Letter: Air sampling for mold offers valuable data

Graphic by Lori Deaton

I was disappointed by the lack of acknowledgement of the value and benefits of air sampling for mold by the interviewees in Kim Dinan’s article, “Hidden Hazards: Is Your Home Making You Sick?” [Feb. 21, Xpress]. As a registered professional environmental engineer, licensed home inspector, certified mold inspector/remediator and recognized mold expert by the Buncombe County court system, I can offer a different perspective on this pervasive health issue in our region.

I often get calls from people who are getting sick after they or someone unqualified dealt with a mold situation without the requisite knowledge, equipment and procedures. Qualified environmental professionals rely on sampling and laboratory analysis as an essential tool for evaluating exposure to environmental contaminants, mold notwithstanding. The lack of established regulatory limits for mold exposure doesn’t diminish the value of data, collected and evaluated by a competent indoor environmental professional, for making major decisions and identifying unseen health hazards.

There are normal background concentration ranges for common mold spores in the air in our region. The degree to which indoor concentrations exceed these ranges is a measure of potential health risk. Regulatory limits for mold in air are not feasible due to the complexities involved; however, there is guidance from regulatory agencies and industry standards for mold inspection and remediation.

The U.S. EPA outlines mold conditions that should be managed by environmental professionals. Industry standards include mold inspection and testing to characterize the nature and extent of contamination and airborne concentrations.

It’s true that identification of mold species is not necessary before taking measures to address mold and eliminate the underlying causes; however, it is important and a standard practice to perform air sampling, before and after mold remediation, to ensure reduction of high concentrations and effective containment during remediation. It is a disservice to the community to suggest that mold testing is unnecessary.

— John Mueller, PE
Mueller Environmental & Home Inspection

Editor’s response: Thank you for adding emphasis and information to the hazards of indoor air pollution, including mold.


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.