Affordable housing slashed in Eagle Market Place; construction to resume in September

County Commissioners hear a presentation about rent restructuring at Eagle Market Place. Commissioners approved changing 30 affordable housing units into workforce housing during their meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 2. Photo by Dan Hesse

During its meeting on Tuesday, Aug. 2, the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners approved a rent restructuring for the Eagle Market Place development. The move will cut the amount of affordable housing units in the development by nearly half, and will supplant those units with workforce housing. Commissioners also approved a rezoning request and made a number of board appointments.

Eagle Market Place shuffle

Wyatt Stevens, a lawyer representing the EMP development, laid out the case for why 30 of the project’s 62 housing units should transition from affordable to workforce rates. Stevens said affordable housing units are for people making 60 percent or less of area median income; those units would cost about $251 to $766 a month. Workforce housing is geared to those making 100 to 120 percent of area median income, and would cost from $1,120 to $1,400 per month.

Asheville City Council approved similar modifications to the project plans on Nov. 10 last year; the project team needed the County’s agreement to ensure that County funding would remain in place despite the changes in the mix of affordable versus workforce housing.

“What we are envisioning is a mixed-income development that a lot of folks believe is really a better model for projects like this,” said Stevens. Potential residents will have to supply tax returns, go through background checks and meet other qualifications. A property management company will administer the rental process.

EMP is a joint venture between the nonprofit Mountain Housing Opportunities and Eagle Market Streets Development Corporation. It’s a mixed-used development aimed at revitalizing downtown Asheville’s historically African-American neighborhood, known as The Block. The project received funding in 2012, but it has been in limbo since a crack developed in the concrete slab of the structure’s second floor in October 2014. Work resumed the following year to remove the faulty slab, but construction has not restarted in earnest.

Buncombe County originally committed a loan of $300,000, with the promise of an additional $2 million loan after the building receives its certificate of occupancy. However, the delays and increased costs have caused the development to seek additional, private funding. Stevens said the rent restructuring will allow EMP to pay back the additional loans incurred.

Stevens said it cost $600,000 to rip out the faulty concrete, but the project has recouped about $2 million in insurance money from the engineering and architecture firms involved; the project also has a $300,000 credit with the general contractor.

“We can solve this problem. We have good people that have crunched the numbers. We have lenders in place to do this deal. No lender is going to pay $3 million if they don’t think we can pay back. We just need restructured rent to fund that loan,” pleaded Stevens.

The overall cost of EMP is approaching $14 million for the residential component, but representatives say they are calculating it at about $12.3 million due to money recouped from insurance payouts.

“We are as frustrated as you and the community are about how long it has taken to unravel this mess. I can’t tell you how complicated the litigation was,” explained Stevens.

County Commissioners raised concerns about the rent restructuring while also affirming their commitment to the project. Commissioner Ellen Frost said she hopes all of the units eventually will return to affordable housing status.

“When we get project done, if we can convert workforce housing back to affordable, we will do it. That’s the mission of this organization [Mountain Housing Opportunities]. I believe workforce housing is a huge need too,” noted Stevens.

Commissioner Tim Moffitt asked whether, with the rent restructuring, Stevens is confident the debt service will be satisfied. Stevens replied that he is “100 percent confident.”

“This is a neighborhood that has been chronically undeserved and overlooked with all the progress that’s gone on around it. It’s a community that deserves and wants [EMP]. Rates are still below market value, even on the high end. We have a moral obligation to make sure that everybody that works and chooses to live here can afford it,” said Chairman David Gantt.

Commissioners unanimously approved the rent restructuring, but also insisted that Buncombe County Planning Director Jon Creighton and General Services Director Greg Isreal be involved with construction planning, progress and oversight.

Stevens said the project will break ground for the second time as early as September. He said the project team is optimistic the residential portion will be complete by December 2017.

Public hearing

The public weighed in about a proposed rezoning of 7.5 acres at the intersection of Kennedy and Clarks Chapel roads in Weaverville, from R-3 to CS (commercial service district). County staff noted that the two parcels of land are currently vacant and, as a result of the rezoning, would be home to a pottery studio and equipment storage for a landscaping company.

Six people spoke against the rezoning, citing increased traffic and the potential for larger commercial entities to occupy the property in the future. Chapel Road resident Peggy Olson urged the board, “Please say no to this. It doesn’t seem right we should have random commercial things…No one wants commercial in their residence.”

“I don’t have trouble with the pottery and landscape businesses, but I worry about the future and what it’s going to do to that neighborhood,” said resident Tim Holcombe.

Randy Yantz, one of those requesting the rezoning, said the retail space would only be 160 square feet and the rest of the space would be used for manufacturing pottery. “We may have the occasional customer, but our primary focus is products that get shipped,” said Yantz, noting that the business would create “very little retail traffic.”

County staff also noted the land is on septic, and commercial operations like hotels and larger retail operations would likely not be able to get septic permits.

Ultimately, commissioners approved the measure with Gantt casting the lone vote against it.

Board appointments

Commissioners made the following board appointments:

  • Agriculture Advisory Board
    Alan Lang – Unanimous
  • Health and Human Services
    Jim Pitts – Unanimous
  • Airport Authority
    David Gantt – Unanimous
  • Tourism Development
    Leah Ashburn – Unanimous
  • School Capital Fund
    Brownie Newman – 4-3 (Mike Fryar, Joe Belcher and Moffitt opposed)
    Ellen Frost – 4-3 (Fryar, Belcher and Moffitt opposed)
  • Adult Care Home Community Advisory Committee
    Toya Hauf – Unanimous
  • Nursing Home Community Advisory Committee
    Karen Campbell – Unanimous

The Buncombe County Board of Commissioners next meets on Tuesday, Aug. 16.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Dan Hesse
I grew up outside of Atlanta and moved to WNC in 2001 to attend Montreat College. After college, I worked at NewsRadio 570 WWNC as an anchor/reporter and covered Asheville City Council and the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners starting in 2004. During that time I also completed WCU's Master of Public Administration program. You can reach me at

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Affordable housing slashed in Eagle Market Place; construction to resume in September

  1. Lulz

    LOL, affordable housing is being slashed by your bad policies and increasing taxes and fees lulz. Why are residents paying for the RAD, brewers, art, downtown, and all the other garbage? Again, who in their right mind can come up with any reason as to why those that live here should subsidize private businesses and government intrusion into the market?

  2. MMH

    Eagle St is no longer an ‘african american neighborhood’ at all…it’s TIME for the RENTS to skyrocket there like any other NON subsidized housing!

  3. hauntedheadnc

    Now lulz, now lol, Lulzypoo hahahaha… “Government hee hee intrusion *giggle* into haha the *chuckle* market woohoo” is hee hee also rofl what lol gets lulz water *snort* lines hahahahahahaha and hee hee hee roads lulz spread lol through *giggle* the haha sprawl lol out roflmao where hahahahahahahahahaha the *chuckle* decent ha, God-fearing haha, real hahaha Americans hahahaha live roflcopter, so hahaha don’t lol be lulz such *snort* a *guffaw* selectively hee hee outraged lol hypocrite lulz. Although rofl, I haha am *giggle* curious *snerk* to hahaha hear roflmao your heeheeheehee justification lol for lulz why ha it haha would hahaha be hahahaha better *chuckle* to *snort* let hee hee part *giggle* of lol the lulz city haw haw rot *guffaw* rather rofl than roflmao invest lol in lulz it hee hee and lol bring lulz its *chuckle* properties tee hee back *titter* on lol the lulz tax rolf rolls hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

    Translation: Now, now, Lulzypoo… “Government intrusion into the market” is also what gets water lines and roads spread through the sprawl out where the decent, God-fearing, real Americans live, so don’t be such a selectively outraged hypocrite. Although, I am curious to hear your justification for why it would be better to let part of the city rot rather than invest in it and bring its properties back on the tax rolls.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.