*UPDATE* With recount complete, Davis edges out Gray by 35 votes in City Council race

Pictured: Jan Davis

UPDATE: A recount of the votes completed and certified by the Buncombe County Board of Elections this afternoon, Nov. 18, didn’t significantly change the results of the election. Incumbent Jan Davis retained his third place finish – and his seat on Asheville City Council – by a total of 35 votes over challenger Lael Gray. The final tally:

Jan Davis: 7,701
Lael Gray: 7,666

The Nov. 15 post:

After sifting through more than 200 provisional ballots, the Buncombe County Board of Elections certified the official results of the Asheville City Council election today: Incumbent Jan Davis retained his third place finish ahead of challenger Lael Gray by a razor-thin margin of 34 votes.

The unofficial tally released the night of Nov. 8 had showed Davis with a 40-vote edge. Some observers had speculated that after the provisional ballots were counted, Gray could overtake that deficit.

Immediately following the announcement of the official results, Gray requested a recount, which the board said they would try to complete by the end of the week.

“It stinks having to wait some more,” said Gray before speculating that it might be the closest election in the history of Asheville City Council. “This is really wild. It’s a little surreal.”

The official results also confirmed Marc Hunt as the top vote getter and that Chris Pelly came in second, with both winning seats on Council. The board also confirmed the success of the sales-tax referendum by a margin of 503 votes.

The official Asheville City Council results:

Marc Hunt: 8,760
Chris Pelly: 8,202
Jan Davis: 7,703
Lael Gray: 7,669
Mark Cates: 5,263
Saul Chase: 1,762

The official sales-tax referendum results:

For: 16,874
Against: 16,371


Pictured: Lael Gray

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Jake Frankel
Jake Frankel is an award-winning journalist who enjoys covering a wide range of topics, from politics and government to business, education and entertainment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “*UPDATE* With recount complete, Davis edges out Gray by 35 votes in City Council race

  1. Barry Summers

    Gotta ask – would this be the same result if we had learned about the US Cellular deal three days earlier?

  2. Viking

    .01 precent ‘non-win’ win for Jan. Lael’s mailers set in ‘limbo’. Crazy.

    The worst part about the reporting on the Gray-Davis contest is this omitted piece of information:

    “The size of the sample of each category shall be chosen to produce a statistically significant result and shall be chosen after consultation with a statistician.”

    Ref: http://law.onecle.com/north-carolina/163-elections-and-election-laws/163-182.2.html

    Who was the statistics consultant? Where is his or her report so people can understand how Jan’s statistically insignificant ‘non-win’ win was conceptualized?

    It matters who gets into office. but it seems like as fewer voters turn out we should get the picture as to how any candidate is ‘selected’ based on statistical analysis when there is no popular mandate. Autopaleoconservatives should be interested in these questions as well.

    Bottom line: .01 percent can’t be a popular mandate… is it? It’s a statistical SWAG. The idea of Jan being a legitimate member of council is a SWAG. Thus, Jan is a SWAG.

    Good point about the US Cellular deal. It’s also amazing to hear Terry talking about congress with the all the COA (explicative deleted) performance problems in the past couple of years.

  3. Viking

    Surely a runoff election was the appropriate next step. The problem with that is Jan would probably win… and at the same time he really doesn’t deserve that upper hand in terms of a one-on-one race with a newcomer like Lael. Jan is literally a ‘total loser’.

Leave a Reply to Barry Summers ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.