Not so instant

The voters may have spoken, but the State Board of Elections is still trying to figure out what they said. Although North Carolina's first stab at statewide instant-runoff voting should avoid the trouble and expense of a conventional runoff election, the winner in the 13-candidate N.C. Court of Appeals race won’t be decided until sometime after Nov. 29.

Instant runoff asks voters to indicate their first, second and third choices in specific judicial races on Election Day. The first-place votes are then tallied, with the second and third choices held in reserve in case no candidate achieves more than 50 percent of the total.

In this case, Cressie Thigpen (20.32 percent of the unofficial first-place vote) and Doug McCullough (15.20 percent) led the field. At this writing, the Board of Elections was expected to officially certify the election tallies on Nov. 23. The next step, slated for Nov. 29, is examining the second- and third-place votes for those two candidates to determine who ultimately proved more popular with the state's voters.

Each candidate’s second-place votes will be added to their first-place total. They’ll also get their third-place votes, provided their rival isn’t named second on the same ballot, explains Don Wright, chief counsel for the State Board.

The state Legislature had previously approved trying instant-runoff voting in a limited number of communities (including Hendersonville). But in August, N.C. Court of Appeals Judge James A. Wynn Jr. was appointed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, leaving insufficient time to hold a special primary for his seat. In keeping with a recently approved law, North Carolina became the first state in the nation to apply the method statewide.

Instant-runoff voting was also used in Superior Court races in Buncombe, Cumberland and Rowan counties. In Buncombe County, Judge Marvin Pope (formerly on the District Court bench) was a clear winner in the first round, collecting 53.11 percent of the unofficial vote. Heather Whitaker Goldstein received 32.94 percent, and Diane K. McDonald took 13.94 percent.

Over the past 20 years, the turnout for runoff elections in North Carolina has ranged from 2.5 to 8 percent, according to an article in the Carolina Journal. That number contrasts sharply with the 44 percent who cast ballots on Nov. 2. The Journal (the monthly newspaper of the nonprofit John Locke Foundation) also quoted Gary Bartlett, executive director of the State Board of Elections, who estimated that the new method would cost "25 percent of what it would cost to hold a runoff election."

Instant-runoff voting does have its detractors, however, including Zagros Madjd-Sadjadi, an associate professor of economics at Winston-Salem State who co-authored a paper questioning the method’s constitutionality.

"IRV is the formula that keeps on taking," Madjd-Sadjadi told Xpress by phone. He believes the process hurts voters in several ways, but particularly by eliminating "true choice." If none of his three candidates makes it to the second round, for example, "All of a sudden, I'm disenfranchised," he said.

And the cost-saving argument is moot, Madjd-Sadjadi points out, because the state's judicial elections were previously won by the highest vote-getter, regardless of whether anyone polled more than 50 percent.

— Freelance reporter Nelda Holder can be reached at


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.