Density, money, state politics on Council’s radar for this year

At their retreat yesterday, March 11, Asheville City Council members discussed a variety of topics facing the city, focusing especially on density, persistent budget issues, the effect of state legislation, and even a possible overhaul in the way city government deals with the arts.

Council’s holding its annual strategic retreat a little late this year, but par for the course, there was a great deal of discussion over how best to have the discussion -— such on format, specificity of topic and the like. Nonetheless, a number of staff presentations shed new light on the city’s situation and possible courses Council might take.

“Our iceberg is melting”
Back in 2010, city staff put together a financial crossroads report that summed up the issues facing Asheville during the economic downturn, and some that had started well before. This morning, staff released an updated report. It used the analogy of a melting iceberg, with the city as a group of penguins searching for a new home.

At the heart of all that metaphorical peril: Modest revenue growth (about one to two percent) is not keeping pace with 4 to 5 percent annual growth in expenses, including in costs, such as fuel and utilities, that the city has relatively little control over. In recent years staff have sought to close the gap by freezing positions, paring down departments, and trying to find other efficiencies. But, Financial and Management Services Director Lauren Bradley said, that approach is nearing the end of its usefulness: The city is at the point where it will start losing services with further cuts.

“We can’t continue to be everything to everyone,” Bradley said. She added that overhauls in how the city handles festivals (Bele Chere costs about $450,000 a year, something staff and Council both noted several times) and infrastructure might be necessary. Staff also discussed changing the way the city deals with cultural arts, a topic of some discussion lately, into a “pool of money” that the city could use to foster partnerships.

Council member Cecil Bothwell also said that raising the property tax deserves serious consideration, though other Council members made avoiding a hike a high priority. In previous years, Bothwell’s suggestion hasn’t received much traction.

The city’s financial situation is a major issue this year, with work sessions March 12 and 26, along with a special budget retreat April 4. 

Go dense
Related to the financial issue, city staff and Council considered pursuing density more aggressively. That’s one way to grow the city’s tax base without expanding its boundary. Council member Gordon Smith asserted that it might be necessary to examine allowing denser development in more single-family neighborhoods without projects needing to go to Council, while also trying to improve amenities and infrastructure to blunt the impact.

“Let’s not pretend there’s a debate about whether density is going to happen,” Smith said. Instead he believes Council should focus on the best way for it to take place.

Council member Chris Pelly, a former neighborhood activist, also emphasized improving the ability of neighborhoods to deal with increased traffic and population. Council member Jan Davis, on the other hand, said that if density becomes too neighborhood-friendly, it’s hard for business corridors like Merrimon Avenue to function.

Smith added, “We’ve been in an affordable housing crisis for 10 years.” He suggested that ambitious solutions are necessary, otherwise Asheville, without a growing middle class, risks losing its vibrancy.

During her presentation, Bradley noted the major increase in tax revenue places like the River Arts District could produce if more abandoned properties were redeveloped.

Dancing with Raleigh
City manager Gary Jackson warned that in their pursuit of potential reforms, legislators have made it clear they won’t leave city revenues untouched.

Nonetheless, multiple members of Council said that Rep. Nathan Ramsey has mentioned his desire to ensure that city revenues don’t take a hit from new legislation (Ramsey made similar claims talking with Xpress last week about legislation on the city’s use of its water revenues). Council also decided that conversations between the city and county to work out local agreements before Raleigh proposes more local bills might be a good course of action.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.