Ignoring logical necessity

Driving on formerly forested Sweeten Creek Road these days provides a pretty lousy view! Tract after tract of beautiful wood lots has been erased. Soon comes the relentless paving process. Usually, more trees are cut than are necessary to fit the structures.

Why do we, as a civilization, insist on this same old crappy style of development/sprawl as if we don’t really know better? Why are you bankers pushing these projects (yeah, we know—profit) devoid of any environmental conscience? There’s the stretching of the infrastructure (try to taste the water we get, which is mixed with smelly water from Mills River, after letting it stand in the glass for a few hours!), the runoff of soil and the diminishing rate of carbon-capturing by trees.

You opponents of vertical density, by ignoring the logical necessity of building upwards in the already-paved parts of the city rather than building ever outwards, are devouring the woods. Vertical development alone won’t work. We need to hear of plans for rail systems, both commuter and those connected to the larger, interstate-rail systems.

It is futile to continue building limitless suburban tracts requiring limitless water, limitless numbers of gas-burning vehicles, limitless roads for them to drive on and limitless gasoline. We are making the choking of our mountains and the rest of the planet inevitable.

I would welcome an answer in these pages or any other public forum, from anyone who is sincerely interested and capable of permanently and widely instituting these changes in our present super-ugly and earth-hating development style.

— Tom Coppola

About Webmaster
Mountain Xpress Webmaster Follow me @MXWebTeam

Before you comment

The comments section is here to provide a platform for civil dialogue on the issues we face together as a local community. Xpress is committed to offering this platform for all voices, but when the tone of the discussion gets nasty or strays off topic, we believe many people choose not to participate. Xpress editors are determined to moderate comments to ensure a constructive interchange is maintained. All comments judged not to be in keeping with the spirit of civil discourse will be removed and repeat violators will be banned. See here for our terms of service. Thank you for being part of this effort to promote respectful discussion.

One thought on “Ignoring logical necessity

  1. craig

    I say this humbly and with due respect as an outsider who lives 100 miles to the east of Asheville in a slightly larger N.C. city: I think that a region that permits growth will have to accomodate it in some way. Innovative plans that incorporate upward and outward growth with infill will ease the burden, but in the wild world demographics and population shifts, I’d hate to be the planner who tries to find the balance. I dare say that perhaps we should also look beyond development, to the general issue of overpopulation, not just in Western N.C., but globally. We’re enjoying the resources that are available to us now. I’m not sure that future generations will have the same access to them. We should probably accept this as fact, even as we rightfully try to solve some of these difficult problems. Realizing that the earth’s resources are finite might influence the way we think about our reproductive habits.

Leave a Reply

To leave a reply you may Login with your Mountain Xpress account, connect socially or enter your name and e-mail. Your e-mail address will not be published. All fields are required.