The Green Scene

Growing numbers of developers are seeking to build impoundments that would convert streams into lakes, creating artificial waterfront property that could command higher prices.

Sign of the times: A billboard for Versant, a luxury community just north of Woodfin that’s promoted as a “green” development. Plans include construction of three dams that would impact a stream. photo by Jonathan Welch

The idea isn’t new—think Lake Lure and Beaver Lake. But if the eight proposed lakes now under consideration are approved, they will collectively impact some 30 miles of streams in Western North Carolina, according to biologist Bryan Tompkins, who works in the Asheville office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. “These impoundments are a little-noticed facet of the region’s increasing development, but they have serious and near-permanent impacts on the streams where they’re built,” he notes. Although lakes provide opportunities for boating or swimming, they don’t occur naturally in the Southern Appalachian landscape, says Tompkins.

In the first four months of this year alone, the Fish and Wildlife Service reviewed five applications for permits to build lakes in planned subdivisions, Tompkins reports. During all of 2006, the agency reviewed seven such applications. And while FWS makes formal recommendations to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers concerning the permits, the decision ultimately lies with the Corps and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources’ Division of Water Quality.

Last year, FWS reviewed a proposal to construct a 160-acre lake in Caldwell County that would serve as a landing area for seaplanes as part of a 3,100-acre residential development. Although the agency recommended that the permit be denied, the final decision is still pending. Meanwhile, the Corps of Engineers vetoed a proposed 15-acre lake in a 424-acre subdivision abutting national-forest land in Transylvania County, saying it would snuff out one of the few remaining thriving populations of Southern Appalachian brook trout. Native to the Southern Appalachians, the fish population has significantly declined throughout the region due to habitat loss.

The only river-impoundment project currently proposed for Buncombe County is drastically smaller, but according to the Fish and Wildlife Service, it could still cause irreversible damage to what is now a healthy stream. Versant Properties has requested a permit to build three dams on Baird Cove Creek, creating three small ponds in the Versant subdivision, promoted as a green development. Each pond would span just less than an acre.

“The conversion of Baird Cove Creek to three ponds will result in the loss of natural stream functions, alter the hydrology, and affect native ecosystem processes within and downstream of the proposed reservoir site,” noted FWS Field Supervisor Brian Cole in comments submitted to the Corps of Engineers’ Asheville’s office. “Although the habitat will remain in an aquatic state, the fauna and ecosystem functions associated with the stream are different from, and cannot be replaced with, associated fauna and functions from the ponds.” Cole advised that the permit be denied, and the Corps asked Versant to make changes and re-submit the plan.

“We’re obviously going to try and design a project that has minimal adverse effects on existing streams,” says Leonard Ridner, environmental-planning consultant for the company. Ridner stresses that the impoundments are still in the permitting phase, and none have been built yet.

Described as a “European-inspired village with estate-sized home sites along the top of a mountain,” Versant emphasizes environmental stewardship as part of its design. The gated community will include 169 home sites on a roughly 400-acre tract of land just north of Woodfin. Charlotte Waldron, a community planner for Versant, notes that the plans include wildlife-habitat preservation and careful attention to storm-water management. As for the dams that would impede the flow of Baird Cove Creek, she says Versant is “revisiting that idea.”

A press announcement from Versant notes that the development has joined Audubon International’s Gold Signature Program, a fee-based certification process that requires developers to follow certain environmental guidelines. Partly funded by the U.S. Golf Association, Audubon International typically certifies golf courses as being “green.”

The name Audubon may have a familiar ring to it, but Audubon International should not be confused with the National Audubon Society, a conservation group founded in 1905. In fact, The National Audubon Society has an official statement about Audubon International, with which it is often confused: “Audubon is not associated with Audubon International in any way,” the statement reads. “Audubon does not certify golf courses, or any other development, as being environmentally sound. Indeed, Audubon very often opposes such development.”

[Send your environmental news to]



Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “The Green Scene

  1. Chuck Connors

    How appropo. On Thursday June 7 (2007) a dam burst in the gated community of the ‘Balsam Preserve’ in Jackson County. This event has caused an ecological disaster. Besides the untold tons of sediment and mud released into Scotts creek and the Tuckaseigee river numerous fish and aquatic creatures have died and/or been displaced from their native habitats. Progress Energy (Duke) had to interrupt the hydro-electric power generation from all of the their dams up the east and west forks of the Tuckeigee river so as not to cause horrific flooding downsteam of Dillsboro. Twenty four hours earlier an elementary school class was enjoying a presentation by a local naturalist just below this shodily built impoundment. Ironically, Monday June 11 at 7:00 pm is the date for a public hearing at Myers auditorium (Southwestern Community College) in Sylva for the Jackson County Commissioners to hear public comment on the pending Subdivision Ordinance and the Steep Slope Ordiance (the most progressive in WNC) in Jackson County.

  2. Margie MacDonald

    I would like to go on record as a REALTOR with a conscious, and one opposed to reckless development and extensive man made alterations to our beautiful landscape. There comes a time when we need to protect our lands….we need not try to convert our land to hold features for which it is not intended. As a REALTOR, I am faced often with potential clients that want a flat lot with high elevation views as well as easy access. There are reckless developers out there who would gladly bulldoze a mountain top to give these folks just what they want, and it is time that all of us, all over WNC take a stand to keep our mountains what they are, and not to try and convert it to another’s vision of ShangraLaLa land! Those touting “green development” are riding a wave of increased public sentiment to protect our earth, but the only thing “green” that some of them really believe in is that almighty dollar! I recently went to a symposium on sustainable development in the mountains sponsored by Warren Wilson college, and much to my dismay and the dismay of others, there was one particular developer who called themselves lovers of this mountain land, who were building a “green McMansion” Their intent was obvious and it was to make money. Many in that breakout session felt that their statement of intent was incongruent with what they were doing.

    I do not presume that all developers are bad, that they all only want “green” in their wallets, but it is time to close the door on those who want to alter this beautiful place we live, and we should do what we can to shut them out!!

  3. jim

    I also am concerned about the impact of development on the natural environment. I was raised in Bairds cove and see how it is being negatively impacted by large development. I wrote a letter of concern to the COE and the NC Water Resources offices. After a long period I recieved a letter stating that there was no concern and that the plan was going forward. There are also protected species of Flora, ginseng, lady slipper, golden seal as well as salamanders and other species that are endangered by this development.
    Seems that if you have enough money you can buy anything, even that that belongs to all.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.