State judicial candidates belly up to the reform bar

All 12 candidates in this year's state judicial races has signaled a willingness to abide by public-financing rules in their campaigns. North Carolina's 2002 Judicial Campaign Reform Act enables candidates for the state Court of Appeals or Supreme Court to opt for what are commonly known as "voter-owned elections," partly funded by a $3 checkoff on state tax returns.

And with the April 15 tax-filing deadline looming, Weaverville resident Kathleen Balogh, president of the N.C. League of Women Voters, is encouraging individual taxpayers to do their bit. "Please look for this checkoff box on your income tax return — it will not come out of your tax refund — and please put your check in that box!" she urges. (The $3 is taken directly from taxes already being paid.)

Public funding kicks in for those judicial participants who make it past the May 4 primary — provided they meet state guidelines. To qualify, candidates must raise about $40,000 in small donations ($10 to $500) from a minimum of 350 registered voters and agree to strict fundraising and spending limits. In exchange, they receive public grants of $164,400 (for Court of Appeals races) or $240,100 (for Supreme Court contests).

The reform program also pays for the 2010 Primary Voter Guide, a pamphlet the State Board of Elections mailed to N.C. residents recently. Chock full of information, it provides profiles of the candidates for the state's top courts to encourage the public to cast votes in those races. (If you tossed yours, you can download it at
For more on the 2010 judicial primary races, see our Voter's Guide in the April 21 Xpress.


Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.