Lots of vacation time?

The BID program proposes a staff of 14 employees to cover the downtown business district. What will these 14 employees be doing the three to four winter months when there are few visitors to Asheville downtown? In addition to the slack time in winter, during the rest of the year downtown is busy from Wednesday through Saturday. The rest of the week the downtown area is pretty empty of tourists and local visitors.

Can't the city achieve the same results as the BID proposes by hiring three to four additional staff members without the excessive costs that the current proposal entails?

Downtown Asheville is a recreation hub for the entire city of Asheville and Buncombe County. The majority of people who frequent downtown are Buncombe County residents. If additional money is needed to keep downtown clean, safe and green it should be borne by all the people who use it.

Furthermore, the BID proposal asks residents in the downtown business district to pay the same tax rate as businesses, in effect subsidizing businesses that are expected to have increases in sales revenue.

There are many fundamental shortcomings of the BID proposal: privatization of public service, an unrepresentative board of directors, excessive administrative/supervisory staff, lack of budgetary details and an unfair tax structure.

— Fred Guggenheim

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Lots of vacation time?

  1. indy499

    Too little time to take on all the errors, so here’s the most obvious ones.

    State law REQUIRES that all property owners pay the same rate. Should the proponents have brought forward an illegal plan?

    Not familiar with the author’s vast business acumen, but the plan has 1 director and a part time office person overseeing all of the direct work being done in a $ 750,000 effort. Not sure that hits the excessive admin/supervisory level for anyone except, apparently, the author.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.