Green Scene: Building a movement

Bill McKibben thinks big. His 10/10/10 initiative, billed as a “global work party,” is intended to elicit “bold energy policies from our political leaders … on a scale that truly matters.” The goal, organizers say, is not to reduce global warming one project at a time but to send a pointed message to legislators about cutting carbon emissions. If more than 1,000 groups in 109 countries around the world can get to work, they say, lawmakers can too — on the legislation and treaties needed to slow down the growing climate crisis.

McKibben’s 13 books include The End of Nature (widely regarded as the first book about climate change for a general audience), and Eaarth: Making a Life on a Tough New Planet. His articles have appeared in The New Yorker, The Atlantic Monthly, Harper’s Magazine, Outside and many other publications. Here are excerpts from a recent e-mail interview with Xpress:

Mountain Xpress: What will your upcoming talk at Warren Wilson cover?
Bill McKibben:
I'll talk about where we are right now in the process of building a movement. It's my last public talk before our big 10/10/10 Global Day of Action, so I should have a pretty good sense of how things are starting to come together around the world.

How’s that progressing?
It's going great guns. We've got thousands of communities around the world involved, and in mid-September we're delivering solar panels to the White House in hopes that they'll take part. No word yet on their response — we'll see! The Indian Parliament is going to put up solar panels, and the Maldivian president. So the movement-building is going strong, but it's not yet translating into reductions in CO2, which of course is the real measure that counts.

Where does your goal of limiting carbon dioxide in the earth’s atmosphere to 350 parts per million come from?
A 2008 research paper was the first to assign a real “red line” value, and it came from the planet's foremost climatologist, Jim Hansen, and his team at NASA. They say any amount of atmospheric carbon more than 350 ppm “is not compatible with the planet on which civilization developed and to which life on earth is adapted.”

You’ve noted that we’re already at 392 ppm now. Has this encouraged folks to conclude that there's nothing to these dire warnings?
Oddly, it doesn't seem to have worked that way. It's more like when people go to the doctor and he says, “Your cholesterol is way too high.” You may feel OK, but you know it's time to go to work.

Skeptics say, “What good is it if the U.S. cuts its emissions by 50 percent tomorrow — China and India are going to keep on polluting. And how can we be sure we humans are the main cause of the accelerating climate change?” The earth's atmosphere, they argue, is too big to be affected so dramatically by smokestacks that have been active for only the last 150 years.
These folks aren’t very good at math. In 150 years, we've put hundreds of millions of years of biology — all those ferns and dinosaurs — up into the atmosphere. It would be shocking if it wasn't having an effect. Twenty years ago, scientists were still trying to figure out how much of this was us and how much was “natural cycles.” By the mid-1990s it was clear we were the main cause by far, and that conviction has grown stronger with each new study. As to China, it’s installed far more renewable power than we have. With some leadership from us (we are by far the biggest per capita contributors to warming) they may well go farther.

You and others have said the oil industry’s stranglehold is preventing passage of carbon-emissions caps and other legislative solutions. What will it take to change this?
It's going to take a very large movement, vocal enough to overcome the massive power of money wielded by the fossil-fuel industry.

You’re a father. What do you tell kids about the planet they're inheriting?
I tell them they need to get out, see the natural world and fall in love with it, and in a few years they'll be old enough to help lead the charge to protect it.

— Direct your environmental news to Susan Andrew: 251-1333, ext. 153, or


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Green Scene: Building a movement

  1. Susan Andrew

    Sorry, ya’ll, for the double boxes above–only ONE of them, the second one, has the correct info! McKibben’s talk starts at 7:00, and it will be standing room only, so come early! And yes, admission is free.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.