed by developer Rusty Pulliam, the project has been the focus of fierce community opposition from neighborhood groups along Sweeten Creek and Mills Gap roads. The neighbors argue that traffic congestion and delays along the two arteries already create long delays and possible public safety concerns. Of the 800 rental housing units within one mile of the project site permitted since 2013, almost 600 are not yet completed and occupied. The North Carolina Department of Transportation owns both roads, and widening plans are on the books for both. The projects will not be completed until 2020 and 2021.

City staff have objected to the project on the grounds that it will result in the loss of scarce industrial property, which city economic development plans seek to preserve. City staff also has argued that the location of the project is too far from transit and pedestrian amenities. The site lies a quarter of a mile from Hendersonville Road, which is served by the city’s S3 bus line. Crossing busy Sweeten Creek Road and traveling along a section of Mills Gap Road that lacks sidewalks makes pedestrian access difficult, staff have commented.

The project was reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission on November 19 last year; the developer asked that the Commission defer its vote to a later meeting. On January 6, the Commission again considered the project and, after hearing extensive public comment against the development, nonetheless voted 6-1 to approve it. Pulliam held two meetings with the community after the January 6 meeting and modified some aspects of the proposal. Instead of designating 20 percent of the units as affordable for a period of 10 years, he instead agreed to a term of 15 years of affordability for 15 percent of the units. He also agreed to extend the length of a turning lane at the intersection of Mills Gap and Sweeten Creek roads.

In a staff memo, the city planning department recommends against approval of the project in order to preserve viable industrial property. The staff memo also cites the department’s opinion that the location is unsuitable for dense multifamily development.

Council will consider a recommendation to reject all bids received in the city’s recent request for proposals for the management of the city transit authority. Citing irregularities in the bid process, Council will vote on extending the management contract of the current contractor, First Transit, on a month-to-month basis while another RFP is issued.

Boards and commissions

In its consent agenda, Council will vote to appoint Sir Charles Gardner to the Citizens Police Advisory Committee and to reappoint Alan Coxie as Chair to the Civil Service Board. Under new business, Council will consider two candidates for the Western North Carolina Air Quality Agency Board, Robert Lane and Joel Storrow. Finally, Council will consider appointments to the Accessory Dwelling Unit Task Force.

The full agenda and supporting documents can be found online here.

SHARE
About Virginia Daffron
Managing editor, lover of mountains, native of WNC. Follow me @virginiadaffron

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

5 thoughts on “City Council to hold bond work session, regular meeting Tuesday, June 28

  1. Lulz

    LOL, you can’t compare Asheville tax rates with others you clueless buffoons because we’re double taxed. And the county does zilch for the city.

    • bsummers

      What does “double taxed” mean? You mean the County? Is Asheville unique in that it’s in a County that also levies taxes? Give us buffoons a clue, oh wise one.

      • Lulz

        LOL, considering you don’t pay the outrageous taxes that go to nothing of value, i.e. the phony bond for infrastructure improvements now being peddled yet the money has been funneled to where over the years, do us all a favor and go away. If they have to pass bonds in order to get money while FOR DOING WHAT GOVERNMENT IS SUPPOSED TO DO while at the same time wasting it on things that have nothing to do with the actual role of government, then buddy the clueless like yourself that aren’t paying for it simply should learn to keep quiet. Because enough of fleecing everyone while the rich get richer and that rear ends massaged at the same time while everyone else gets the shaft. And loudmouths like you cheer it on.

        • bsummers

          OK, so – no answer to my very simple question, just insults. You have no facts to back up your vitriol. Got it.

  2. Lulz

    They need to refocus their spending on actual things that government is around for. Otherwise they need to go the way of the Dodo because they serve no use and sure as hell don’t do anything of value. Increasing taxes, increasing fees FOR YEARS and for what? It ain’t going to infrastructure and that’s what’s not being brought up here. It’s going to fluff, phony liberal causes, and their friends in the non-profits who couldn’t hold down a job at Burger King. Vote the bond down.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.