Letter: Another view from Haywood Street advisory team

Graphic by Lori Deaton

On April 12, your paper ran an [letter to the editor] titled “Park Is Not a Four-letter Word,” written by Julie Nelson, one member of the Haywood/Page Visioning Advisory Team. I, too, was a member of the advisory team and would like to offer another view of the process and its results.

Ms. Nelson stated that public input was overwhelmingly in favor of open, public green space. It is true that many comments expressed a desire for green space. It is also true, however, that questions posed to the public didn’t assume that an answer favoring one use necessarily excluded all others.

For example, people were not asked, “What is the only thing you would like to do on the property.” In the results of the Open City Hall survey, Public Civic Space did have the highest single total at 351. However, 484 responses asked for a variety of active, locally based mixed uses, retail, commerce or residential space.

The advisory team did not just consider the data collected from the public. Team members also studied the site itself; the views into and out of the site, the vehicular and pedestrian traffic around the site, and the topography of the site were all examined. Suggested uses were filtered to find those possible uses that were compatible with the property’s neighbors.

Ms. Nelson correctly notes that Section 3 of the current Downtown Master Plan recommends a park at the tip of the property closest to the basilica. The plan also identifies the southwest section of the property as an enhancement/redevelopment priority.

The April 12 [letter] states that the task force was made up of “mostly downtown developers/business people currently serving on other city boards and commissions,” not “average citizens.” I believe that businesspeople willing to give their time to serve on boards and commissions are citizens, too, and indeed this willingness to serve is one of the things that make Asheville a great place to live.

In addition to those, Ms. Nelson mentioned there were members representing downtown residents, the busker community, the two senior apartment buildings that surround the property being studied, three at-large members, and Ms. Nelson herself, who represented the Friends of St. Lawrence Green.

That’s why I voted for the 17-page document produced by the advisory team.

— Susan Robbins
Haywood Street Advisory Team Task Force member


Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

2 thoughts on “Letter: Another view from Haywood Street advisory team

  1. SpareChange

    Thank you! This stands as an excellent response to those who have engaged in an intellectually dishonest political campaign to cast the Haywood property issue as a strict “either / or” choice between a park (and nothing but a park), or total development of the parcel by unspecified sinister forces. Thank you for giving voice and clarity to that middle ground of the issue that stands not just as a perfectly reasonable political and policy compromise, but also represents the city’s best chance to come up with a plan which serves the multiple divergent interests of the community (and provides some promise of being able to pay for and maintain it).

    • NFB

      Agreed. The constant “either/or” harping of park supporters has been a major turnoff for a lot of people many who are sympathetic to the notion of green space in the area.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.