Nonpartisan elections keep a level playing field

To my mind, the choice between partisan and nonpartisan Asheville City Council elections is a dilemma, because neither choice is good enough. Let me explain.

Partisan elections put unaffiliated candidates at a serious disadvantage. In order to run, they must petition to file, and to file they must collect 2,357 valid signatures. If they obtain about the same percentage of valid signatures on their sheets as we did for the Let Asheville Vote campaign, they’ll need to turn in about 2,900 signatures. I’ll not say that’s impossible, but as a recent signature-gatherer, I will say that it’s a full-time job for a sizable number of supporters. Let Asheville Vote succeeded partly because there were close to 100 people working the streets, following a media blitz the likes of which this town hadn’t seen in years. Consciousness had been raised, and the campaign’s signature-gatherers took advantage of that awareness. Individual candidates would lack that advantage.

The good news about nonpartisan elections is that it keeps the ground level at the front door of City Hall: Any city resident can run for City Council merely by paying a $75 filing fee. But if we vote “no” and City Council elections continue to be nonpartisan, the candidates’ party affiliations won’t appear on the ballot. And according to the Council members who initially approved the switch to partisan elections (all of whom are Democrats), voters are forever asking about candidates’ party affiliations.

Personally, I am a partisan, and I make no bones about it. I am proud to be a partisan. Truth to tell, a lot of voters do rely on party affiliation to guide their choices, spending too little time investigating the candidates’ stands on the issues of the day.

Still, I believe that we partisans are supposed to look out for the interests of all city residents—including our unaffiliated friends and those belonging to the other major party. (As an aside, a partisan who doesn’t have friends in the other major party has a major problem, in my opinion.)

So what shall we do? I recommend a two-step approach. First, let’s vote “no” on the partisan-election referendum in November, retain our level playing field, and spend some time between now and Nov. 6 giving the voters their crutch, if you will—helping educate them about the candidates’ party affiliations, whether by means of letters to the editor, print ads, radio or television. Second, let’s petition our legislators to make one small but significant change in North Carolina’s voting law allowing each candidate to append a single letter of the alphabet to their name, whether it’s a “D” or “R” or “U” or “G” or “L” or whatever. That one-sentence modification of the law would give voters the clue that some desire.

In the long run, I recommend that we adopt the same criterion for electing judges in North Carolina. Too much time and money are spent helping voters figure out which party judicial candidates belong to.

The major political parties will always help support their own candidates; that’s why they exist. To suggest that they should abstain from doing their job is to take way their First Amendment rights. But more and more, Buncombe County residents do not want a D or an R appended to their voter registration, and we must allow them not only to vote, but also to run for office on a playing field that’s kept as level as possible.

[Asheville resident George Keller is the secretary of the Buncombe County Republican Party.]

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Nonpartisan elections keep a level playing field

  1. am Vet

    Thank goodness the people prevailed and quashed partisan elections. The “progressives” wanted to take over. Thankfully patriots defeated them. Now,for the general election, VOTE OUT NEWMAN and FREEBORN.

  2. travelah

    Mr Keller has offered a very sensible solution that directly addresses the “partisan” identification issue. Since it makes such good and logical sense, it is surely opposed by the fauxprog movement. Why would the fauxprogs oppose it? The answer is simply because it allows too many non-party controlled non-Democrats onto the ballot. The objective of such people is not to serve the interests of the voting public but to serve their own self-serving preservation interests instead.

    Now, if each candidate chose to identify himself as a Democrat, Republican, Independent or otherwise, the public would then have a good idea of what each candidate held to philosophically. The only downside I can see is if the Democrats followed Newman’s lead and engaged in further dirty tricks such as having additional fauxprogs run with an R after their name. Then again, they are going to do their dirty tricks whether we have non-partisan elects or not.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.