Exploring Buncombe County’s $459 million debt

MAKING THE GRADE: Deferred maintenance at Asheville High School gave way in the current school year to a massive $25 million campus renovation project. Scaffolding still surrounds the turret that caps the 1928 Douglas Ellington main building. Photo by Virginia Daffron

With leaking roofs and crumbling window frames in urgent need of repair, the $25 million project to update Asheville High School’s iconic 1928 Douglas Ellington building and other campus structures couldn’t wait any longer. Approved by the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners in October 2016, the ongoing project is just one of a number of high-dollar construction initiatives at local public schools.

“Anything that was detrimental to the building, that was beginning to really show wear and tear on it, all of those have been touched through this project,” says Don Simms, the director of maintenance and properties with Asheville City Schools, of the work at Asheville High.

In the future, the school system hopes to find money to replace interior finishes and install new, more efficient plumbing fixtures. “There’s still a lot of things on the interior of the building that would really need to be touched up,” Simms notes. Much of the building’s plumbing hasn’t been updated since the school was constructed in 1928.

According to the N.C. Association of County Commissioners, state law assigns responsibility for building and renovating schools to county governments, a charge that by its nature produces big bills and big amounts of debt.

At nearly half a billion dollars — $458.5 million as of June 11 — the county’s debt is no small figure. Spending on schools makes up over half of that balance, with $270 million borrowed to pay for facilities for A-B Tech and the county’s two public school systems, the Asheville City and Buncombe County schools.

As Buncombe County struggles to regain the community’s trust following allegations of fraud against former County Manager Wanda Greene, members of the county’s staff have provided additional information about county finances, including its debt, in recent months. Xpress takes a look at the county’s outstanding balances to see how they stack up against other North Carolina counties and what they can tell us about local priorities in recent years.

On the dashboard

Wanda Greene and her son Michael Greene, who also worked for the county, were indicted on fraud charges related to improper use of county credit cards on April 13, and federal prosecutors announced new charges alleging that Wanda Greene misappropriated $2.3 million in county funds to pay for life insurance policies for herself and several other county employees on June 5 (see “County releases more details about alleged Greene insurance scheme“).

Less than two weeks after Greene’s July 1, 2017, retirement, new County Manager Mandy Stone, who the county has announced will retire on July 1, 2018, presented suggestions to the Board of Commissioners to make the county’s financial information more accessible to the public.

Stone proposed a set of “dashboards” to be posted on the Buncombe County website. Increasingly used by businesses and government, data dashboards visually track and display important data points to share information and help monitor the financial health of an organization or project. The city of Asheville, for example, has created interactive online dashboards to provide budget and cost information for its capital improvement projects, including spending authorized by the city’s 2016 $74 million bond referendum.

The new online tools were part of a push by Stone towards increased transparency and accountability, says Buncombe County spokesperson Kassi Day. “However, the investigation into Wanda Greene accelerated our efforts.”

Both Stone and county Chief Financial Officer Tim Flora, whose June 15 resignation was announced on May 30, were among the senior staff members for whom Wanda Greene purchased whole-life insurance policies beginning in 2016. According to a statement issued by the Buncombe County Board of Commissioners on June 5, however, no county employee other than Wanda Greene received personal financial benefit from the policies.

In your debt

One of the county’s new dashboards provides an itemized breakdown of Buncombe County’s debt, which has been issued to pay for a wide variety of capital projects, ranging from a new animal shelter to recreational facilities to a 16-tower public radio system for the county’s first responders.

FOR THE KIDS: Buncombe County’s debt load is comprised primarily of spending on education. Image courtesy of Buncombe County
FOR THE KIDS: Buncombe County’s debt load is comprised primarily of spending on education. Image courtesy of Buncombe County

The overall size of Buncombe’s debt, says Flora, is consistent with other North Carolina counties.

The N.C. Department of State Treasurer oversees county debt through the Local Government Commission, an arm of the office that was created in the 1930s when scores of counties and cities across the state defaulted on loans in the wake of the Stock Market Crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression.

In fiscal year 2017, which is the most recent year for which the department has data available, Buncombe County’s total tax-supported, long-term debt was about $395 million. That amount represents almost 1.3 percent of the county’s total appraised property value, which in FY 2017 was more than $30 billion.

That ratio was the second-smallest among the seven counties in North Carolina with a population greater than 250,000. The highest ratio was held by Forsyth County, which encompasses Winston-Salem, at 2.68 percent; eastern North Carolina’s Cumberland County, whose county seat is Fayetteville, boasted the lowest ratio, at 0.43 percent.

The Department of State Treasurer uses several benchmarks to measure the financial health of counties. A county’s “financial obligation,” for example, measures the proportion of its overall spending a county dedicates to paying off debt in a given year compared to its total expenditures.

In FY 2017, seven percent of Buncombe County’s expenditures went to pay off debt. According to the Department of State Treasurer, counties tend to be in trouble when they reach 15 to 20 percent.

By the end of the 2018 fiscal year, Buncombe County will have made $48.5 million in debt service payments, with $29.3 million of that money paying down the county’s principal debt balance.

Buncombe County policy requires county government to pay off 55 percent of its debt within 10 years. According to a third-quarter financial report delivered to commissioners during a meeting on May 1, the county is poised to pay off 63 percent of this allotment within that time frame.

It takes a county

Almost 60 percent of Buncombe County’s debt is wrapped up in education.

Kevin Leonard, the executive director of the N.C. Association of County Commissioners, notes that Buncombe County’s percentage split between education debt and remaining expenditures is fairly typical for counties in North Carolina.

“Counties are significantly different from cities in that our budgets are really focused on education and health and human services,” he says, “and so a lot of the funding for counties, the majority of their budgets are really made up by those two components.”

SOCIAL STRUCTURE: A new building and parking garage at the Buncombe County Health and Human Services Department facility on Coxe Avenue in downtown Asheville added $xxx to the county's debt. Photo by Virginia Daffron
SOCIAL STRUCTURE: Buncombe County has about $45 million still remaining on the debt it issued to construct a new building and parking garage at the Buncombe County Health and Human Services Department facility on Coxe Avenue in downtown Asheville. Photo by Virginia Daffron

Human services makes up another significant piece of Buncombe County’s debt ― almost $56 million. The money the county borrowed to expand its Health and Human Services building at 40 Coxe Ave. makes up the majority of this sum, with a $45 million balance yet to be paid off.

Greg Allison, a professor at the UNC School of Government, says education spending tends to be the most significant portion of the debt for large, growing counties in North Carolina, with that money spent primarily on construction and renovation of school facilities to keep up with the influx of students. For example, Wake County, which encompasses Raleigh, issued a nearly $1 billion bond several years ago for school projects.

“There’s an inordinate amount of pressures on a county to take care of all of the infrastructure that they need,” Leonard says. Buncombe County issues long-term debt to purchase or construct capital improvements or equipment and has a policy against issuing long-term debt for operational expenses.

Doling it out

Every dollar spent on school construction by Buncombe County goes in front of a five-member body called the School Capital Fund Commission.

The commission oversees a pot of money fed by sales tax revenue identified in article 39 of the state tax code. For every dollar spent at retail in Buncombe County, one cent passes to county government as article 39 revenue. Half of that cent goes to the School Capital Fund Commission to pay for school projects. The county also receives a combined 1 ¼ cent through article 40, 42 and 46 sales tax revenue. Part of that money funds school capital expenses and debt service payments. A quarter-cent is set aside for capital projects and operating needs at A-B Tech.

Board of Commissioners Chair Brownie Newman sits on the School Capital Fund Commission. He estimates that a majority of the projects funded by the body are supported by the issuance of debt. Newman says the county doesn’t have enough cash on hand in the School Capital Fund to pay outright for all of the projects the commission decides to support.

“Just like most people who aren’t millionaires, you don’t just buy a house with $300,000 in cash,” he said. “You’d get a home loan and you’d buy your house and pay for it over time.”

School needs

Counties in North Carolina will face a combined $8.1 billion in school capital spending needs between 2015 and 2020, according to a 2015 report completed by the N.C. Department of Public Instruction.

The report predicted that the greatest need would come from Wake, Guildford, Mecklenburg, Forsyth and Union counties, which would have to absorb a combined total of $2.56 billion in school capital projects.

In contrast, Buncombe County makes up a small fraction of the total; the report predicted that the county would require only about $64 million split between Buncombe County and Asheville City schools.

Every county has an issue with building schools, says Leonard, “whether it is keeping up with capacity or whether it is renovating what they’ve got or consolidating because they’ve lost population.”

Leonard says he believes a part of the solution to this problem is a statewide $1.9 billion — “with a b” — bond referendum that has received backing from multiple education advocacy groups. Supporters hope to get the bond on the ballot in November.

A website set up by bond supporters argues that because counties are spending more on school operational costs ― salaries, employee benefits and supplies ― they have less available funding for school construction.

According to the N.C. Association of County Commissioners, the state provides money for operational expenses to school systems, but counties have the leeway to supplement this with additional funding.

During a budget work session on May 8, Buncombe County Schools Superintendent Tony Baldwin told commissioners that while the largest percentage of the system’s funding comes from the state, a growing portion is coming from Buncombe County.

An increasing reliance on local funding is a trend that appears to extend to school systems across North Carolina.

Between 2007 and 2017, the total amount of money that counties have spent on school operating expenses has increased from $2.6 billion to $3.1 billion.

“The per-pupil spending is increasing … and it’s because counties are committed to good schools,” Leonard said. “Every county wants to do the best they can for their kids.”

Navigating pitfalls

Leonard says Buncombe County is probably positioned better than many counties in the state because of growing sales tax revenue in Asheville. “You all have just been growing like gangbusters,” he says. But that doesn’t make Buncombe County immune from future budget crunches.

With state legislators pushing for reduced classroom sizes for elementary school students, Leonard believes school systems across the state could be required to construct additions to make up for a lack of space. There’s also the question of school safety, an issue that has reached a national fever pitch following recent mass school shootings in Florida and Texas.

“People think about school safety and they think about [school resource officers],” Leonard said. “I automatically think … about doors and fencing and electronic locking systems for schools and shatterproof glass, etc.” That’s all a capital expense, which would fall on counties to fund, he explains.

Rep. Brian Turner, whose district spreads across the western portion of Buncombe County, says a state bond would help Buncombe County as it addresses school security issues and construction pressure related to reduced classroom sizes.

Turner points to Candler Elementary School as an example of a local school that needs enhanced security measures. “Candler Elementary is spread across three buildings and there is not any controlled access,” he says. “Essentially, kids go outside all the time to get from one class to the other.” Because Candler Elementary School is in the Buncombe County School system, the bill for any capital improvements to address security would likely fall to Buncombe County.

On the face of it, Turner says, reduced classroom sizes are a good thing.

“The smaller the classes, the more individualized attention the child’s going to get,” Turner says. “The problem is the General Assembly, [number] one, didn’t appropriate any money for additional teachers and, number two, when you start reducing class sizes, that means you’re going to have more classes, which means you need more classrooms.” Turner says the General Assembly didn’t appropriate any money for additional classrooms. The legislature did pass a bill that offered school systems a one-year extension on fulfilling this mandate, “but we haven’t solved the overall problem,” Turner says.

Assistant Asheville City Schools Superintendent Terrence McAllister said the system made arrangements about a year and a half ago to ensure there would be enough room for students at each school.

“It’s going to depend on the influx of students we receive both in district and out of district to see whether in the future we’ll have to add additional classrooms or not,” he said, “but right now we have a good plan in place.”

With room to run in its indebtedness, Buncombe County appears to be in a position to take on more debt to cover future school building or other capital needs as they arise. Whether county residents trust elected officials and county staff to prudently manage and oversee that spending, however, depends in part on how far county transparency efforts like the new online dashboards can go in reassuring locals that the oversight failures of the Wanda Greene era won’t be repeated in the present.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About David Floyd
David Floyd was a reporter for the Mountain Xpress. He previously worked as a general-assignment reporter for the Johnson City Press.

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

13 thoughts on “Exploring Buncombe County’s $459 million debt

  1. Lulz

    While spending is inevitable, waste is not. You would do everyone a service by looking into how the money is spent, the stupid decision making processes involved on top of redundancy in doing so. It might shock you to see that something on tap for repair this year will just be torn apart next year in order to fix something else. And that’s because funds are allotted towards one project at a time even though the following year, it’ll be repaired again due to a subsequent project directly impacting it. In other words, instead of fixing everything all at once, they’ll fix one thing this year and tear it all out to fix another thing next year. It makes no sense.

    These people in charge of spending have no clue what they’re doing. Government spending is never contained because they’ll simply raise taxes to make up for it. Even though in many cases money can be saved by using common sense.

    • luther blissett

      Does that mean you’d support temporary increased borrowing or tax increases with a sunset in order to fund capital improvement projects that are done once, done right, and have a multi-decade lifespan?

      • Lulz

        LOL why yes you know since the county has been such great stewards of the money they’ve gotten so far, let’s give them even more lulz. Only the insane are calling for higher taxes simply to be spent by morons who if employed in a REAL WORLD job would be fired for their complete and total incompetence.

        Considering the fiasco that is the corruption in Buncombe County government, I seriously doubt higher taxes would be used for anything except more waste. If not outright fraud and theft.

        The county is an employment agency for people that are lacking in talent. They care more about padding their numbers instead of ability.

        • luther blissett

          LOL can’t propose a single real policy, just “everything is wrong but I won’t tell you what should happen instead.” So easy and so pointless.

          • Lulz

            And tax raises are what exactly especially in light of the corruption that is Buncombe County? You want more money for schools? I know, go get it from the likes of Green and the rest of the scumbags.

            Look up what insanity means, Cause doing the same thing over and over and expecting different outcomes is stupid. More importantly, why do you think an entity in debt to the tune of 500 million should get more money? In the private sector those businesses go bye bye. If the county can’t control not only its spending but also its employees, then its internal processes need to be replaced with something more cost effective.

          • luther blissett

            More tedious chaff. Every single time.

            — This is terrible and the people in power are terrible.
            — What should be done instead?
            — This is terrible and the people in power are terrible.
            — If you’re so upset, maybe you should run for office on a different platform?
            — This is terrible and the people in power are terrible.

            Let us know where you work so we can all show up and tell you what you’re doing is stupid and wrong but never say what should be done instead.

          • luther blissett

            “Cause doing the same thing over and over and expecting different outcomes is stupid.”

            What should be done instead? It’s a very simple question you have never answered.

  2. boatrocker

    Anthropology 101 and easily the most under-reported issue in any local rag for the past say 10 years-
    Asheville has outgrown its Malthusian carrying capacity. The pink elephant in the room.
    The Emperor’s New Clothes, call it what you will.

    With that comes stagnant wages, skyrocketing rent, police/elected official corruption, traffic woes,
    gentrification, crumbling infrastructure, etc. The Fall of the Roman/Mayan/Ashevillian Empire, call it what you will but IMHO it started with rampant overdevelopment to turn a quick buck. Locals gettin’ greedy selling family land. Thanks, yo’uns. Way to foul yo’uns’ own nest, bless your hearts.

    Place the blame on whatever political party, but yay, keep penning articles about fruity beers.

    • Lulz

      LOL you don’t suppose that many who sold were elderly and unable to pay the skyrocketing taxes along with the bogus fees that leftoids seem to tack on for everything from “stormwater” to farting do you?

      • boatrocker

        Taxes taxes oh my!
        Does your Supply Side Jesus pony do any other tricks?
        Taxes, eh? Let’s talk about the MIC for taxes and out of control spending.

        • Lulz

          500 million in debt is out of control spending. Especially if those who handle the money aren’t able to make good decisions.

          I know that government is an agency that employs the mentally challenged, the lazy, and in Green”s case sociopaths who steal, but c’mon. Enough is enough.

          • luther blissett

            “The overall size of Buncombe’s debt, says Flora, is consistent with other North Carolina counties.”

            And you can’t get away with “unable to pay the skyrocketing taxes” when a) increased property taxes reflect skyrocketing property values; b)state law provides a 50% break on property taxes for over-65s with incomes under $29,000. I’m all about improving life for working stiffs, but people facing $1000 medical bills come well ahead of people whose property tax went up $1000 because they’re sitting on an extra $200,000 in equity.

  3. Enlightened Enigma

    Start saving MILLIONS of $$$ by consolidating the two government screwl systems … WHY should we continue to pay for this duplication ? ENOUGH and consolidation yields more diversity and equality across the county…. Shut the CITY screwl system and merge it with county system…save MILLION$$$!

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.