Draft county budget pushes fund balance limit

Asheville Middle School
BACK TO SCHOOLS: Buncombe County's proposed fiscal year 2020 budget includes about $3.56 million in new education spending for A-B Tech, city and county schools, part of $19.89 million in expenses that exceed projected revenues. Photo by Virginia Daffron

How low can you go? That’s the question Buncombe County Manager Avril Pinder posed to the Board of Commissioners at its April 30 budget work session regarding the county’s projected fund balance — the difference between its assets and liabilities — for the next fiscal year.

The board’s current policy, Pinder pointed out, requires the county to keep a fund balance of at least 15%, or $47.35 million. However, the projected fiscal 2020 budget would put the balance at 14.76%, and if a $5.25 million sale of county property on Ferry Road is delayed or falls through, the balance could drop to as little as 13.09%.

As presented by Jennifer Barnette, the county’s budget director, Buncombe would need to dip into its reserves because projected expenditures for fiscal 2020 exceed projected revenues by $19.89 million. Major new spending items in next year’s budget include about $3.56 million more for A-B Tech, city and county schools; $2.65 million for early childhood education; $2.44 million for early retirement incentives; and $2.33 million for affordable housing.

Commission members were generally comfortable with taking a more aggressive tack to the fund balance, noting that the county had reduced the gap between revenue and expenses by nearly $6.3 million over the course of the current fiscal year, which ends June 30. Barnette confirmed that Buncombe now only expects to spend approximately $212,000 in fund balance for fiscal 2019.

Commissioner Joe Belcher gave his approval while expressing trust in county staff to manage the budget wisely. “The fund balance is a tool,” he said. “We get what y’all do: Y’all work within that to make sure that the needs are met and the taxpayers are protected.”

Chair Brownie Newman, however, seemed more hesitant to sign off on a budget that projected a use of fund balance in violation of county policy, at least on paper. “I definitely don’t want it to actually go below 15%,” he emphasized. “I would only be open to considering that [budget] if there’s a very clear understanding that active management of the budget will result in staying above 15%.”     

The commission did not take a formal vote on the fund balance issue, but its guidance led Pinder to say she would bring a recommended budget including a lower-than-15% projection to the board’s Tuesday, May 21, budget session. Members of the public will be able to comment on the budget during the board’s 5 p.m. meeting on Tuesday, June 4, in Room 326 at 200 College St. in downtown Asheville.

At the end of her presentation, Barnette noted that the spending from fund balance still wouldn’t fully fund departmental requests for personnel, salary and operating expenses. The budget omits 44 requested new staff positions, including six administrative assistants at the Board of Elections, 11 library assistants and two sheriff dispatchers.

Finally, Barnette added, pulling money from the fund balance isn’t a long-term solution to Buncombe’s needs. Planning for the next fiscal year, she said, “has not identified a sustainable revenue source to balance the budget.”

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Daniel Walton
Daniel Walton is the former news editor of Mountain Xpress. His work has also appeared in Sierra, The Guardian, and Civil Eats, among other national and regional publications. Follow me @DanielWWalton

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Draft county budget pushes fund balance limit

  1. DreadT

    “Commissioner Joe Belcher gave his approval while expressing trust in county staff to manage the budget wisely.”

    Yeah, because that has worked out so well in the past right? Remember the budget you passed that gave huge raises to a few select county employees? You either didn’t bother to look at the line items in the budget you passed, or require the raises to be specifically designated. Instead you “trust in county staff to manage the budget wisely”.

Leave a Reply to K Smith ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.