Letter: Looking for safeguards in Woodfin

Graphic by Lori Deaton

There’s a saying that perception is reality. And fair or not, it often holds true.

For years, the town of Woodfin has been perceived to be operating in secrecy, shutting out the public, changing ordinances to favor developers over taxpayers. In the past year, I’ve heard many locals suggest there should be an investigation to see if any elected officials have conflicts of interest or have reaped personal gain. When you ignore your constituents, all sorts of rumors (true or false) tend to swirl about.

I am one of a handful of concerned citizens who has been asking for answers about the proposed Bluffs development for nearly a year.

After all this time, we have not been given any assurances from Woodfin officials or staff that they will take any steps to safeguard our community, the French Broad River, Richmond Hill Park, Silver-Line Park or the quality of life of people who have invested decades and significant amounts of money to carve out lives and homes.

On Nov. 2, the public made their voices heard loud and clear at the polls. Commissioners-elect Eric Edgerton, Jim McAllister and Hazel Thornton defeated three Woodfin incumbents in landslide victories that came about largely due to all that I’ve mentioned above.

The town of Woodfin has obfuscated when it should have been more honest and clear. It should have made a concerted effort to protect the environment and the people; it should have responded to our questions and concerns rather than saying our well-founded questions backed up by facts were merely conjecture.

I have repeatedly asked that two very reasonable sentences be added to Woodfin’s zoning ordinances, and I wish to state them publicly here:
• Require environmental studies for all projects over a certain size that border — or that will have significant potential runoff — into the French Broad River or its tributaries.
• Require a traffic study for all large projects regardless of what the developer estimates the traffic to be.

As any reasonable, forward-thinking human can see, my requests have nothing to do with NIMBYism or any of the derogatory statements often bandied about when locals oppose development. My desire to protect the river and my fellow citizens stems simply from caring and common sense.

— Robert McGee
Asheville

SHARE

Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

4 thoughts on “Letter: Looking for safeguards in Woodfin

  1. indy499

    Hahaha. Of course your requests, esp the second one, are all about NIMBY.

  2. luther blissett

    Woodfin is a police department with a municipal government nailed on. Expecting it to behave like a real town is laudable but futile.

    • Robert McGee

      Thanks, Luther. Since we the people can’t dismantle, we shall endeavor to elevate.

  3. kw

    Why on Earth would local leaders *not* wish to safeguard the river and area taxpayers/residents if they are indeed leaders?

Leave a Reply to indy499 ×

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.