Letter writer: Article may generate discussion on near-death experiences

Graphic by Lori Deaton

I want to thank Mountain Xpress for the excellent article on near-death experiences [“Worlds in Collision: Near-death Experiences in WNC,” April 13]. I also want to express my gratitude to those individuals who shared their intensely personal stories. I trust that this article will generate discussions regarding NDEs and, more generally, the nature of consciousness and its relationship to the brain.

David Chalmers has defined the nature of consciousness as the “hard problem” of philosophy of mind and suggests that it may take a century to solve this problem. This is not to say that the other challenges of cognitive science, such as detailing the many intricate relationships between the brain and consciousness, are easy. It is just that, given sufficient research, these problems seem amenable to solutions.

Like most individuals who have studied this area, I have adopted a world view of materialistic monism. As to the hard problem, I am simply agnostic. However, your article on NDEs, and similar articles on other aspects of parapsychology, have made my agnosticism more open and sincere.

Cognitive science has established a large body of evidence regarding the intimate relationship between the brain and consciousness. Just as the reality of NDEs must be respected, so must the work of these scientists. I believe that to make claims of life after death, based on very real NDEs, is going too far too fast. It is one thing to have an intense, personally transforming experience and quite something else to make an ontological claim about that experience. One problem with this claim is that it implies a fundamental dualism, a philosophical position filled with difficulties.

Central to the process of scientific inquiry is an openness to new data. It appears that our scientific models cannot adequately deal with the data from NDEs and similar events. Perhaps doing this will involve an evolution of our current models, or even the creation of entirely new models. The scientific and philosophical work on these problems will move forward deliberately and methodically, the only path to real progress and knowledge.

— Richard Winchell
Weaverville

SHARE
About Letters
We want to hear from you! Send your letters and commentary to letters@mountainx.com

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Letter writer: Article may generate discussion on near-death experiences

  1. C

    I know that I’m a little late on this, but I agree, I think that NDE’s have some compelling info; whether you believe in a blank nonexistence after death or in some sort of continuance. Either way, these experiences are fascinating and, in my view, not to be balked at.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.