More twists for gay marriage ban legislation

The proposed marriage amendment to the N.C. Constitution took on yet another persona today when the Senate passed SB 514, formerly known as the Nutrient Management Plan. The original legislation announced for discussion in the Senate Judiciary I Committee was HB 61, a term limits bill for the legislative leadership, with the marriage amendment language inserted there. But the bill morphed again before the 75-42 vote in the House this afternoon, and is now on the Senate calendar for tomorrow, Sept. 13, as SB 514. The legislative session is expected to end on Wednesday.

“It is an unsubtle effort on the part the GOP to get out the vote in the next election, but the sad truth is that it unleashes another cultural war in the state that is bad for business and disruptive to our communities,” said Democratic Rep. Ray Rapp of Mars Hill in response to an Xpress inquiry about the changing amendment identify. (Republican Rep. Tim Moffitt did not respond to the inquiry.) “This is a sad state of affairs when we have flood victims in Eastern North Carolina, high unemployment and our education system sinking under the weight of budget slashes . . .  and the issue that we are called to Raleigh to debate is the ban on gay marriage,” Rapp said.

Western North Carolina delegation members of the House split along party lines on the amendment vote, with Republicans Phillip Frye, David Guice, Tim Moffitt and Roger West in favor of today’s version of SB 514, and Democratics Susan Fisher, Phillip Haire, Patsy Keever, Ray Rapp voting against the bill. Republican Chuck McGrady did not vote on the bill.

In other activity, tomorrow’s House calendar includes a second reading of HB 823, formerly a bill addressing the governance of the Department of Public Instruction — now containing substitute language to create a constitutional amendment to limit the terms of the House and Senate leadership. Reconsideration of gubernatorial vetoes of HB 351 (Restore Confidence in Government — the voter photo ID bill), HB 482 (Water Supply Lines/Water Violation Waivers), SB 709 (Energy Jobs Act), and SB 727 (No Dues Checkoff for School Employees) are also listed on the calendar.

by Nelda Holder, contributing editor


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “More twists for gay marriage ban legislation

  1. vaccinium

    Yeah, that’s the burning issue? Just goes to show how in touch our litigators are with the voters.

  2. vaccinium

    I mean, I have been laid off nearly two years. Good jobs in WNC are virtually non-existant. I don’t really care whether we eat are not. I am just really concerned with the gay and lesbian issues. Thank you, my legislators for being in touch and really trying to get to the heart of the matter.

  3. wayne

    If NC truly wants to support “traditional marriage” it will pass an amendment outlawing divorce. Divorce is clearly, EXPLICITELY forbidden by the bible. Why aren’t they? Because they’re “selective christians” (lower case intended) who do not “like” that part of the bible! Kudo’s to Massachssets, whose intelligent people not only honor the civl rights of same sex couples by allowing them to marry since 2004, but have the lowest divorce rate in the US…..less than one-half that of NC. Massachussets lacks only NC’s shining history and tradition of discrimination and bigotry, about to raise their ugly heads once again! Although over 7 years have elapsed since Mass passed same sex marriage (and over 21 years in Holland) there is not a wisp of polygamy, bestiality, pedophilia, or mal-adjusted children, so forcefully predicted by your preachers. Finally, after you folks pass the amendment, make sure your make a corresponding change in the Pledge of Allegiance…..”with Liberty and Justice for SOME”.

  4. vaccinium

    You can have all the justice you can afford in this state. GAY PEOPLE, just take a pile of money down there and wave it in front of them. They will pass what ever you want.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.