Letter: Where are workers’ views on tourism plans?

Graphic by Lori Deaton

In response to the article published on Feb. 17 titled, “Stay Awhile: New TDA Boss Sketches Post-pandemic Tourism Plans” [Xpress], I was disappointed not to see any counterargument or opposition represented in response to some of the details mentioned in relation to the Tourism Development Authority money pool. Xpress could have had a voice representing the workers (referred to as protesters in the article) in Buncombe County. Most people I know working in the “hospitality field” are struggling to meet the recently announced $17-plus per hour living wage threshold and facing rising property taxes.

Buncombe County is indebted to the workers for making it a desirable, marketable place.

People sometimes have to work multiple jobs within the industry — waiting tables in the morning, bartending in the afternoon, cleaning STRs, playing a gig (before COVID) at night. Also, people outside the hospitality industry, for example, child care workers and educators, might have to take second/third jobs — catering gigs, cashier at a grocery store, a weekend shift at a brewery or hotel — to make ends meet. The hospitality industry exploits people who are underpaid, working below living wage, expecting tips to balance out their income. Sure, someone can have a good night collecting tips, but that, as COVID has put front and center, is not guaranteed.

A lot of these hard workers are also the artists, musicians, pop-up small-business owners and future political leaders working in restaurants and hotels to pay rent and bills so they can work on their passion projects in their spare time. Workers make Asheville and Buncombe County an interesting place to want to visit for the out-of-towner.

Without advertising, Buncombe County had its “best-ever month.” The article mentions the TDA [almost entirely] paused spending on advertising “in May in light of COVID-19,” but in October of 2020, “Buncombe County recorded its best-ever month of room sales: over $53.7 million.”

I read this to say: Without advertising, Buncombe County still managed to record its best-ever month of room sales, during a pandemic!? My question is why are we spending so much on advertising? [Almost] no money was spent since May, and yet the county had its “best-ever month?” No advertising was done to hit the “best-ever month,” yet Victoria “Vic” Isley is going to be paid a quarter of a million dollar salary?

According to the Feb. 17 article, the occupancy tax collected, by state law, has to be split 75% to pay back into the advertising pool, then 25% for “local capital projects.”

At the very least, this occupancy tax needs to be split 50/50 — giving more money back to the community. Please elaborate on the definition of “local capital projects?” — where does that 25% go? Why, as Sen. Julie Mayfield says, is “affordable housing … off the table?” What else is considered “off the table?”

— Ryan Anderson

Editor’s response: Thank you for your feedback. Although this article focused on the TDA’s plans, an AVL Watchdog article published in Xpress last May included the perspectives of local workers on the TDA’s $5 million contribution to a coronavirus relief bill (avl.mx/927). Previous Xpress articles have delved into the debate around how local occupancy taxes can be spent, including the requirement that 25% go to “tourism-related capital expenditures” (avl.mx/925).



Thanks for reading through to the end…

We share your inclination to get the whole story. For the past 25 years, Xpress has been committed to in-depth, balanced reporting about the greater Asheville area. We want everyone to have access to our stories. That’s a big part of why we've never charged for the paper or put up a paywall.

We’re pretty sure that you know journalism faces big challenges these days. Advertising no longer pays the whole cost. Media outlets around the country are asking their readers to chip in. Xpress needs help, too. We hope you’ll consider signing up to be a member of Xpress. For as little as $5 a month — the cost of a craft beer or kombucha — you can help keep local journalism strong. It only takes a moment.

About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

3 thoughts on “Letter: Where are workers’ views on tourism plans?

  1. Xiden lost, we all know it.

    I wish you well with the tourists, I’m personally boycotting “woke” Asheville. As a resident of the county, I will go elsewhere, or stay home.

    • Dopamina

      It’s unfortunate Asheville makes you so uncomfortable that you stay out of town :(

      However, I applaud you speaking with you wallet. If you don’t like what certain businesses or people stand for then don’t spend money with them…maybe you could organize people on social media and….”cancel” Asheville? Or is that only something people on the left do? I do wonder how what you are choosing to do with your money is any different than any other “cancel” campaign?

      To be clear, I feel actions like yours and the actions of others, cancel culture if you will, is merely a reflection of market forces at work. But oddly some people think when they boycott a company it’s totally cool but not when those other people do it…

  2. Robert

    Unfortunately, there will never be affordable housing in Asheville again. There might be subsidized or treadmill housing or human storage units, but never again affordable housing because TDA money is directed to bring wealthy tourists here. A percentage of those wealthy tourists will purchase homes (primary, secondary, investment/AirBnB), removing more and more homes which in past decades might have been sold or rented as affordable housing.

    So, when you hear about developments like the Bluffs or Charlotte Street and sneaky developers try to push their projects through by promising (but not guaranteeing) affordable housing, you can be sure that it’s all just another ploy. How to get affordable housing? Move someplace where prices or lower, or come here from a higher-priced area just as TDA dollars are inviting others to do…any local official who does not voice objection to this ponzi scheme is enabling the fiasco…

    Our main focus now should be taking care of the people who are already here. Protect our lovely area and all its natural resources. Speak up and speak often and be loud.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.