City, county call for public access proposals

Tonight, Asheville City Council will consider issuing a call for proposals, partnering with Buncombe County, for an outside group to provide “community media development” following the collapse of the WNC Community Media Center. However, the proposal does not specify that a public access television channel to replace the defunct URTV must be part of the deal, and the funding the governments provide would provide expires after three years.

The request for proposals emphasizes that the new group must have a vision for “building a media network and resources that are progressive and green, and one that places the power of new media in the hands of local citizens,” helping with workforce development, furthering the media arts industry and providing media education. This follows the city’s refusal to renew the media center’s contract to operate URTV, following the non-profit’s collapse amid a funding dispute with the county.

In return, the city and county will provide $30,000 each during the first year, $20,000 during the second and $10,000. After that, local government funding ends and the community media organization will have to be self-sustaining.

Notably, the RFP has no requirement for the group to operate a public access television channel, though the city’s Administrative Services Director Lauren Bradley, who’s overseeing the proposal, says that a channel might be part of a successful proposal.

“They [the city and county] feel that whole field has evolved so much since we got in the public access business that they wanted to expand the scope so there could be an opening for new models, creative models that could be considered for investment for this money,” Bradley said. “It’s not just limited to the provision of public access.”

What about the PEG funds — a fee collected from cable subscribers for government, education and public access channels — the city will continue to receive? A new public access channel could have access to those, Bradley says, but otherwise they’ll go to the city’s government channel, freeing up general fund dollars currently budgeted for that purpose.

The proposal doesn’t include URTV’s equipment, which the city has taken, because a full inventory remains unfinished.

“We’ve been working with the landlord, but right now we just don’t have a good inventory that we can put out there in a proposal,” Bradley says. “If the proposal accepted includes a public access channel or some other proposal that could make use of this equipment, we would negotiate to see how it could be best invested in the process.”

If Council signs off on it, the city will officially issue the RFP on July 1, with responses due by August 1.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

6 thoughts on “City, county call for public access proposals

  1. Lasereye

    HEADLINE: Local government destroys public access TV – then reappears to save it with a disingenuous RFP which guarantees failure after stripping away the public’s cable channel. Let’s hear it for the 1st amendment – freedom of expression in our community!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.