Asheville City Council

A plan to buy up guns from city residents sparked controversy at the Asheville City Council’s Nov. 13 meeting and ended with a Council member’s resignation from the committee he chairs. A discussion of tactics culminated in an exchange between Mayor Terry Bellamy and Council member Carl Mumpower, prompting Mumpower to resign from the Public Safety Committee.

Gunning for guns: In this photo, taken in August, Asheville police prepare guns for destruction. The city of Asheville is hoping a new buy-up program will net more weapons from the streets. Photo By Jonathan Welch

Council’s approval of the gun buy-up—a response to growing fears of local gang activity—clears the way for the next steps, including securing private matching funds. According to a report by police Chief William Hogan, the idea is to set up stations at the city’s community centers throughout December to buy up guns brought in by city residents. The going price: $50 for handguns and rifles, $100 for assault weapons. Similar programs have been undertaken in cities across the United States since the mid-1990s. The resulting intake of weapons is the topic of much debate, with supporters trumpeting them as a success and critics saying the results are misleading. The price range is typical for many of the programs.

“I’m a little concerned that there hasn’t been enough input from the African-American community,” said resident Jesse Junior. “Before it is approved, that kind of information should be disseminated. … They may have some input that may be helpful.”

But Alphonso McGlen, a pastor at St. James A.M.E. Church, urged Council to move forward. “I am standing in support of the initiative,” he declared. “If it means getting at least one gun off the street, I’m standing asking you to give great consideration to this initiative.”

Bellamy pointed out that the idea for the program, which is only part of a larger anti-gang initiative, originated in the African-American community. “There’s not one silver bullet—no pun intended—for this issue,” she noted, emphasizing that other programs in the works will provide jobs and activities for youth. “By no means is this the only item Council is approving.”

But it was a procedural issue that confounded Mumpower. City Council, he said, typically runs ideas by the appropriate committee—in this case, the Public Safety Committee, which he chairs—to get their recommendations.  Bellamy explained that the timeliness and urgency of the issue led her to bring it straight to Council.

But if Council was willing to skip that step, responded Mumpower, then maybe the committee should simply be dissolved.

That was OK with Bellamy. “I am definitely going to recommend it be disbanded,” she said, adding that the 7 a.m. meeting time makes the group “noninclusive,” and that she wasn’t happy about how the committee’s agendas are set. Mumpower then tendered his resignation from the committee—which the mayor promptly accepted.

The gun buy-up passed on a 5-1 vote, with Mumpower opposed (Council member Robin Cape is on a council-related trip).

Later that evening, Mumpower circulated an e-mail announcing his resignation from both the Public Safety Committee and the Revenue and Finance Committee.

“In view of the selective application of our policies and procedures by the Council majority,” the e-mail states, “I no longer see constructive purpose in participating in the Council committee structure. Effective immediately, I respectfully tender my resignation as chair of the Public Safety Committee and [member of] the Finance Committee.”

Money talks

Boxy, but good

by Hal L. Millard

Dig it: A City Council grant will assist an expansion at Volvo to build a new line of excavators.

When is government assistance to business simply corporate welfare, and when is it just smart public policy? To a majority of City Council and city Economic Development Director Sam Powers, it’s smart when you can guarantee a return on your investment, as is the case with a $599,200 grant to Volvo Construction Equipment, Powers tells Xpress (see main story).

In return for the money, which will be parceled out over seven years, the city has the assurance that Volvo will invest at least $20 million in a major plant expansion to build a new line of excavators. That expansion, announced in 2006, will create as many as 300 jobs. The first excavator rolled off the line on Nov. 9.

Council, which approved the grant at its Nov. 13 meeting in a 5-1 vote, is not alone in its largesse. The Volvo expansion is being made possible in part by grants and incentives from the state’s Job Development Investment Grant, the N.C. Department of Commerce, the N.C. Community College System, the N.C. Department of Transportation, Buncombe County, the Economic Development Coalition of Asheville-Buncombe, and AdvantageWest. The money offered by the city to Volvo represents 75 percent of the additional city-property taxes the capital improvements are estimated to create—$85,600 annually, says Powers, who adds that the grant is far from free money.

“This is a performance-based grant,” says Powers. “That means they have to do everything that they say they are going to do.” In addition to pledging the capital investment and new jobs, the grant also ensures that the Volvo project will not leave the area, which had been a possibility. Volvo, with global production facilities, “was looking to do this [project] all over the world,” says Powers. “Had it gone somewhere else, we also would have potentially lost several hundred jobs” that currently exist at the plant. The grant basically ensures that Volvo, one of the area’s biggest employers, will remain in Asheville for years to come, he says.

Council member Carl Mumpower, who voted against the grant, still isn’t impressed. “Volvo is a good thing—corporate welfare, in my opinion, is not,” he tells Xpress. “Federal, state, and local government is increasingly working as a rigged lottery where some get handouts and some do not. We serve business and our future better by holding the line on taxes, maintaining healthy, safe communities and providing a strong pool of educated and motivated employees. Corporate welfare causes the same harms to business that it tends to cause for professional welfare mothers—it stimulates dependency and inadequacies as it subtracts dignity and accountability.”


Council members juggled quite a few dollars during their shorter-than-average meeting. The biggest blow was a move to funnel millions into long-neglected water-system repairs. On a 5-1 vote, Council approved a $40 million bond issue for upgrading the water system, the biggest repair investment in years. “We are known across the state to have an old system,” said Bellamy. “By making this investment, we will have one of the newest systems.”

Water revenues will pay off the bonds, according to a staff report. Mumpower said he voted “no” because Asheville is still in litigation over the General Assembly’s passage of Sullivan Acts II and III, which restrict the city’s ability to charge for water services.

Council members also approved a $599,200 economic-development incentive for Volvo Construction Equipment in connection with an expansion at its Skyland plant. The agreement, said Assistant City Manager Jeff Richardson, will secure a $20 million capital investment by the company. The expansion, said Vice President of Volvo Construction Equipment Dave Million, will create 250 to 300 new jobs over the next three years. The grant will be paid out in seven annual installments.

“This is our way of saying thank you for choosing Asheville when you could have gone anywhere in the world,” said Bellamy.

But Mumpower objected to what he called “corporate welfare.” Council member Brownie Newman observed that, while he’s inclined to agree with Mumpower, if Asheville stops awarding such grants, it will fall behind in the hunt to recruit businesses.

“If our community single-handedly stops giving incentives and nobody else does, we are going to lose jobs in our community,” predicted Newman.

Both the grant and an $85,600 budget amendment to cover the first payment passed in 5-1 votes, with Mumpower once again opposed.

Council members also approved a $1.2 million capital-improvements plan involving several parks-and-recreation projects, including repairs to the Reid Center, Memorial Stadium and Aston Park, as well as city swimming pools and the Municipal Golf Course’s irrigation system.


Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Asheville City Council

  1. Becky Tate

    Typical Mumpower, bless his heart. His ego has a tendency to trip him up, even in his trendy running shoes and cute shorts. Or maybe it’s part of his congressional campaign. Either way, anybody against a gun buyback will be sent to a special interviewing room in heaven, where St. Peter will ask them, and so just WHY did you think it was a bad idea to get some guns off the street? An explanation having to do with being disgruntled over a committee or any other petty reason (including political partisanship), is likely to fall a little flat. Good luck with that one Carl!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.